jakee

You know what, as soon as I read this post I thought "Huh, that doesn't pass the sniff test. Why would a political party endorse another political party's candidate? That sounds ridiculous!" So I looked (for like 10 seconds, by the way) and found this: The answer to your question is NO. In 2016 CPUSA did not have any candidates on the ballot, but nevertheless it does not issue endorsements of candidates of other parties. Sounds like your bullshit detector needs an overhaul. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Peer Reveille: Making sure scientists wake up in the morning. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

And what does that get us? NOTHING! OTOH we could have invested that money on schools roads and bridges, making a real difference in people's lives and moving our country forward. Stupidest argument ever. "Oh won't someone think of the children!" Yeah, you could have used that money on schools, roads and bridges... but you wouldn't have. You might have bought a few more F-22s, but doing something useful with it? Nah. Schools and infrastructure aren't underfunded because of the tiny investment in climate change and renewable energy - they're underfunded because the people who make the decisions don't think that properly funding them is important. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

How do you figure? Explain it, if you can. Use your words. (BTW, ..... lets everyone see how clueless and childish you are? It would be less embarrassing for you if you said nothing at all.) Look in the mirror my friend. Look in the mirror. I just looked in the mirror. I saw a guy who said that both Trump and the Hamilton actor were wrong to say what they did, and each of their statements reflect on their character. But you can't do that. You are still refusing to even consider judging both of them by the same criteria, simply because one is a Republican and one is (probably) a liberal. So what do you see when you look in the mirror? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

He never implied the cast wasn't involved. No-one but you thought he meant that. And given your well documented fight against the forces of grammar and spelling, don't you think it's more likely that you read it wrong rather than everyone else reading it wrong? Seriously? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So you're saying Trump didn't have the full picture on anything he said regarding foreign relations and homeland security? Not the wall, not Putin, not ISIS, not NATO, not Islamic immigration, not NAFTA, not trade tarriffs, not jobs in China... all of that is up for grabs? Everything could change once he's keyed in? So... if he's ditched the Hillary witchhunt as well, what exactly does he have left except ripping up the first amendment? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

He didn't? What facts were they? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

How do you figure? Explain it, if you can. Use your words. (BTW, you know how transparent you are when the only thing you can think to post is 'woosh' right? You know that it just lets everyone see how clueless and childish you are? It would be less embarrassing for you if you said nothing at all.) Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So you can't do it. You simply cannot, not even once, be balanced. You just can't bring yourself to apply the same standard to a Republican and a liberal. You don't even have to say that Trump is a sexist, you just have to retract your claim that the Hamilton actor is a sexist and you would at least be fair to the two of them. But no. It's never going to happen. You are what you claim to despise Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Clicky fixed. What's to explain? They're Neo-Nazi white nationalists, and they love Trump. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Oh really? The only thing you know about the Hamilton actor is that he didn't vote for Trump/Pence, and the content of those tweets. Yet, according to you, he is a racist, a sexist, and a 'perfect example of what people are in the Democratic party today.' His comments make him all of that, but Trump's comments (and associated accusations and settled lawsuits against him) don't make him anything at all? Not a sexist? Not a victimiser of women? Now you're delusional. You think no-one was criticising Breitbart News and Bannon before Trump started his campaign? Look at the response back when they first started supporting him - people thought Breitbart was dragging Trump down, not the other way around No, you're worse. You are the worst, most one sided partisan hack on this website, and you are the first and loudest to whine and bitch and cry like a baby whenever you think someone from the other side is being one-sided. You contribute nothing to this site but hypocrisy. Heck - prove me wrong, just once. Either admit that Trump's comments show he really is a sexist, or apologise for calling the Hamilton actor a sexist. Go on, see if you can do it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Further than he and the Republican party divided the nation by pushing it to the forefront of the national conversation for two years? Your statement reminds me of a joke I heard once... . . . "Yesterday was the campaign. Today you voted." So by analogy, the Republicans and Trump campaigned on the promise of dividing the country, but now think they can back away from it and hope the country isn't too divided already? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So he's not even in control of his own country yet, but thinks he can suggest who other countries should appoint as Ambassadors... Leaving aside the gross breach of etiquette, and leaving aside that he's suggesting the government should appoint someone who is in complete opposition to them, it seems like he doesn't understand that his Tweets aren't the musings of 'Donald Trump, private citizen' anymore, but the public statements of President Elect Donald Trump. What's going to happen the next time there's an ISIS attack, or a Russian invasion etc? Is he going to be out there tweeting what he wants to do, while the White House and Pentagon are working out what to actually do? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Further than he and the Republican party divided the nation by pushing it to the forefront of the national conversation for two years? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It would be hilarious if it wasn't so predictable! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

No, you made it pretty black and white. You did laugh at Trump's comments, here on this site. You did dismiss it as locker room talk. You did agree with the sentiment that 'every man does it'. Unless you have some reason not to remember posting these things (heck maybe you're always posting drunk and genuinely can't remember - it'd explain the lack of grammar and logic) then the above statement really makes no sense. You have no shred of decency. You accuse me of giving this guy a pass because he's a democrat when I haven't even given him a pass. I have not excused his tweets in any way. In fact, I agreed that they were a bad thing. You, on the other hand, defended Trump to the hilt over his sexist, predatory and abusive comments, have never said that there was anything wrong with them at all, and said they were a perfectly normal thing for anyone to say - but now are jumping all over this guy for saying a much milder version of what you said was perfectly normal. And why are you doing that? Because he's a Democrat, and you're a blind, partisan, hypocritical troll. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Is it? Who says? And that's not the question I asked. I asked IF the motives were different, would the comparison be false and you said "No!" Woosh! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Why? The story you said proved Quade wrong didn't say anything about the attitude of the cast or what they said to him. So what are you basing your opinion on? Nope. I think those tweets are pretty low - and while a political message should stand and fall on its own merit, he has certainly undermined his credibility and the impact of the message by writing or retweeting them. What media cool-aid? Trump said what he said, just like this actor said what he said. That is undeniable. There is no media twist to that. We can judge them on their own words. When Trump said what he said you laughed at it, you called it locker room talk, and you excused it as being ok, because it is something that every man says. And now this man says something much milder, though still sexist and offensive, and suddenly you've come to Jesus over sexual equality and are demanding the highest standards of PC speech. You're a living partisan cartoon character. A charicature of a hypocrite. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

What does that mean, and why is it relevant? So car registration and gun registration are completely different, because the motives are different. But gun registration and Muslim registration are identical, regardless of whether the motives are different. Thanks for clearing that up. It helps to be able to see the level of reason you bring to the discussion. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So, you're claiming that Quade only said that the cast's behaviour towards Pence on that night was gracious because one cast member has a history of offensive tweeting? That's pretty mindbending. Good job on redirecting to what is really important in the world though - the sexist statements of stage actors are obviously of much greater concern than the sexist comments of the President elect. You helped elect your sexist hero president and dismissed his (much more serious) sexist comments as 'locker room talk' and 'every man does it'. How can you possibly claim to be offended now, when another man (of zero political influence or concern) does it? Gutter hypocrisy Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Like licence plates register car drivers? It registers who owns the car. False comparison anyway cause the main purpose is money. So if the purpose behind the registrations is different, the comparison between Muslim registries and gun registries would also be false? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Like licence plates register car drivers? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So explain it to me. Why is it ok for you to show such contempt towards tens of millions of voters? Why does it not cover you with the stench of hypocrisy? Woosh......... It's like you are trying to find ways to show off how ignorant and clueless you are. Well congratulations, you've hit a new high score!

Luckily those thousands of Syrians haven't yet started walking over the atlantic the way they walked through the Balkans to Germany. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Why did you address it? No-one had said otherwise. You said it made Quade wrong - it doesn't. He was well aware of that Do you want to have an ideagasm?