jakee

There is a big problem with the 'apology' / defence of 'it was supposed to be a joke' in that making fun of groping someone is surely a huge contributor to normalising the culture of it being ok to grope people. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It's not the same universe. 14 and 17 is slghtly off. 14 and 32 is sick, predatory and quite rightly illegal in almost any country you would actually want to live in. No shit. Creepy isn't it? Unless your point is that it's not really a big deal that Moore groped and felt up 14 year old girls? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

And the Very laws that you propose and push would have made no difference yet again Wait a minute, I thought the last guy (Texas) wouldn't have been able to shoot anyone if the laws were enforced. What's the deal? To be fair, ‘if the laws were enforced’ is a different proposition to ‘if there were different laws’. Unless it was a law to make sure the law was followed Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Roy Moore has never before had the level of success that would make him a daily media presence in the lives of his accusers. When someone lie that is suddenly about to be one your senator, it’s far harder to ignore than anything else he’s previously done. Without that kind I trigger it’s quite unlikely for anyone to suddenly decide to come forward and rehash the past, especially when they know they’ll have to deal with accusations of being paid liars and other mysoginistic bullshit like the above. Secondly, it’s far easier to come forward after someone else breaks the silence. One of the women specifically spoke about how she had believed she must be the only one, until others came forward and she realised he was a serial predator who needed to be stopped. I wonder, if one of these women was in front of you would you accuse her of being a lying conspirator and a Democratic Party shill? Heck, you know at least one I then voted for Trump, right? You think it’s a long term undercover project? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

You're not paying attention. DJL is disputing the timeframe that was used by the experts you reference to try and recreate the shots. You simply keep coming back with more reasons why it was impossible for Oswald to have accurately fired three shots assuming the shorter timeframe. All those experiments are irrelevant if the timeframe is wrong. You have not provided one citation to dispute DJL's take on the timeframe, except for the last post where you clearly confused minimum for maximum It's like this: Bigun: It's impossible to eat two apples that quickly! DJL: There's strong evidence only one apple was eaten. B: The best eaters in the country tried to eat two and couldn't do it! D: But they could eat one, and evidence suggests only one apple was gone. B: There must have been a second eater for both apples to have been consumed! D: There weren't two apples. B: Dear lord what do I have to say? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That's a false analysis. There is nothing in what you just pasted that indicates the last two shots had to have been made in less than three seconds. What reason do you have to assume that he took the minimum physically possible time between the final two shots? But you haven't established that the three shots needed to be fired within 6 seconds. DJL has a convincing case that there was a much longer window between shots than you are assuming (effectively three full seconds vs half a second to aim after reloading) and you haven't even attempted to refute it, you're just ignoring it and carrying on with your assumption of the much shorter timeframe. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Shooting at unarmed deer overcomes the stress associated with being shot at by an armed human? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

You're not good enough shots to hit the bad guy every time but you are good enough to not hit any of the good guys, despite the hail of bullets from multiple directions in a crowded space? Is there a specific location in the church you envision the gunman standing to enable you to safely unleash this crossfire? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So where would all the bullets go? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

A source? From him? Yeah. Don't hold your breath. The hypocrisy of the Trumpettes is hilarious. True. However I looked this up and there is a sort of truth to it, but a truth around which a web of deceit has been woven. Initially it was said that Rosatom/Uranium One would not be able to export Uranium from those mines. but not because they were Russian owned, simply because the firm didn't have an export licence. They later started exporting Uranium when they were added to the export licence and distribution channels of another logistics company - one who already exported thousands of tonnes of Uranium per year anyway. Not quite sure why the stuff that comes from the Uranium One mines should be suspect when the stuff exported from any other US mine isn't. Anyway, that arrangement was in place from 2012 to 2014. But what if some of that Uranium did eventually make it to Russia? Well, it would simply join the thousands of tonnes of Uranium that the US was exporting directly to the Russian Federation anyway. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Haha awesome. ‘God told me not to’ is probably the best excuse I’ve ever heard for avoiding having to defend your gullibility. Cool! But you know you could still do that if you admitted you were wrong, right? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Just out of curiosity, do you think that this deal was actually a sale of Uranium from within our borders to Russia? No. But we do know that some went to Canada, the Europe and then from there no one knows The US exported nearly half a billion dollars worth of Uranium last year. Do you know where all of that ended up? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

As far as I’ve seen, that’s not what the negative reaction is about. The negative reaction concerns the timing, not the statement itself. Ya, because that's the real offense here! Let's make a big deal about his bad timing, while the sexual assault of a 14 year-old sits on the back burner. Lol, careful you don't pull a muscle with that stretch. There's no doubt what the big deal is. His show wasn't cancelled because he said he was gay. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

The point is that's how you choose what you believe. Does it give you the warm and fuzzies? Must be true! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Ohhhhh, ok. So you just didn’t give a fuck if it was true or not? So much better

To be honest the thing that surprised me was that he wasn’t publically ‘out’ already. Did anyone think he was straight? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

As far as I’ve seen, that’s not what the negative reaction is about. The negative reaction concerns the timing, not the statement itself. But I’m you you’d rather see it in a way the fits your ideology Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Yes. Not only will the coverage of these accusations and of Weinstein's fall will help to change the culture of Hollywood (and boardrooms on general), they are a symptom of that culture changing. This is how progress happens. For a long time certain behaviour is celebrated. Then it's just accepted. Then it's not accepted anymore. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Why are you eavesdropping on Normiss’s post? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

The article mentions how high up in google and YouTube search results these conspiracy theorists are. This is a major part of the problem now, IMO. A lot of these trolls aren’t whack jobs, but cyclical, money grubbing scumbags who know thy can make a lot of money from YouTube by pandering to the real nutjobs, and participate in and encourage the harassment of the victims as a way to create more and more traffic to their revenue generating videos. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So you think it makes sense to ignore issues that may change the lives of people you care about because billions of years after they’re dead the universe will end anyway? You’re a strange guy. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That’s a very long run. A very, very long run. Such a long run, in fact, that it’s utterly irrelevant. ‘Entropy’ (if you’re talking in end of the world terms) will never affect the human race, let alone anyone that has a close enough relationship to you to remotely care about. Global warming, if you accept it, will affect your children, grandchildren and great grandchildren. To me, that’s about as long a term as actually matters. But then I don’t care about god, which means I kinda have to care about people. I know you see the world differently. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It has been my experience that Christians tend to be independent and generally do not seek counsel from their ministers or pastors. Those that do, from discussions with the aforementioned, are unsatisfied women and those who consider themselves religious. I seek reality checks from people whom I respect and value their wisdom. An example would be my fellow counselor's when I was employed. Another would be the pastor or elders in my church. Wow, Ron, I didn’t realise you considered yourself an unsatisfied woman Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Exactly. Each of them one of the 4 anti-Trumpers. It's like you're making his point for him Do you want to have an ideagasm?

A) The Steele dossier is only one of many sources of information on Russian collusion by members of Trump's campaign and cabinet. B) That story does not mention the accuracy of any part of the Steele dossier. Do you want to have an ideagasm?