
DanG
Members-
Content
6,580 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by DanG
-
Google: Bush Administration Increased Requests for Content Removal
DanG replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR POINT???? Is that question clear enough for you? Stop trying to be clever, and tell us what your point is already. - Dan G -
Google: Bush Administration Increased Requests for Content Removal
DanG replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Then what's the point? BTW, other posters really shouldn't have to ask what your point is when you start a new thread. - Dan G -
Google: Bush Administration Increased Requests for Content Removal
DanG replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
If you thought that, you not only need to read the link you post, you should also read the text you type. - Dan G -
Google: Bush Administration Increased Requests for Content Removal
DanG replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
You really should read what you forward. The article is very vague, but the only part that might have anything to do with the Obama Administration is in the last paragraph regarding requests for user data. The requests for content removal apparently came from police and local governments. But, as usual, don't let (your own) facts get in the way of a good Obama bash. - Dan G -
Yes, you have defeated my with your superior pedantry. Tally ho. - Dan G
-
Sorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. Everyone who was alive at the time knows the lies that got him in trouble related to his relationship with Lewinski. It's really not in dispute. - Dan G
-
Nice try. When he perjured himself he was being asked specifically about his relationship with Monica Lewinski. You're full of it, just admit it. - Dan G
-
He was testifying in the Paula Jones case. Here's one for you: What was he testifying about? - Dan G
-
Caucasian Americans For Obama - Can't find the website
DanG replied to davjohns's topic in Speakers Corner
Believe it or not, I did that on purpose. Read the post I was replying to. That poster clearly thinks all black people are just a big lump of "other". - Dan G -
Caucasian Americans For Obama - Can't find the website
DanG replied to davjohns's topic in Speakers Corner
In contrast to the many things Mitt Romney has in common with them... - Dan G -
Jesus fucking Christ. The lies he told under oath were about ML and the BJ. I never said he got in trouble for getting a BJ, I said he got in trouble for lying about the BJ. In the same way, the Zimmermans are not in trouble for having money, they are in trouble for lying about it. Try reading what people say sometime. It would save us all a lot of trouble. - Dan G
-
Work on your reading comprehension skills. I said upthread that perjury is perjury and is wrong. The simple fact is, Clinton lied about his relationship with Lewinski. That what the impeachment and subsequent censure were about. - Dan G
-
Like I said, he lied about getting a BJ (technically multiple BJs). From Lewinski. - Dan G
-
I think you should refresh your memory. Relevant passage from wiki: - Dan G
-
What did Clinton lie about? Maybe my memory is failing. - Dan G
-
Perjury is perjury. She perjured herself. Period. So did Clinton, although I would argue that Clinton should not have been forced to testify against himself in the first place. Either way, why is lying about a BJ different from lying about a bank account? I thought is was you right-wingers who were supposed to believe in moral absolutism. - Dan G
-
And I don't recall right wingers claiming that lying under oath was no big deal then either. - Dan G
-
"Go ahead, make my filet." - Dan G
-
Are you equally offended by, "John Doe was killed in a car accident?" Someone had to be driving the car. Why is the media demonizing cars? Admit it, you have a quick trigger when it comes to gun issues, and may be seeing things that aren't really there. - Dan G
-
I will drink my beer in shame, alone and sobbing. - Dan G
-
What about, "driving erratically" or "unsignaled lane change." You can't prove you didn't do one of those things. It's his word against yours, but once you've been pulled over, papers, please. This law is ripe for abuse, and the ill effects will be against law abiding citizens, not just illegal aliens. - Dan G
-
Would you prefer, "killed by pellets/slug penetrating the body at a high rate of speed due to very recent ejection from local shotgun, said shotgun recently ejecting the pellets/slug because someone activated the shotgun's trigger mechanism?" I realize everything relating to guns not put out by the NRA is assumed to be anti-gun, but I really fail to see why, "killed by shotgun blast," is inaccurate. The blast was the direct reason for the victim's death. How about if all news stories were edited to say, "killed by shotgun blast which was the result of a person pulling the shotgun's trigger?" I think most people can make that leap all by themselves. - Dan G
-
They all say, "killed by shotgun blast" not, "killed by shotgun." Big difference. - Dan G
-
Yeah, but a lot of places arrange their "Spring Break" around Easter. That would have to stop. I agree, I just wonder if the author feels the same way. Sure, but he's talking about celebrations. Under this guy's rule, you couldn't celebrate an event if it didn't directly relate to American nationality. Sounds a little overly nationalistic to me. - Dan G
-
I'm wondering what celebrations he's alluding to. Some people think MLK Day is a holiday that celebrates blacks. Is that what he's talking about? Maybe Columbus Day celebrating Italians. Ah, I know. It's got to be Cinco de Mayo. I bet the writer hates that. He probably doesn't mind St. Patrick's Day nearly as much. For that matter, how would the writer deal with Christmas and Easter? They are not American nationality based celebrations. I'll bet his school would still get those days off. - Dan G