DanG

Members
  • Content

    6,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. The tweet is factual but still shitty. - Dan G
  2. Gimme a good blaster... - Dan G
  3. Long time jumper (who shall remain nameless) two rules for life: 1. Balls don't touch. 2. Don't jump in costume. Good luck. - Dan G
  4. A private company adjusting your search results is okay, as long as they are up front about it. The government doing the same is not okay. - Dan G
  5. If black students want to self-segregate into private housing, that's their right. The university shouldn't be doing it for them in public housing. - Dan G
  6. YAY! He's back! I don't know how we all got by without your insightful comments for like a whole week. So, in your vast, international experience how many jumpers have you known that have been killed, paralyzed, brain damaged, or otherwise permanently injured? And how many people do you know that suffered the same fate from other activities? The clueless feeble old masses want to hear your wisdom spoken. - Dan G
  7. Do the male students also sit on the TI's lap, or just the cute female ones? - Dan G
  8. It's a valid question. What is not great about America that used to be great? - Dan G
  9. You guys realize you're talking about a TV show, right? - Dan G
  10. Did you read the first article? If you did I'm not sure how you can still claim that Clinton violated State Department rules with her private server. - Dan G
  11. As you might suspect, I strongly disagree with your assessment of Trump. He has no integrity. This has been shown time and again. He can't work with anyone, because as soon as someone disagrees with him, he lashes out. He has some foreign experience as a businessman, I'll grant you that. He has absolutely no policy experience, not sure how you can seriously claim otherwise. He is far from the smartest person in the room. Loudest, most bombastic, biggest bully, sure. Smartest? Hardly. Clinton, on the other hand, has some of the qualities I listed, but has definite problems in others. Integrity is a problem. I don't think it is as big a problem as some make it out to be, but she's had some issues. I think she has shown she can work across the aisle based on her time in the Senate. She has tons of policy experience. She has tons of foreign experience. She has no military experience, like Trump. I think she is quite intelligent. I'm not sure how well she takes advice from others, but she certainly doesn't throw a Twitter tantrum when someone disagrees with her. - Dan G
  12. I think integrity is important. Lack of real (as opposed to manufactured) scandals is probably the best measure of that. Consistency in doing what one says and saying what one does is also important. Being able to work well with everyone across the political spectrum. Policy experience, not necessarily political experience. Foreign experience. Someone who has traveled, learned another language, has a less parochial view of the world. Military service can be a plus, but I wouldn't want a career military officer who hasn't done anything else. I also want my President to be the smartest person in the room, but be able to take advice from other people. - Dan G
  13. Considering the last three SOS used a similar personal server, I'm not sure your premise is true. - Dan G
  14. Your very first post said this: He's asking you for a link to that FAA website you referenced. Why is that so hard to understand? - Dan G
  15. Noobs are always talking about skydiving is so safe. Eventually most people change their tune after they know a few people who have gone in or become paralyzed or brain damaged. Some never change their tune because they are stupid. - Dan G
  16. Grow up. I know you think you're winning the internet, but you're just making yourself out to be a dick, and an annoying dick at that. I'd start down the path of what the duties of a supervising rigger are, but the discussion would be wasted on you. You already know everything. - Dan G
  17. OK. Like I said, I give up. It doesn't matter. You people win. - Dan G
  18. Not really. Not if you actually look at what the law does. - Dan G
  19. The irony is that Adkins is against sex between two males, and then he went and committed a sex act on another male. Can you really not see the irony? - Dan G
  20. What does that have to do with it? Is he indebted to the entire white race because his adoptive parents were white? Can he not speak out about injustice because he is rich? I don't think he's being particularly productive, and I don't agree with his methodology, but you're way off base calling him a racist because his parents were white. - Dan G
  21. A. What the fuck is a SJW? B. I'm not a liberal, I'm just not a conservative who thinks all black people are whiners for complaining about racism and should STFU. - Dan G
  22. Write better. That's a choice you make, not an absolute. Gangbangers are expected to be out killing other gangbangers. If you think the rational voices aren't talking about that already it's because you've decided to close your ears. Cops are not supposed to be out killing anybody. It's a regrettable consequence sometimes, but it seems like it is the first instinct for a lot of cops. I think most people in the black community are more worried about getting harassed, beaten, and falsely accused than they are about getting killed. I'm a white middle aged man in a nice neighborhood, I don't have to worry about it at all. Way to be unnecessarily rude. Like I said before, classy. - Dan G
  23. Your logic is illogical. So if a rational voice suggests that racism might be an issue in police conduct your response is STFU because Jesse Jackson is a dick? I think we can do better. - Dan G