-
Content
4,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Butters
-
Yes, yes, and yes. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Randy"The Natural" Cotoure coming out of retirement to fight Sylvia
Butters replied to GQ_jumper's topic in The Bonfire
They need to get Fedor Emelianenko. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
Should people be required to pass a basic intelligence test (consisting of history/logic/etc... questions) before they can vote? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Randy"The Natural" Cotoure coming out of retirement to fight Sylvia
Butters replied to GQ_jumper's topic in The Bonfire
I really don't care! I just want anyone but Sylvia to hold the belt. PRIDE fighters in the UFC? They're not going to dance around the ring on all fours on their backs for 3 rounds are they? Different kind of PRIDE fighting. But I do believe there is footage of the fighting you are referring to somewhere on the internet. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
Randy"The Natural" Cotoure coming out of retirement to fight Sylvia
Butters replied to GQ_jumper's topic in The Bonfire
I agree but I would rather see a new fighter take the belt than an old fighter, but if an old fighter has evolved their game to the point that they can win it ... PS: I can't wait to start seeing PRIDE fighters in the UFC! "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
So you know for absolute certainty who he is but you won't tell anyone else ... sure, we believe you. PS: I do understand what you are saying about people calling themselves Christians but not acting like Christians (or even knowing anything about Christianity). I know plenty of people who call themselves Christian and then worship celebrities, material possessions, and many other things above their God. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
And I thought statistics showed that Christianity was growing? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
So who is this man that will become (or is) the anti-christ? PS: When I read this I picture a man in a cave lit by candles holding a bible while mumbling, "my precious", over and over again. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Randy"The Natural" Cotoure coming out of retirement to fight Sylvia
Butters replied to GQ_jumper's topic in The Bonfire
I think this is a bad idea. I keep picturing Ken Shamrock. I think this is a really bad idea. What will he do if he wins and then has to defend the belt? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
Some people see beyond the color of skin and attribute problems to the values a person holds instead of their skin color (just because a person is a certain skin color does not mean they have certain values). "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Divorce the wife so you can have more time and money to fix and ride the motorcycle! "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Thanks for the laugh. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
True. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
But that's the point, isn't it? That people waited...and in CO, no-one waited. They just acted. Maybe it's just me. But a catagory 5 on a scale of 5, regardless of if it's rain or snow, is pretty bad. And yet...well...people did what they had to do to make sure their communities survived and came together to help each other. 4 feet of snow is hardly a natural disaster. Well, if it happened in Washington DC it would be, but Denver gets heavy storms every year. This one was merely a bit bigger. So people don't need to learn what to do - they've done it every year they lived there. If you want a Katrina equilivient, it would be if a "Cat 5" avalanche swept into the city, burying thousands under the snow, and making thousands of other homes uninhabitable. Then you have a race against time - people freezing to death - with about the same timelines as people drowning in NO. And you can have people mugging each other for down jackets. Only if you know about the avalanche days ahead of time. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Don't you read anything in the Speakers Corner ... guns are bad ... hunting is bad ... PS: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16580807/ "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Bill, do you really think the majority of the residents in the 9th ward have a credit card? (usually necessary to rent a car) or are you just yanking my chain? After talking to a Houston, Texas resident this past week it sounded like the people that were displaced by Hurricane Katrina had plenty of weapons. Maybe they should start a weapons for cash program. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
That is why. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
That's not cheap. I keep my thermastat set at (in winter in MN) about 58-60 when I'm home and awake and about 53-55 at night and when I'm at work. It's cheaper to put on a couple of sweat shirts than it is to heat the place. More money for jumping. Same. That is why they make blankets. (But then again many people have called me cheap. I like to tell them I am trying to be a minimalist and conserve resources since I do spend plenty of money on things that I need or really want.) "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I consider that resourceful! Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle to save Resources! "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Why do Darwinians share 75% of their genes with pumpkins?
-
Stop talking nonsens, dude - if you don't know what you're talking about, it's better to STFU I do know what they are talking about. I think it is based in fantasy and not reality. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Stop taking the blue pill and start taking the red pill, it will help to regain your grasp of reality. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Is the welfare program and enabler program? (Do people receive welfare because they can not work or do people not work because they can receive welfare?) "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Do you have any statistics to prove that wealthy farmers are the ones receiving the majority of subsidizing? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
YEs there sure is... Welfare is keeping poor people alive with help for those who in most cases have nothing.. own no property etc... but are too stupid to keep their dicks in their pants so they have flocks of children who can then guarantee them more money from the program. Farm subsidies are paid to.. USUALLY large landowners who own vast tracts of land... and are paid to plant certain crops or not based on what the Agriculture Department feels will help the economy. Many times.. those landowners are multimillionaires.. but are VERY well connected politically. Do you have any statistics to prove that large farming corporations (making millions with government connections) are the ones receiving the majority of subsidizing verse small family farms? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch