SkyDekker

Why would I comment on that if the investigation hasn't finished yet. Aren't you the one always saying how we should wait for all the facts to come out. Or is that only in cases where black people get shot? Why did the president hire so many people who turn out to be criminals?Wasn't his main selling point that he was the best judge of people and would only hire the best people?

And exactly none of them have anything to do with Trump collusion or Russia. It was illegal investigation to start! What is wrong with just following the law? Whatever you think about the investigation doesn't take away that Trump campaign officials were guilty of breaking the law. So, what is wrong with just following the law? You have asked this many times of other people.

Clearly an investigation that leads to multiple indictments, guilty pleas and convictions is a joke and a waste of time. What is wrong with just following the law?

Trump: 3,000 lies and counting since inauguration Rush: I love Trump Rush: I really hate Hillary and Obama because they lie Nothing like some honesty.

Sigh, I am not surprised you wouldn't understand the difference, nor am I going to expect you to educate yourself. However, for other people who might be reading. The "victory" wasn't narrow, the SC issued its verdict on narrow grounds. Its verdict is around the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showing an impermissible hostility toward religion. The court did not rule on broader scopes such as under which circumstances people can be exempted from anti-discrimination laws based on religious views. it also didn't touch on some other facts in the case, such as if baking a cake is considered an expressive art and therefor protected under the first amendment.

I agree. Taking it easy on China and Russia while taking a hard line stance with your traditional allies is honest bargaining. should I put an /s somewhere?

For national security reasons. yup.

That FB clip was posted by the MARS Special Operations Group. The main point is we do not like Obama or his former administration. We share various forms of entertaining news to support our emotions. Attached is another one. Anger takes many forms of expression. It is a tactic you people, liberals, use often. Then get your nickers in a swivet when it comes back to you. We are still in a culture war with plenty of insanity on both sides. This thread has drifted based on my one comment that President Trump's tweet made sense to me, creating an intolerable position for y'all to handle. That fact that I understand is something you people cannot understand. So basically you don't care if it is real or not, just as long as it allows you to be angry at black people. Yeah, I think most of us already knew that about you.

fair enough.

I had a discussion on Facebook yesterday with somebody who refused to admit the attached was photoshopped. To her it was clear evidence that Obama bowed to traitors. her son used to post here and has very well thought out opinions, but she would not budge. The propaganda machine in the US is extremely powerful it would appear.

I think you are missing the part where the drugs were given to women without their knowledge or consent.

Interesting. I got banned for calling out racism against my son. I was told that since my son wasn't a member on these forums it could not be a personal attack. Has this rule/policy changed?

Yeah, they know. What a surprise, your group of friends are retarded idiots. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/make-america-more-islamic-quote/

You are intimately familiar with firearms, and the laws governing them in the USA. You have no familiarity with having one of your children fall victim to random gun violence. Or with the advantages countries with reasonable gun laws enjoy. Like not having motorists waving firearms at them in road rage incidents. Oddly enough, I do have a marked familiarity with random violence that drops children, have lived in sundry countries that have laws that I suspect you would term 'reasonable.' I have been spared any incidents involving motorists waving firearms in road rage incidents; the only motorists that have ever made firearms known in my experience have been cops, and I have had the odd submachine gun stuck in my face (as I GINGERLY pulled out my passport...). I don't count the .380 slug that hit my windshield, since it was from long enough range to be arbitrary. Your guess regarding my familiarity is entirely wrong. Should I trust your instincts about much of anything else? And yet you would think such an esteemed scientist like yourself would understand that anecdote and data are not the same thing.

And if you use the code REMEMBER, Donald will give you 25% off in the store!!

With China making $500 million contributions to Trump branded developments and expediting Ivanka Trump's trademark applications, you might be barking up the wrong tree.

Americans are more mentally defective than other Western cultures? Cause I am pretty sure people outside of the US suffer from mental health problems.

Texas politicians are now suggesting that doors are the problem in school shootings. You can't make this shit up.

Who cares? He is against brown people and that is all that matters for people like Ron.

That's pretty clear to most.

We see enough people here who constantly need to be corrected because what they are posting is simply incorrect. That means that campaigns to sway opinion and votes are definitely working.

Bullshit, you did it for 8 years under the Obama administration. At least have the balls to stand for something, after all these years you'd think you would have found a way to grow a backbone. Don't they teach that in your military? IMO Ron's ideological stance is fairly established although it may seem confusing. Think a Swiss model of limited international engagement and set of interests. A Christian set of ideals towards others he has direct interactions with. For others, its up to them to look after themselves. A personal choice of residence allows an almost complete restriction on outsiders intrusive ideals. Or interference with his life choices. Feel free to correct me If I'm mistaken. You're not mistaken, however you're not talking about the same thing that SkyDekker was - specifically the bit about "taking others' inventory." He was hugely concerned with all sorts of real or imagined aspects of Obamas personal life and behaviour yet claims not to care about any of that when the conversation concerns Trump. When challenged he changes the subject to talk about how much of a winner Trump is. When challenged on why that didn't apply to Obama (who was clearly also a serial winner) he changes the subject again, usually with some baffling non-sequitur involving whatever bit of research he's been reading for his amateur psychology hobby. The sad part really is that he clearly thinks he's being clever about it. This.

Not often people so clearly display they refuse to look beyond their echo chamber.

Bullshit, you did it for 8 years under the Obama administration. At least have the balls to stand for something, after all these years you'd think you would have found a way to grow a backbone. Don't they teach that in your military?

I asked him because he is generally has been against gun-free zones. Yet when the NRA had to provide a safe environment they reverted to a gun-free zone.