jakee

International? What more proof do you need that he’s a Bolshevik pawn of the globalist new world order elite?

I think we'll see a similar wave of blubbering 'hard men' leaving court after sentencing as you guys did after Jan 6. But for some more immediate karma, please enjoy this modern art piece entitled "Rioter gets hit in balls with own breezeblock"

Do you? Says who?

While the Chechens have a deserved reputation for viciousness, are they actually any good? My take was that they're effectively a provincial militia under a mad warlord without even the discipline of the Russian army.

And let me see if I've got this right - he told the story about a helicopter accident to show how well he knows Willie Brown, Kamala's old mentor... but not only was there no incident, he was actually on the helicopter with Jerry Brown?

He was asked if he was worried about Kamala's rally, he responded by saying he had bigger crowds than Martin Luther King. Yeah, he's not worried at all.

His governors website does say he was a CSM… and he was. He did the job. He was addressed by the title. He wore the rank on his uniform. He was a CSM, then after retirement he wasn’t anymore. His governors website does not say he carried a gun in war.

Never fear, Musk will sort it out... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp35w0kj2y4o

That's a great point and all, except for one tiny thing which is, err... why?

And to be honest, is it? Someone you truly believe will follow through on their threat holds a gun to your head and says they'll paint the wall with your brains unless you eat a chunk of shit... is there anyone here who is seriously going to stand on their principles of hygiene at that point? Like the political choice - you've got Trump with his stated aim of dismantling constitutional democracy, or 4 years of more kids learning about the truth of slavery in schools and a few more black people being hired in front of white prep schoolers. Is that a tough choice, even if you really, really, really think the white guys should get the job?

I guess it is tough to decide whether to take an imaginary problem more seriously than a real one.

Fool me once, shame on… shame on you. Fool me every single time… can’t get fooled again!

Does he realise that means even when he wins he’s a two time loser?

One that he hasn’t shot, so that’s a real plus.

When the American silver medallist cleared 5.90 he damn near tore his shirt off in celebration. Duplantis passed, then sailed over 5.95 with an arm's length to spare and looked faintly annoyed that some miniscule technical detail wasn't quite perfect. He's playing with different gravity to everyone else. Also its great for him that he's on a huge bonus every time he breaks the WR... but that means he only goes 1cm a time. He might reach retirement before he ever finds his limit!

No one could see it, it was so high up he was lost in the clouds.

That was a great race. The swimming woud have been a hot ticket too - even through the TV the entire crowd shouting 'LEON' every time Marchand's head came up in his breastroke races was insane. To be there would have been something else.

You totally missed where I said 'of a similar vintage' then, didn't you? Furthermore - the enemy isn't going to calibrate their force based on which generations of your own fighters you're comparing - they're using the best they've got. And whatever weaknesses they have - the fact remains that the USAF wouldn't contemplate sending a force of any type of F16s alone against enemy airpower without support from heavier fighters. That's the bit that matters, not some game of Block whatever vs Block whodjamaflip top trumps.

And there is an issue there. Provision of F16s is a huge positive for sure... but AFAIK the USAF would never contemplate sending a force of F16s into combat against genuine enemy air power without support from F22 or F15 heavy fighters. They have so much more power to spare, both to pump into much more capable radar and countermeasure systems and they can cruise much higher and much faster - particularly when heavily loaded. This means the pilots of those big boys have much better situational awareness meaning they can make better decisions sooner about what they're faced with, and when they need to they can shoot from much further away (the exact same missile performs much better with 10,000ft higher and 300mph faster head start). Now there's no way F22s are going there - there aren't enough and no-one else is trusted with them, even the Israelis and Japanese can't get an export licence and they've been begging. But F15s of a similar vintage would be a huge step up in capability, and would start to allow Ukraine to actually use some of the NATO doctrine we keep teaching them. F35 B/C models with stealth and far more flexibility on runway requirements would be good too, but they're still too new and too expensive to realistically expect anyone to be giving them away.

Lots of people protest about lots of things. It's part of living in a free country. But you chose to pick one vague and expansive group to label as Marxist, and none of us are any closer to figuring out why. Look, you made a very specific accusation, right? One that people are trying their best to understand. And from what I can see this is the fifth reason you've given that actually has nothing at all to do with the original claim. Now without trying to be at all facetious, these appear to be the five reasons you've given so far in answer to the direct question "why is 'woke' Marxist?" One: You don't know what it is. Two: You don't like lawyers. Three: WW1 set the conditions for the Bolshevik revolution in Czarist Russia. Four: There are too many minorities and it's confusing. Five: Islamic states tend to criminalise homosexuality. Now, in all honesty, do you think it's likely that anyone has the faintest idea what you're trying to say right now?

Fox would never compare a Democrat to Putin - they've put too much effort into training their viewers to think it's a compliment.

Which one of them used the woke agenda to call for Marxist policies? To be blunt - surely you can see at this point that the problem lies with you?

Remember the days of right wingers insisting that birtherism wasn't racist? I wonder if any of them believed it.

There's definitely a reason for that. Boeing up to the late '90s was a great company with a quality focussed culture, but since the upper management power struggle following the '97 merger it simply ceased to exist. Ever since it's been McDonnell-Douglas (who had a very shareholder fcussed culture) wearing a Boeing skin suit.

Why do you think wokeness is hard left? As said, MAGA is a populist movement that is quite happy to push Marxist economic policies that it thinks will play well with the crowd. Why have you specifically homed in on woke as being Marxist? What have they actually said or done that would qualify? And how do you know they were communist? Was it simply because they existed in a destabilised society? Or was it because they said and did communist things?