SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. Yeah I should have reworded that. They have started doing some. Personally don't think it is anywhere near enough. But, time will tell.
  2. That is not the media's job. That is up to the person itself to educate themselves. You appear to be trying to blame other people's ignorance on the media, while the problem is the ignorance.
  3. I get what you are saying. But this is where you lose me. Editorials are specifically subjective. Secondly, I stated before. There is a strong perception issue with regards to LEO. The majority of your posts on this subject are towards blaming that on the media. If you think the media is solely responsible for that perception, then you will have a rude awakening in your future. Unless LEO starts proactively dealing with the issues that DO exist, in stead of continuously claiming it isn't as bad as people think, the struggle will continue.
  4. How many people with pneumonia like to spread their contagion all over children and groups of people? Sounds pretty irresponsible to me. Then again - she. Really doesn't care if she infects someone else, does she? Or - is it a ruse? She would lie to us would she? Maybe it is just allergies - oh - yeah she DID lie to us and say it was allergies. WTF is it going to take for her to tell the truth? Is she even capable? That's some idiotic troll level spin. Are you capable of communicating without it? Yes. But you wouldn't be able to fully understand it if I did. There is simply too much bias on your part to make understanding and critical thinking about the subject impossible. Any legitimate point would be lost in your shield of liberalism. So you admit you are posting idiotic troll level spin. Thanks.
  5. No it would require that heaping tablespoon of assumptions. From that sentence that is simply not known. Wilson did shoot and kill him. Are you claiming that is not correct? He was unarmed. Are you claiming that is not correct? The prosecutor did announce Wilson would not face charges. Are you claiming that is not correct? You need to add your bias and assumptions to get outraged over this factually correct paragraph. Calling it gross negligence is utter and complete bullshit.
  6. How many people with pneumonia like to spread their contagion all over children and groups of people? Sounds pretty irresponsible to me. Then again - she. Really doesn't care if she infects someone else, does she? Or - is it a ruse? She would lie to us would she? Maybe it is just allergies - oh - yeah she DID lie to us and say it was allergies. WTF is it going to take for her to tell the truth? Is she even capable? That's some idiotic troll level spin. Are you capable of communicating without it?
  7. Total and utter bullshit. The quote you provided is factually correct. You clearly don't understand gross negligence. You have to take that paragraph, add a heaping tablespoon of assumptions to get to the "outrage" you have displayed over multiple posts. And what protections are you talking about? Reporter's privilege? That whole concept has nothing to do with unbiased reporting and everything to do with investigative journalism. Like I said, stop blaming other people and take some responsibility for your own actions.
  8. No it doesn't. The Fairness Doctrine was removed by the FCC under Republican leadership. Uhm no. Unbiased and untrustworthy are not the same thing.
  9. Probably the clearest evidence there is no god.
  10. That is capitalism. Always amazes me when I see staunch republicans complain about capitalism. Again, stop blaming other people and fix your own issues.
  11. So what about him going silent because he got distracted by a girl?
  12. Whether it is or not really isn't the point. If there weren't so many questionable incidents with such a long history, the story in the paper wouldn't matter. Keep blaming the media, god forbid you would look at any actual issues.
  13. Yup like I said, a big issue between LEO and civilians. You can keep blaming the media or take some responsibility.
  14. Neoliberal terrorism lol You know that Your hero Rumsfeld made a lot of money with Monsanto. Is he a liberal terrorist? I'm beginning to think more and more that you are the furthest thing from sober. Nobody could be that clueless can they?
  15. Um, have you seen who the Republican nominee for president is? He wasn't nominated by the majority of the Republican party. I know! Weird huh! And the President isn't elected by the majority of the people. Yet Americans keep telling us you have the best country and the best system in the world. Which on is it?
  16. Trump goes silent on interview because he is distracted by a girl: http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/09/larry-king-donald-trump-russian-tv-erin-intvu.cnn
  17. Did Johnson have secret service personnel rushing towards him when he tried to answer? I missed that clip, please link. No. You are exactly right. He was able to recover on his own. He didn't need someone to remind him to speak. Now I understand why you like Trump so much. You prefer people to just babble and don't care if what they say makes sense.
  18. If the perceived threat was only verbal, why did the Secret Service rush the stage? The President makes almost no snap decisions. You have probably watched a little too much Hollywood produced content.
  19. Did Johnson have secret service personnel rushing towards him when he tried to answer? I missed that clip, please link.
  20. Yup, tried to fix it, but that isn't working either.
  21. Fair. That's your average American. I would hope that Presidential candidates are held to a higher standard. Would hope that a presidential candidate knows about Aleppo, it has been in the news rather frequently and major atrocities have taken place there. Maybe a little less in the US where reporting on Trump's hands appears to be more important.
  22. Sorry, what? No really....please help me with this one. I'm trying to figure out how he's not a paid denier. As in just like these people who you SUSPECT are promoting climate change just because of cap and gain profits (who you therefore won't listen to), here's a guy who ACTUALLY gets paid to deny climate change and yet you'll listen to him. https://www.google.com/?ion=1&espv=2#q=who+is+%22Anthony+Watts%22 Yes, but he himself says that isn't true, on a website. So there!
  23. Source and full article; https://theintercept.com/2016/09/07/google-program-to-deradicalize-jihadis-will-be-used-for-right-wing-american-extremists-next/ As much as I hate the KKK and neo-nazis (which is a LOT), are we okay with US corporations playing internet mind control games with US citizens? I mean, let's face it, US corporations play mind control games every day with advertising, but something about this strikes me as wrong since who is to say where this eventually leads to? Might lead to people not mindlessly believing what they see on a website.
  24. If you aren't a Clinton, you get jailed for about the same, if not a lesser extent, offense. Who has gone to jail for mishandling classified information? Patreaus certainly didn't. I can find something about a guy taking pictures of the inside of a submarine, but don't really find similarities with Clinton.