SkyDekker

Then you have to stop with the other side of the coin too. Do construction workers killed in the workplace get tax payer funded funerals, with processions and parades where they get lauded for being heros?

Unless they have permission from the landowner I would think that information is illegally acquired. Is it? That's a good question. Most search law applies to searches by "the government" (Law enforcement usually). This would fall under "invasion of privacy", I would think. Parking lots, even on truly "private property" (stores, malls, ect) are considered "Private property held open for public use" and have certain laws that do apply to them and others that don't. For example, you can't be arrested for driving drunk on private property, but you can in a mall parking lot. However, you can't get a speeding ticket (but you can get a "reckless driving"). And to muddy the waters even more, it's a community college. Which may classify as "public property." I really don't know. It's been a long time since I took "search & seizure" law. Usually businesses need "permission" to do business on somebody else's property. I would assume that this collection of data for profit on somebody else's property would need permission from that property owner.

You say this like it is a bad thing?

Nah just interesting to see some one who argues non-government interference to the extreme now is looking for the government to fix something. Laws are getting implemented. People get deported. Most just think it doesn't happen enough, or to the right people. UNless you are willing to spend billions, if not trillions of dollars, there will be illegal immigration. Specially when their is a large demand for their services. Not sure what you mean with Canada's requirement for illegal immigration? Like the US, immigration is illegal when it isn't legal. Don't think that requirement changes much.

Just a comment - I won't venture an opinion on the amnesty until I observe the economy and society for a couple years now that it's happened (no conclusions without data, only theories) Bold mine say that as an American about the US and you'll get totally driven out of town and tar and feathered - and much of the time by people from countries with immigration rules that you'd think would be sympathetic the short of it is that most all developed countries have standards and rules for immigrating legally - but it seems only the US gets bashed on trying to do the same (or do I just not hear about the others?) Shouldn't the free market correct for this automatically? If this was so important for Americans, wouldn't consumers be willing to buy products at a higher price point if manufactures/produced without illegal labour? If your own society didn't have such a need for cheap products and labour, there would be no, or at least a much smaller, market for the illegals. Why is the government getting blamed for the fact your own people cannot abstain from the products, services and labour provided cheap by illegal immigrants? Where is the personal responsibility?

Unless they have permission from the landowner I would think that information is illegally acquired.

Always ironic to see those who tell black people to act like white people when they complain about being treated differently......complain about being treated differently.

Always shake my head when Americans say "We don't negotiate with terrorists". They have either watched a little too much hollywood, or are just extremely naive.

Israel of course is NOT a signatory...interestingly enough.

Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted.

Then I guess you believe that your intelligence agency were completely incompetenent. Or, you believe that google is compromised, and that frontpagemag.com has it all right.

Seriously? Google can't be trusted, I may have to look it up on frontpagemag.com Other than that, your dig at Billy was entire uncalled for. Lawrocket said it much better than me. There is no need for it.

I think he is very funny yes. You can join the lie off competition with him and fox. He has pointed out 50 lies from Fox. Maybe you can help your buddies out and find 50 lies his show has made? Since your posts about Bush lieing, you have proven you do not recognize a lie when it is fed to you Like I said before. Either Bush lied or your entire intelligence apparatus was grossly incompetent. Turns out I have more faith in your institutions than you do. Quite the patriot you are!

Google can't be trusted, we should turn to beacons of knowledge like frontpagemag.com. Thank you for ending any option of a normal debate early!

I think he is very funny yes. You can join the lie off competition with him and fox. He has pointed out 50 lies from Fox. Maybe you can help your buddies out and find 50 lies his show has made?

It is like you repeating what you read on newsmax or fox because you honestly believe they couldn't be wrong.

Wendy I am not making any comment on the validity of the story posted and a hit piece is a hit piece but, I have yet to see anything close to the 60 minutes (or CBS news for that matter) level of the nuke plant piece or GWB's gaurd records No credibility left I take it you haven't seen the 6 second vine with 50 lies? lol

No. Does every thread have to turn in an Obama thread? One comment about obama and suddenly its an obama thread yet jcalor can talk all the shit he wants about texas and nobody says anything. hypocrites. Probably because Texas is relevant to the issue. Since the congresman is from Texas.

Seriously?

Except that the taxation has nothing to do with price volatility.

Seriously?

There is some fine Alabama logic!

Let's look at the impact oif the lies: Obama and Hillary lied after 4 Americans died. Bush lied and because of that lie, 5,000+ Americans died. Clearly we need a 9th congresional hearing into Benghazi.

First he will use an Executive Order to stay in power longer: http://realnewsrightnow.com/2015/02/28/obama-to-issue-executive-order-extending-presidential-term-limits/ That there is some fair and balanced real news!

I have been in many courthouses where police officers (there to testify) and uniformed bailiffs (working the courtroom) routinely have their service weapons in their holsters in courtrooms while in-custody criminal defendants, some who are seriously dangerous dudes, are in the room just a few feet away from them. Same goes for courtrooms where domestic relations cases are being heard (where, believe me, there's a huge potential for violence between attendees). Gives me the willies every time. When I worked the courts in The Hague in the early 90s both police officers and private security worked the courts unarmed for that exact reason.