warpedskydiver

I must reiterate: The Republicans and the Democrats are the A and B squads of the same team. Their opponent? The people

Besides you being a very caring, kind and considerate person, who really does consider the welfare of others, you know you just wanna lick her puss.

disinter.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/wyoming-sheriffs-put-feds-in-their-place/ February 18, 2007 Here’s one the mainstream media isn’t going to tell you: County sheriffs in Wyoming are demanding that federal agents actually abide by the Constitution, or face arrest. Even better, a U.S. District Court agreed according to the Keene Free Press: The court decision was the result of a suit against both the BATF and the IRS by Mattis and other members of the Wyoming Sheriff’s Association. The suit in the Wyoming federal court district sought restoration of the protections enshrined in the United States Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution. Guess what? The District Court ruled in favor of the sheriffs. In fact, they stated, Wyoming is a sovereign state and the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers exceeding that of any other state or federal official.” Go back and re-read this quote. The court confirms and asserts that “the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official.” And you thought the 10th Amendment was dead and buried — not in Wyoming, not yet. Bighorn County Sheriff Dave Mattis comments: “If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to leave, or retain them in custody.” “I am reacting in response to the actions of federal employees who have attempted to deprive citizens of my county of their privacy, their liberty, and their property without regard to constitutional safeguards. I hope that more sheriffs all across America will join us in protecting their citizens from the illegal activities of the IRS, EPA, BATF, FBI, or any other federal agency that is operating outside the confines of constitutional law. Employees of the IRS and the EPA are no longer welcome in Bighorn County unless they intend to operate in conformance to constitutional law.” The implications are huge: But it gets even better. Since the judge stated that the sheriff “has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official,” The Wyoming sheriffs are flexing their muscles. They are demanding access to all BATF files. Why? So as to verify that the agency is not violating provisions of Wyoming law that prohibits the registration of firearms or the keeping of a registry of firearm owners. This would be wrong. The sheriffs are also demanding that federal agencies immediately cease the seizure of private property and the impoundment of private bank accounts without regard to due process in Wyoming state courts. This case is not just some amusing mountain melodrama. This is a BIG deal. This case is yet further evidence that the 10th Amendment is not yet totally dead, or in a complete decay in the United States. It is also significant in that it can, may, and hopefully will be interpreted to mean that “political subdivisions of a State are included within the meaning of the amendment, or that the powers exercised by a sheriff are an extension of those common law powers which the 10th Amendment explicitly reserves to the People, if they are not granted to the federal government or specifically prohibited to the States.” It appears to me that one office where the Libertarian Party should focus it’s limited resources is County Sheriff. The change that could be made is nothing to laugh at. Meanwhile, there are still a bunch of nuts wasting valuable resources supporting those that seek offices that will never be won.

Yes when wrongfully carried out, like most things wrongfully done, good plans used in the wrong scenario.

Get well soon!

Did you tenderize the venison with your front bumper?

ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iKTvbgBD4wAvysJWCK0LFWjV9VwwD8V3TPHG0 Ricin Possibly Found at Las Vegas Motel 1 hour ago LAS VEGAS (AP) — Preliminary tests indicate that a package found at a motel contained the toxin ricin, and seven people have been taken to hospitals, authorities said. Police were called to the Extended Stay America Motel on Thursday and retrieved a package from the motel manager that was determined to be a chemical or controlled substance, Officer Ramone Denby said. Two preliminary tests indicate it contained ricin, he said. Results from further tests by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and a second local lab are expected Friday, police said. Homeland Security officials joined local police in the investigation. Officials from the FBI, Las Vegas Health District, a hazardous materials team and the National Guard were also at the scene. Officers cordoned off the area and isolated the room where the substance was found. Three motel employees and another person were quarantined and decontaminated at the site, then taken to hospitals for further testing, Denby said. All appeared to be in good condition, he said. Three police officers who had been exposed were also taken to hospitals. It takes between six and eight hours for someone exposed to ricin to show signs of contamination, Denby said. A woman who answered the phone at the motel declined comment. Ricin is made from the waste left over from processing castor beans, and can be extremely lethal. As little as 500 micrograms, or about the size of the head of a pin, can kill a human, according to the CDC.

I agree without any hesitation. McCain is a War Hero, and a POS when it comes to our rights.

I mean hey, I could have used a .308win, but then it would have passed through, downed an airliner, then blown the International Space Station apart, before obliterating the Moon, then traveling out of the Milky Way, and killing an entire race of beings in another galaxy, in a place, far, far away.

And result in a ban

I don't own a .45acp anymore!

Sportsmen for Obama? - Gun Control Quotes "Obama is proposing to make it a felony for a gun owner whose firearm was stolen from his residence which causes harm to another person if that weapon was ... http://www.sportsmenforobama.org/content/view/14/27/ - 19k - Cached - Similar pages Barack Obama on Gun Control Obama sought moderate gun control measures, such as a 2000 bill he cosponsored to limit handgun purchases to one per month (it did not pass). ... http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/barack_obama_gun_control.htm - 16k - Cached - Similar pages Barack Obama on Gun Control Principles that Obama supports on gun issues: Ban the sale or transfer of all ... Increase state restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms. ... http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm - 19k - Cached - Similar pages Barack Obama -- GOA 2008 Presidential Candidates and the Second ... The concealed carry of firearms is another important issue for gun owners, and yet Obama is not only opposed to citizens carrying guns, he supports using ... http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm - 13k - Cached - Similar pages Front Sight, Press » Blog Archive » Barack Obama on Gun Control Obama is talking about banning ALL SEMIAUTOMATIC firearms. That would include all Glocks, 1911’s, Ruger 10/22 rifles, and self loading shotguns. ... http://www.snubnose.info/wordpress/news/barack-obama-on-gun-control/ - 41k - Cached - Similar pages Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions - Associated Content Mar 4, 2008 ... Check out Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions - Submitted by Kris B at Associated Content. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/630645/barak_obamas_gun_control_positions.html - 41k - Cached - Similar pages Digg - Barak Obama's Gun Control Positions An Examination of Barak Obama's positions on gun control. http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Barak_Obama_s_Gun_Control_Positions - 30k - Cached - Similar pages Obama's Gun Control History - Topix Feb 19, 2008 ... Obama outlined his anti-gun plan that includes increased penalties for the interstate transportation of firearms. ... http://www.topix.com/chicago/2008/02/obamas-gun-control-history - 53k - Cached - Similar pages Obama Gun Control - MapPoint Forums Not to get political , but I wanted to point out this use of MapPoint to show the effect of one of Obama's proposed plans for gun legislation . http://www.mapforums.com/obama-gun-control-7175.html - 33k - Cached - Similar pages The Volokh Conspiracy - Obama and Gun Control: Obama outlined his anti-gun plan that includes increased penalties for the interstate transportation of firearms. The maximum penalty now for bringing a gun ... http://volokh.com/posts/1203389334.shtml - 158k - Cached - Similar pages And that was just the first page in a google search

Obama has already stated he intends to bans all semi-automatic firearms. Clinton has made statements as to returning to her husbands "common sense" approach on firearms restriction. They all seem to forget that their own votes, and statements are the very rope they shall be hung by.

No real improvements were made to the property in order to demonstrate adverse possession. Wood chips and or landscape gone over the line and wood piles are not real improvements. To leave such expendable items such as firewood and or wood chips or even stone is not demonstrating possession. Littering is not possession. The lot was properly surveyed, and in fact was recorded in a subdivsion plat. It was awlays known that the land did not belong to them, the markers of the property need not be visible, as quite often the corners of the property are marked with iron pipe driven to below the soils surface. Even with the laws written as they are, I see no evidence that an effort was made to demonstrate open and notorious adverse posession. Some of you may think I am wrong, but I remind you that I am a Land Surveyor, trained in the division of, and determination of the proper ownership of land, you are not. You may as well argue that you understand being a physician and the treatment of patienst without being a Physician, or Nurse Seems the judge was in quite a rush to hand over a lot which is platted and in fact a city lot, not a meets and bounds property with an ambigous perception as to ownership. Items beginning at #17 are quite damning to the tresspassers. Colorado law seems to be written in such a way that is in favor of ignoring platted land,or lots, in favor of open theft of land.

"We must be able to arrest people before they commit crimes. By registering guns and knowing who has them we can do that... If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime." -Vermont State Senator Mary Ann Carlson They want to be able to round people up without their having committed crimes, and guns make it harder to do that. "If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees." -President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993 "You know I don't believe in people owning guns, only the police and military. And I'm going to do everything I can to disarm this state." - Michael Dukakis, then governor of Massachusetts, in conversation with Mike Yacino, MA Gun Owner's Action League, and Roy Innis, CORE, June 16, 1986 When only the police have guns, it's called a police state. The gun-violence problem is more than the problem of guns in the hands of bad people. Its also a problem of guns in the hands of good people." -Dennis Henigan, Gun control attorney, quoted in a New York articale by Peter J. Boyer. Houston Chronicle, May 24, 1999 Once again, the gun grabbers reveal their true intents; they don't care about preventing crime and saving lives, they want us disarmed so they can run their evil agenda against us unopposed. "No, we're not looking at how to control criminals ... we're talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns." -U.S. Senator Howard Metzenbaum, 1993 "I don't care about crime, I just want to get the guns." -U.S. Senator. Howard Metzenbaum, 1994 And again, they come right out and admit it. "Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal." -U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, December 1993 Again, when only the police have guns it's called a police state. And that's what they want. "I don't believe anybody has a right to own any kind of a firearm. I believe in order to obtain a permit to own a firearm, that person should undergo an exhaustive criminal background check. In addition, an applicant should give up his right to privacy and submit his medical records for review to see if the person has ever had a problem with alcohol, drugs or mental illness... The Constitution doesn't count!" -John Silber, former chancellor of Boston University and candidate for Governor of Massachusetts. Speech before the Quequechan Club of Fall River, MA. August 16, 1990 The Constitution doesn't count? That's why they've been steadily attacking it with their unConstitutional laws and why the mass media has been villainizing guns piecemeal to brainwash the sheeple with their propaganda. They want the American people to be totally helpless and subservient, entirely dependent upon their "benevolent" masters. They want to rule and always rule, never to be overthrown or ousted. Same thing the Nazis and Soviets did as soon as they had any power. "Assault weapons... are a new topic. The weapons' menacing looks, coupled with the public's confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons." -Josh Sugarmann, "Assault Weapons: Analysis, New Research and Legislation", March 1989 An admission of the lies and propaganda filth they spread to further their agenda. "It is also interesting to note that the top officials of Handgun Control Institute are gun owners themselves. They also intend on keeping them. It's other people's guns that bother them..." -Mark Urbin Yes, the elite party members will get to keep their guns, but the unwashed masses had better be dependent upon the protection and goodwill of their masters, or else. How many high-profile members of Handgun Control Institute, the Brady Campaign, and Million Moms have been arrested for illegally being in possession of firearms (often with drug charges as well) or even murder? I don't know, but quite a few. The VPC even has its own FFL; what they were doing with it, who knows. Another rifle caliber, the 30.30 caliber, was responsible for penetrating three officers' armor and killing them in 1993, 1996, and 2002. This ammunition is also capable of puncturing light-armored vehicles, ballistic or armored glass, armored limousines, even a 600-pound safe with 600 pounds of safe armor plating. It is outrageous and unconscionable that such ammunition continues to be sold in the United States of America. Armor-piercing ammunition for rifles and assault weapons is virtually unregulated in the United States. A Federal license is not required to sell such ammunition unless firearms are sold as well. Anyone over the age of 18 may purchase this ammunition without a background check. There is no Federal minimum age of possession. Purchases may be made over the counter, by mail order, by fax, by Internet, and there is no Federal requirement that dealers retain sales records. --- Senator Edward Kennedy, New York (February 26, 2004, Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Congressional Record, (Pp. S1634-5) Setting us up for banning "sporting" arms once they've gotten rid of the semi-auto guns and handguns. Why these bolt-action and lever-action rifles are more powerful than the evil assault rifles we banned just a few years ago! Many of them are designed as long-range, high-power uber sniper rifles capable of killing a man from over a mile away! We should immediately begin regulating the sale of these weapons and establish common-sense restrictions on caliber, ammunition capacity, and the allowed magnification of telescopic sights! And those lever-action rifles fire almost as quickly as semi-auto rifles! Outrageous! They are now the weapon of choice for criminals everywhere! "If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that these people have these weapons at all!" ~ Rep. Henry Waxman, D-NY, 5/2001 MSNBC report on .50BMG rifles. Ah, we again come to the heart of the matter. They're not concerned about crime, they're concerned with people fighting back and defending themselves and their rights against tyranny and aggression. They're worried that THEY might become targets for angry Americans because of their immoral and unConstitutional legislation. Pleasant thoughts for some I suppose.

Another T.E Lawrence quote. Please don't let that rather large chap bugger me in the ass again, Oh no, here he comes again!

Dick and Edith are entitled to a very defined path, one that leads to a financial solution to make the Kirlins free of tresspassers, to feel unincumbered, or free from duress due to their actions. "THE ROAD TO THE POOR HOUSE"

I would think that the appellate court decided to remind the case back to the original court due to one simple fact. Case law did not support this decision, and it was so obvious that the appellate court did not need to rule on it, but rather remanded to force the original judge to remedy this by applying the law to the letter. In other words, the original judge fucked it up, so now he can fix it.

Step 1:Find out which advertiser or programmer wrote the code that allows the tracking cookie to be passed to the users of the site. Step 2: Contact said programmer or company representative. Step 3: Issue a cease and decist letter.

If the judge rules in favor of the tresspassers, he will be setting a dangerous precedent in case law. From then on all tresspassers will have a legitimized claim to others land merely by breaking the law regarding unlawful entry upon lands.

Just remember what I said about what the law of adverse possession is designed to remedy. It is for solving a mistake. The tresspassers bought land in a recorded subdivision. They got a plat of survey. They knew what land was theirs and what was not. They did conspire to steal land through the fraudulent use of a law. They admit to tresspassing since 1982 on land that they knew was not theirs. They are entitled to something through court. They are entitled to make reparations, including all court costs and lawyers fees to the Kirlins.

Hey mate, if I choose to go, half of your guests may just boycott.

How? I just checked it again for you.

Actually it is "thou shall not murder". The transalation was faulty and in fact has been cleared up by Hebrew scholars.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2008/04/01/dnt.judge.talks.blacks.wsb Personally, I think he meant well and did the right thing, but went about it the wrong way. He will be crucified for telling them the truth. IMHO But then again he did do something that could be viewed as racist, only he was complaining about the actions of his own race. They will make a huge deal about this. The media and black leaders will give him the Bill Cosby treatment.