-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
Agreed. Lady's choice. Disagree. My choice. Ladies choice is other side or somewhere else. None of my wives have ever objected....
-
Fuck those dirty beaners. Seig Heil. Fuck that nigger. I'll let you guess if these are comments from a Trump rally or a Clinton rally. Quite frankly, it is an absolute disgrace this is what is loudly spoken at rallies supporting the Presidential nominee of 1 of 2 major parties in your country.
-
McCain does the right thing. How about it, McConnell?
SkyDekker replied to kallend's topic in Speakers Corner
While I have yet to see my ballot, I am confident on who will be listed. Oh, I could write in someone but I consider that a wasted vote. What will you ballot have for choices? Jerry Baumchen PS) We know you strongly dislike her; but she is the nominee. Time to put your big boy pants on & get over it. 4 Main candidates so far. You think Jill Stein is a major candidate. Major as in, has a chance of winning? -
Decent meat, little fatty. Served in the cafeteria of Parliament. Not that most Americans would understand a culture other than their own. I mean, it is easy to think that everybody wants to be American. Who wouldn't want to be led by Trump or Clinton?
-
This might be very hard for to believe for Trump supporters, but not everybody needs to be told what their opinion is.
-
Wouldn't that make their son an anchor baby? Don Yes, and according to Trump's previous comments should be deported with the mother. Now, really the baby would have the US citizenship through the Father being American. But, Trump didn't like that argument when it was raised with regards to Obama, whose mother was American and whose father wasn't illegal.
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Don't worry, Trump will be more careful when he imports Melania's replacement in a few years. As I mentioned in the other thread, base don his own statements he should be deporting his own wife and child. -
If I remember correctly Trump spoke out against any process that would allow illegal immigrants to become citizens. I also believe he spoke out against birthright citizenship. I am sure he will have Melania and his kid deported.....
-
If true, immigration fraud is a federal crime without a statute of limitations. Of course Mrs Trump at one point being illegal isn't a problem, just a wonderful manifestation of the American Dream. Not like she is Mexican or Muslim. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/was-melania-trump-an-illegal-also-argh http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/melania-trump-immigration-donald-226648
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Even if that is true, that is a problem. One would hope that a president of a major country is able to control his emotions and anger a little better. -
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Considering there are multiple versions of Sharia, from differing schools, with differing opinions, this too is false. It seems that, according to Mr. Khan, (the present discussion is about Mr. Khan) there is only one version. And this is a problem. A big enough problem justifying Trump's attack on a family who have lost a son fighting for nothing but American ego? And before you react to the last part, Iraq was no threat to the US or any of it's freedoms. -
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Considering there are multiple versions of Sharia, from differing schools, with differing opinions, this too is false. -
Interesting you would say that about a comment, which is clearly meant to take stupid reasoning and taking it to an extreme. Did you not recognize the stupid reasoning in the post I reacted to? Kallend summed it up rather succinctly. Do you agree with the reasoning?
-
Exactly! My words tried to shine some light on that. But maybe you didn't get the meaning of the words. At least you understand words have meaning, so there is that... Alarmist probably spread anthrax just so they could get an article about climate change.
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
So Sharia is completely at odds with your laws and constitution with incompatible and irreconcilable principles, but the application of Sharia is fine as there is no conflict with US law. -
Yes I agree, but in the text in your original post they did not say decades of a steady rise in temperature caused the melting. They said a lingering heatwave caused the melting. So why do you post the consequences of "climate" change and not the consequences of "weather"? Let's say we define a heat wave as three subsequent days over 30C. Let's say average temperature in July for a particular area in the world was 26.5 degrees in 2010. Now, let's say average annual temperature increase in that area, partially related to climate change, has been 1.5C. Now, is a July with an average temp of 32C in July 2015 with 10 consecutive days over 30C only a weather event, or could climate have some part in this discussion as well?
-
You seem to be implying that it's OK for a cop to kill someone because they are deaf and can't hear the "orders" or they are autistic and don't understand what is going on. Do the police not have any responsibility to assess the situation and determine if there is an actual threat, beyond a failure to instantly comply? Don England last night is a pretty decent example. Mentally unstable man with a knife, killed one and wounded others. British police used a tazer to apprehend him. I have no doubt in the US this man would have been shot. Not all cops here have tasers. But they all do have guns. Even then, people have died after being tased. People have died from positional asphyxiation after being handcuffed. I guess with your logic that means we are better off shooting people than handcuffing them.
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Israel has incorporated parts of Sharia law for their Muslim population. Really no reason why people cannot voluntarily agree to arbitration under any set of principles, be it Sharia, Halacha, Canon or anything else. Bullshit. If two muslims draw up a prenuptial agreement according to Sharia law, it would be upheld by US courts. -
Don't think his ego would allow for that voluntarily. He would have to be forced out somehow.
-
You seem to be implying that it's OK for a cop to kill someone because they are deaf and can't hear the "orders" or they are autistic and don't understand what is going on. Do the police not have any responsibility to assess the situation and determine if there is an actual threat, beyond a failure to instantly comply? Don You don't think 2 seconds is long enough for a 12 year old boy to comply? Officers claim they asked Rice to put his hands up and he didn't comply. In the video above, the police car comes to a stop at 0:19, and by 0:21 the boy is already doubled over and falling to the ground, mortally wounded. Rice was rushed to the hospital, where he died Sunday morning. gawker.com/video-cops-shot-12-year-old-two-seconds-after-arriving-1663814827 Yup which then gets labelled a justified shooting and cops can tell us it really isn't that bad and these are just platitudes.
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Ohhh, scary. Sharia. Did they mention anything about Halacha, or is only Sharia scary? -
You seem to be implying that it's OK for a cop to kill someone because they are deaf and can't hear the "orders" or they are autistic and don't understand what is going on. Do the police not have any responsibility to assess the situation and determine if there is an actual threat, beyond a failure to instantly comply? Don England last night is a pretty decent example. Mentally unstable man with a knife, killed one and wounded others. British police used a tazer to apprehend him. I have no doubt in the US this man would have been shot.
-
“You say shit like that, and then people will buy into it.”
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
Not if your candidate wins. Then they will be allowed to walk around, as long as they wear their identifying mark and don't wander too far from their house. You know, for National Security. Then as a way to raise employment, we will get some people to ensure that all Muslims follow those new rules. To set them apart from the regular police, maybe they can wear some dark brown shirts, maybe with orange epaulettes. -
More platitudes, now that's surprising. The fact police is referring to those incidents as platitudes sums up why so many have issues with the police.
-
Ya think? I'm talking specifically about media outlets, social media, and the truth no longer mattering. Yet, for decades cops have been able to get their stories "straight" after every incident. Is that the truth mattering?