SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    In that thread you post that you started hating him (Obama) on that day. Sure you can, it is reading comprehension that is difficult for you.
  2. SkyDekker
    Any radical extremist. Any version where a human being killed is seen as not a big deal.
  3. SkyDekker
    Which is exactly the mindset displayed by extremists. Their point of view is most important, those who do not describe to that and die are a non-issue.
  4. SkyDekker
    For that logic to be true, socialist and communist countries (in your view that would be Canada and all of Europe) would have to be extremely violent.
  5. SkyDekker
    Yup, just like they were cooked under both Bushs and Clinton....probably before that too. Yesterday the unemployment rate went up, while more jobs were being added. The unemployment rate going up would actually be a good thing in this case, since that means people who previously had given up, are now back out looking for a job. A simple number doesn't mean anything, without knowing what the methodology is.
  6. SkyDekker
    Thats not lying. Using a number that is calculated according to how you said it was calculated. THAT is lying. Thought professors were smarter these days.
  7. SkyDekker
    Enjoy Costa Rica. Was there a couple of years ago and had a great time. Great people!
  8. SkyDekker
    Probably wishing you paid a bit more attention in school.
  9. SkyDekker
    I never said the US would be the only factor that would have ever been an excuse. I just said that killing many innocent people would provide an excuses. You then said that they don't need excuses. Then went one to give all these examples of excuses, while asking me if I twist much. lol
  10. SkyDekker
    lol
  11. SkyDekker
    Ohhh, he must have discarded the stuff the US supplied him and only used what he manufactured himself.
  12. SkyDekker
    No, you are re-writing history As pointed out in the other thread, the historic facts show these people have been at war with themsleves and others since the death of their prophet That would be an excuse....above you stated they didn't need an excuse. Make up your mind which part you want to argue.
  13. SkyDekker
    True. Maybe it would have been a bit better place if the US hadn't sold him those chemical weapons to begin with. You have to wonder why those people aren't happy to see you liberate them after you supplied the stuff that gassed their family members....silly brown people.
  14. SkyDekker
    You are missing a very large part of history...or just are plainly ignorant if that is what you think.
  15. SkyDekker
    So Iraq wasn't a violent place before America went in? Depended on which group you belonged to.
  16. SkyDekker
    The point is more along the lines of: You are going to burn a lot of innocent bystanders who live in the areas occupied by ISIS. By doing so you are just creating the next version of ISIS.
  17. SkyDekker
    My question to you is this. If this was an american pilot what do you think obama would do? I think he would apologize to them like the raging pussy he is. But that's just my opinion. I don't know what Obama would do. I do know that his situation (politically) is completely different. My opinion is that Abdullah isn't doing this because he is "bad ass" or anything along those lines. He is doing this to keep his job, his country and very likely his head. Obama wouldn't have to deal with those concerns. Those concerns can be pretty powerful driving forces behind decisions. http://clashdaily.com/2015/02/breaking-obama-christians-just-like-islamic-radicals-burn-people-alive/ A top commenter on that site: Is that you? lol
  18. SkyDekker
    What is missing is whom and what you are quoting from.
  19. SkyDekker
    ISIS using children as sex slaves and suicide bombers says nothing about: The truth about Islam our elites willfully ignore
  20. SkyDekker
    I would like to think that I would think first and then act in what I think would be the best course of action to reach an objective. I am old enough to know that emotion sometimes gets in the way of reasoning. I try to recognize that. Just napalming all of Syria doesn't reseolve anything though.
  21. SkyDekker
    No it isn't. He wrote on his blog that the number is a big lie. Which is true. That number was the same big lie under Bush x2, Clinton etc. Fox added the bit about Obama and the SOTU speach. Figuring people with reading comprehension problems would bite on the Obama bash. Fox must write for Gallop? http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx?utm_source=WWWV7HP&utm_medium=topic&utm_campaign=tiles Really nuts how Fox stuck the "White House" in gallops sight So where did Gallup write about Obama and the SOTU as in the Fox piece? Gallop indicates that the White House is happily using the number to score political points. Which is true. Fox ties it to a part of the SOTU speach, accusing Obama of lieing about what the number means. Two different things. Gallop is right. Fox is trying to use it to bash Obama. Silly. I now get the sense you will never understand the distinction, so I am done trying to explain it to you.
  22. SkyDekker
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/02/04/united_nations_report_isis_iraqi_children_sex_slaves.html Absolutely awful. Also has nothing to do with what we are talking about. But that is somewhat "par for the course" with you.
  23. SkyDekker
    Sure Bill Clinton is another example. Thank you for helping me point out that the morale superiority claimed is pretty bogus!
  24. SkyDekker
    No it isn't. He wrote on his blog that the number is a big lie. Which is true. That number was the same big lie under Bush x2, Clinton etc. Fox added the bit about Obama and the SOTU speach. Figuring people with reading comprehension problems would bite on the Obama bash.
  25. SkyDekker
    My question to you is this. If this was an american pilot what do you think obama would do? I think he would apologize to them like the raging pussy he is. But that's just my opinion. I don't know what Obama would do. I do know that his situation (politically) is completely different. My opinion is that Abdullah isn't doing this because he is "bad ass" or anything along those lines. He is doing this to keep his job, his country and very likely his head. Obama wouldn't have to deal with those concerns. Those concerns can be pretty powerful driving forces behind decisions.