DanG

Members
  • Content

    6,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. The voters decided in 2008 and again in 2012. If Hillary wins the general are you going to say that the 2020 voters should decide instead? - Dan G
  2. Boogie woogie woogie woogie - Dan G
  3. Holy misquoting Batman! The quote you provided is NOT from Snopes! It is quoted by the Snopes article. The quote is from dennismichaellynch.com. From his own website: So, in short. Nice try, but no cookie. - Dan G
  4. Well, yeah. But at other times he says he doesn't condone violence. It's kind of like when little Jimmy goes to the Principal's office and says that bullying is bad, and he will never do it again. RushMC would point out that Jimmy specifically said bullying is bad, why do you keep harassing him for bullying. He said he doesn't condone it! - Dan G
  5. Yeah, keep believing that. So anyway, was the guy who punched the protester being led out by the cops in the right? Simple question, yes or no answer. I'd say no. - Dan G
  6. Shortly followed by: Which is it, dude? Either you know what happened to get the guy punched, or you don't. Many of the Trump "protesters" have just stood silently while he spoke. Should they be arrested for disturbing the peace? Should they get pushed around and hit? What was I supposed to respond to? I responded to every line in your last message except the stupid playground shit at the end. I guess the Bundy Ranch and occupation of the Oregon wildlife office don't count. Source? Besides Trump. I'll try to not 'mind read' but I think most people reading this are laughing at you, not me. - Dan G
  7. Peace? At a rally where ten of thousands of people are yelling and cheering? DTP is a law in search of a crime. Once they are asked to leave, then they could be arrested for trespassing if they don't comply. DTP is bullshit. Huh. I though you really hated it when people 'read your mind'. I guess it is okay when you do it to others. And, for the record, I don't think protesters should ever be arrested with disturbing the peace. That would be anti-American. If Hillary suggested that her protesters were beaten up, and offered to pay legal fees for beating her protesters, I'm pretty sure Hillary supporters would be appalled. All of the candidates have had protesters. None have advocated having them beaten or arrested. None except Trump. Nice made up fact. Is the guy who punched the protester at a recent Trump rally a leftist Democrat supporter? - Dan G
  8. Charged with what? - Dan G
  9. I'm guessing the hot chicks get buzzed more than the fat dudes, so it is not entirely random. - Dan G
  10. Hmm, this seems like an odd reaction from a candidate who claims he doesn't want violence as his rallies: Trump is a dangerous monster. - Dan G
  11. That's the best you got? It is too well written to be real? Please. - Dan G
  12. Obviously there are crazy people on both sides. You sound like you think it's okay for Trump supporters to be crazy because anti-Bush people did it first. Interesting take on BDIF. BTW, the same guy was featured in two of your pictures. - Dan G
  13. DanG

    Zika

    You spout your beliefs here constantly, but when someone challenges you, you got nothing. I was trying to have a discussion, but you don't have anything to say, as usual. - Dan G
  14. They have been wrong about the Republican primary electorate. In polls where the respondents are likely presidential voters, he doesn't do well at all. - Dan G
  15. Touche. I should have said only one person has defended their vote for him, namely turtle. And he says he will only vote for Trump because Hilary is evil. I believe a lot of people in the US are in favor of Trump because they think he will shake things up, although they don't really know what they want shaken up. I also believe that come November, the number of people who are totally disgusted by Trump will prevent him from winning the Presidency. We will probably have a record low voter turnout in the general, but the people who are passionately against Trump will outweigh the people who are passionately for him. At least I hope so. - Dan G
  16. I think one person has said they will vote for him. Many have said they would never vote for him. Perhaps you are seeing what you want to see. - Dan G
  17. DanG

    Zika

    I haven't disregarded the idea altogether. On the contrary, I've thought about it quite extensively. Sorry you don't feel the need to respond to the substantive point. I thought it might be interesting. - Dan G
  18. DanG

    Zika

    I don't "dig" any religion. I do appreciate your trying to imply I am anti-Semitic because Jesus was a Jew. Makes a lot of sense. The logic is pretty clear. If, as you believe, Man has an innate desire to search for God, why have men across the globe never independently come to the same conclusion about the nature of God? If he were real and omnipresent, and Man had the ability to feel his presence (as followers of your religion believe), then people all over the globe should have felt his presence in the same way since the dawn of time. They don't. People in India feel the presence of many Gods. So did people in ancient Roma and Greece. Other people felt the presence of spirits in natural objects, but no single spiritual force. You can argue that some societies misinterpreted their sense of His divine presence, but to argue that they all misunderstood God's nature except the Jews doesn't make sense. Sorry about your finance, but that's a terrible analogy. Her brain tumor is not all powerful and desiring of the love of mankind. It doesn't have a spiritual presence which can be felt by man throughout all space and time. - Dan G
  19. DanG

    Zika

    You make no sense. Why is denying the existence of God selfish? And back to my other point. If there were one true God who was constantly sending prophets down to the people, why wouldn't at least some of those prophets tell the same story? I can buy that some of them were charlatans or deluded, but all of them except Jesus? Did God really decide to only reveal himself to the Jews about 2000 years ago, and only that one time? In every human He implanted the desire to know God (according to you) but refused to give them any information about himself? Instead, he let hundreds of false Gods propagate through the non-Jewish world, and then punishes the ancestors of those people when they don't convert? Talk about selfish. - Dan G
  20. DanG

    Zika

    Which is an excellent argument for why there is no diety. If there were, all these civilizations would have come up with the same God. Since none of them independently came up with the same God, there is no God. - Dan G
  21. You said you'd vote for Sanders over Trump, but Trump over Clinton, and the main reason you've given is her lying. If you really prefer Trump to Clinton, it appears that being a big fat liar really isn't your problem. - Dan G
  22. DanG

    In the flesh

    I went to a great school. I have the best words. - Dan G
  23. He doesn't drink, but he sold Trump Vodka and owns Trump Winery. Let's face it, American evangelicals don't give a shit about a person's morals as long as they say they are pro-life, anti-Muslim, and anti-immigrant. - Dan G
  24. DanG

    In the flesh

    I don't know what you're talking about. The women, Hispanics, blacks, and Chinese love Trump. They love him. He, after all, has done more for equality than anyone. - Dan G
  25. Well, what you actually said was: Sounds to me like you are suggesting that electing a woman president would result in shooting ourselves in the foot. But words don't matter around here, so I guess you were really just trying to ask a non-biased question. Sort of. But anyway, I don't think the ramifications would be significant at all. Other countries have elected females, and I don't think there have been any ramifications. Why would the US be any different. If their human rights are so bad, maybe we should discontinue air regardless of how the president's genitals are configured. - Dan G