
DanG
Members-
Content
6,580 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by DanG
-
AGW - Evidence that will Convince me of the danger
DanG replied to lawrocket's topic in Speakers Corner
Has anyone frozen to death so far because of this? Do you really think the plan is to cut off power before alternate sources are on-line? - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
I'll say that all day. It has no meaning to me. Well, that's not exactly true. It has meaning to me in that it makes me sad we still don't have separation of church and state. - Dan G -
AGW - Evidence that will Convince me of the danger
DanG replied to lawrocket's topic in Speakers Corner
Who, exactly, is being killed by our response to climate change? - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
Seriously? Next time you post anything, expect to be asked to cite verse and chapter from proceedings under penalty of perjury. - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
Illegal wiretapping has harmed countless people. How can you seriously claim that the police have never violated wiretapping statues and wrongly prosecuted someone? Just trolling again as usual? - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
It's harmful because the Constitution is what men and women are willing to die for. I thought that's what Americans valued most. I guess I was wrong. Sad. - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
So, the ends justify the means, huh? Brilliant. - Dan G -
Should you surrender to the police? (watch video)
DanG replied to CameraNewbie's topic in Speakers Corner
Disgusting. Read rushmc's sig line some time. - Dan G -
If she runs...will Hillary Clinton become the next president?
DanG replied to Dantes's topic in Speakers Corner
I'm guessing you either don't understand Obamacare, or don't know what a single payer system is. Which one is it? - Dan G -
Fucking hilarious. That's exactly the scenario the lefties were concerned with in 2008. But, of course, your paranoia is completely rational. - Dan G
-
Riots over a shoting turn into free jordans and 40's
DanG replied to Anvilbrother's topic in Speakers Corner
And if he didn't say anything people would complain that he went golfing while the country burned. He can't win. - Dan G -
Riots over a shoting turn into free jordans and 40's
DanG replied to Anvilbrother's topic in Speakers Corner
Which point does that prove? Setting off bombs during a protest is a lot different than indisciminate rioting/looting. - Dan G -
Former leader of ‘gay cure’ group marries male partner
DanG replied to ryoder's topic in Speakers Corner
Obviously he caught the gay from being around all those queers. I suspect the conversion people will start getting into Ebola suits before going to do their important work. - Dan G -
He's trying to say that he knew it was illegal only if monetary or other tangible gain was involved, but for some reason he can't bring himself to either say that directly, or shut up about it. - Dan G
-
Obama: 'I'm Going To Do What I Can Through Executive Action' On Immigration
DanG replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
In his post he says he used #2 on his list. He's a big brain PhD type of dude. - Dan G -
Obama: 'I'm Going To Do What I Can Through Executive Action' On Immigration
DanG replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
Are there any other parts of the Constitution you don't believe in? - Dan G -
Obama: 'I'm Going To Do What I Can Through Executive Action' On Immigration
DanG replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
Legal immigration is practically impossible unless you have a PhD or are a millionaire. - Dan G -
Maybe we're not communicating clearly. I thought you were implying that they should switch engines because of the break-up. That makes no sense. If they don't have an engine that can do the job, then obviously they need to improve it. But this test was intended to see whether the whole system, including the engine, would work together in a flight environment. They'll get what engine performance data they can, and use that independently. If the engine didn't perform to spec, then it needs to be fixed. If it did perform, then it passed the test. Tests have multiple objectives. You can meet none, all, or some of them, but often times they are independent. - Dan G