SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    So you are against free speech I take it?
  2. SkyDekker
    Yes Grand Juries tend to deliver what the prosecutor wants.
  3. SkyDekker
    http://patriotpost.us/posts/38839 When Ben Carson is near the top of the polls for the Republicans, it probably isn't the right time to try and make fun of Liberal logic.
  4. SkyDekker
    Why such a lack in comfort with grand jury decisions? Some here have held up grand jury decisions as clear proof people are innocent.
  5. SkyDekker
    Never seizes to amaze me how many stupid people there are.
  6. SkyDekker
    It's what keeps boiling to the top. I promise you, if there was a start over with new canidates button in elections I would have pushed it just about every time. So which one was Bush?
  7. SkyDekker
    When I was in high school a kid in class got up, took a claw hammer out of his bag and caved the teacher's skull in. This was well before youtube. Didn't even get reported in the paper. Just because you can find more information about it, doesn't mean it is happening more. Was he inspired by this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Streleski I highly doubt it. This was pre-internet and stories like that would not have been widely reported internationally. Never mind the decade or so in between.
  8. SkyDekker
    That is exactly the problem, people seem to think those are the only two options.
  9. SkyDekker
    Everything you don't agree with is worth questioning. Everything you agree with is not worth questioning. Maybe take a couple of months and look at things the other way around.
  10. SkyDekker
  11. SkyDekker
    So the journalists are doing their job, trying to create wealth for their shareholders and Republicans complain about it?
  12. SkyDekker
    So you ignoring data i provide is different tha n data you provide (in general) Got it The "data" you provided was: Which is not exactly well sourced. As soon as I see a complaint to Bill about the same I will pay attention to your comment here Oh wait No I won't Considering you responded you did pay attention to his comment. Even now you can't be honest.
  13. SkyDekker
    Ya, and then there's Trump who doesn't seem to be particularly religious, nor homophobic...so what does that tell ya? Being "stupid" has become desirable. How often do we hear: "I don't agree with him, but at least he says exactly what he thinks". Now people vote for politicians whom they don't agree with, but say stupid things in public. I am sure that is a wonderful recipe to get a strong government.
  14. SkyDekker
    When I was in high school a kid in class got up, took a claw hammer out of his bag and caved the teacher's skull in. This was well before youtube. Didn't even get reported in the paper. Just because you can find more information about it, doesn't mean it is happening more.
  15. SkyDekker
    One can be non-monogamous and still be able to do that. Those aren't mutually exclusive. Quite frankly I think monogamy puts a lot more strain on a relationship than most other things, specially when it takes forms where partners are not able to openly discuss their wants and desires.
  16. SkyDekker
    No he hasn't. He would have done better putting his inheritance in a savings account.
  17. SkyDekker
    I'll take the bait. IMHO, it is very likely some form of life (bacterial, single cell, multicell) exists elsewhere in the universe. But if you believe there is intelligent extra terrestrial life, the burden of proof is on you, not me. Not really, one could just believe it, have their opinion without a need to prove it to anybody...
  18. SkyDekker
    Make the penalty harsher. The penalty for what? If the death penalty doesn't deter murder, not sure that will really help much?
  19. SkyDekker
    This isn't about what I want to do. This shouldn't be about what anybody else wants to do. This should be about honestly defining the problem and then trying to come up with things that can be done to help reduce the problem.
  20. SkyDekker
    The plot more or less was discovered. It could have likely been stopped. Sharing of information was one portion. There is no doubt that the pre-occupation with Iraq was another.
  21. SkyDekker
    There is absolutely no evidence to prove that not having lung cancer gives lung cancer to other people. What are you, some kind of lung cancer alarmist? 1st stage of deniers - it doesn't hurt anyone, that's a myth, absolutely no evidence 2nd stage of deniers - it actually helps people, it's soothing 3rd stage - ok, it hurts, but it's more dangerous to drive a car for goshsakes Final gambit - since you don't have cancer, you have no right to talk about it or be worried about it seriously, man, how many pullups did you even do today? pfff Do you even lift bro?
  22. SkyDekker
    There is absolutely no evidence to prove that not having lung cancer gives lung cancer to other people. What are you, some kind of lung cancer alarmist?
  23. SkyDekker
    Sorry, your logic is way off here. You are right that simply and arbitrarily making it harder to purchase a gun will not solve the problem. That still doesn't take away that the easy availability of guns is a large contributing factor. Honestly, I have more respect for people saying that pretty much has to be true, however that shouldn't change for the US due to the 2nd Amendment, therefor we may try to look at some other possible solutions.
  24. SkyDekker
    Please...... My grandfather smoked 3 packs a day until he died at 65, but he never got lung cancer.
  25. SkyDekker
    We do not yet know WHAT EVERYTHING ELSE IS as of right now This site points this out time and time again And we also know that when it comes to climate NOTHING EVER STAYS THE SAME!!! LMAO Which doesn't dispute the science though. Not knowing what everything else is, doesn't mean that when none of it changes, global temperatures would increase if CO2 levels increase.