I would like to say, "Get all of the facts" before printing. First of all, the videographer did NOT follow dive plan and deploy at assigned altitude. The other skydiver in question is an talented skydiver, and followed dive plan. What you may NOT know is that among other things, the video parachute blew up, causing a violent side spin. The article printed in the "Dropzone.com" is in error, and despite how people feel personally about MIchael Hawkes, it was a very safe place to skydive. I say was because of the current conditions to "fun jump" there now. Low man DOES have the right of way and when tracking or shooting videos, we need to be aware of our surroundings and who is below us. When it comes down to it, we are responsible for ourselves. We need to remember when it comes to deployment, that we let everyone who might be near know that we're going to deploy and if we're above someone, take appropriate action. I have read the article, and am appalled by the apparent disregard of facts given the family's attorney. But, then again, that's his job. Don't be so quick to judge until EVERYTHING is out in the open.