SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
That there will be a continued escalation in the negative effects we see from climate change.
-
Your three points are meaningless as standalone points. They only have meaning when you start forming a thesis or an opinion around those points. So, what is your thesis?
-
Don't know, where did Kavanaugh get the money to pay hiss debts?
-
No, just beam it to earth when and where needed. As already indicated by others, logistics are a real problem in war situations. Hence why the military would like to get away from shipping it by ship, rail, truck, or pipeline.
-
And they continue to work on it. Recent success story: https://newatlas.com/energy/us-navy-beams-1-6-kw-power-kilometer-microwaves/
-
From that list I see where you get your logic from. Just a bunch of statements, but no discussion on why that statement matters or how it correlates to the "problem". Since this is the Ukraine war threat, let's tie the two issues together. Imagine if you can harvest energy in space and then beam it to earth to be used. "Unlimited" renewable energy without issues like clouds or darkness.
-
What makes you think a majority of skydivers are in any way interested in protesting any of these things?
-
Sure there are. But, many kids often indicate that they cannot see what they would need math for in real life. There is benefit to using references to examples outside of the "pure sciences" to make math itself more accessible.
-
Twitter stock as well as Tesla stock have been on a slide since the agreement was announced. Twitter is currently trading at $48.32 while the agreed deal is for $54.20 per share. That to me says there are a lot of people who doubt this deal will close.
-
Appears that your understanding of correlation and causation is as strong as your understanding of "pilling on" and "continue digging." Since you aren't presenting evidence there isn't much else to discuss.
-
I'll assume you are giving up on the previous one.
-
No. The fact that deaths from natural disasters are down doesn't necessarily prove that climate change does not have an adverse effect on deaths. Again causation and correlation. But I know that isn't very meme "own the libs" worthy.
-
You aren't showing men have learned to fly cause less people are dying from falling off buildings. Because deaths from natural disasters are down does not automatically prove that climate change is not leading to more climate related deaths. Again, you are failing to provide evidence of correlation. But, I don't think you actually care about this, science or anything like that. All you really care about is being able to laugh at memes that "own the libs".
-
Why would I want to refute that? I am waiting for you to provide evidence of the correlation and causation. You seem to think that less people dying from falling of buildings must mean gravity doesn't work, or people have learned to fly.
-
You have moved from an opinion piece to Facebook as the source, without seeing the irony.
-
You are rebutting my argument with an opinion piece without seeing the irony.
-
The problem is that the evidence you provide for your "facts" generally ends up not agreeing with you. So even when you think the "facts" align with you view, you tend to be wrong.
-
I can't wrap my head around the right wing celebrating Musk's potential takeover of Twitter as a triumph of free speech and the 1st amendment, even though the 1st Amendment never applied to Twitter. As well as, celebrating a state government punishing a company for expressing an opinion, which to me is a clear violation of the 1st Amendment. Another example of the right really having no interest in the constitution or freedom or anything of that nature. All they care about is power for themselves and punishing those who are either not like them, or do not like them.
-
Still calls for changes to avoid negative effects of climate change, just disagrees with the pace of it. That study doesn't agree with your standpoint that climate change is not negative, no changes have to be made and the there is a net benefit to warming.
-
Ah so your comment was just based on your general dislike of me and not based on the topic. Didn't have you pegged as a troll, but it is what it is. I don't understand how you are proud of something you have absolutely no control over, nor have anything to do with. But whatever makes you feel good.
-
Must be really hard for you when a black lesbian lives better than you do. Maybe if you worked a little harder, you too could have a mansion?
-
Didn't Brent take his family to Disney last year and was quite proud of that?
-
That link specifically says that Florida Republicans are telling Disney to behave and support what Republicans want or they will be punished. Thank you for clarifying that this is behaviour you celebrate.
-
What cash cow? The only reason this is happening is because Disney suspended political contributions.
-
What is more likely to happen is that Florida tax payers are going to have to pay more, Disney will remain profitable and a Republican politician will have moved costs from a corporation to the public. Not sure how anybody can support how Republicans stand for small government with these actions.
