jakee

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    24,947

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jakee

  1. jakee
    Indeed, CRT is bullshit, institutional bias doesn't exist, now help us fight the Dems and their 100% rigged justice system!
  2. jakee
    But your definition of ‘unfairly attacked’ covers anything you simply choose not to believe, with no justification other than ‘because the media said it’. Which Trump has never done either. He’d rather talk about being a whale psychiatrist than ever give an indication that he’s changed his mind on anything. The only thing he’s ever backed away from is abortion, by taking up the dishonest position that anti-abortion laws have nothing to do with him. You’ll be aware of this, since you have also taken an intellectually dishonest stance on the state of abortion laws in the country.
  3. jakee
    Whenever you want to justify your own position you say this what the dems do, this is what the Reps do, And that matches what you want. Whenever someone makes a counterpoint you say information isn’t real, news doesn’t exist and no one knows anything about anyone. It doesn’t strike me as being very honest.
  4. jakee
    Or it could have bought Sam Bankman-Freid another house.
  5. jakee
    Cognitive dissonance is thinking you can't trust anything the media says because it;s just propaganda from Reddit memes, you also can't trust anything Trump and Vance say for the same reason, but that you're also sure you made the right decision and Trump and Vance are the right guys to do what you want done because you know what they're going to do.
  6. jakee
    It's not as simple as that unfortunately. There are plenty of people who think like that who are out there enticing women into relationships before letting loose with their darker impulses. Malignant narcissists like Andrew Tate who project power and confidence have no trouble attracting women, (more's the pity) and they teach people, kids mostly, how to do the same thing.
  7. jakee
    Right, you just voted for one. That's fine then.
  8. jakee
    That's great and all... but Trump is the most antagonistic candidate ever to run for the Presidency. Anyone who disagrees with him is a radical left lunatic actively trying to destroy the country. MAGA as a whole is so intolerant of other views they literally pretend that the people who hold them do not exist. Trump did not one single thing soften his approach after losing because he has never stopped pretending he didn't lose. Sure. That's a great example of how to approach people with different viewpoints. I can see now why you say the right is different in that regard.
  9. jakee
    How can you possibly think that is an answerable question? Yes. That 3%, sure. What about everyone else? In Afghanistan is the entirety of the Taliban made up of people with anti-social personality disorder? Or can 'normal' people be influenced to treat women better or worse depending on what they see around them to be socially acceptable?
  10. jakee
    Because you know you misquoted him to further your agenda but don't want to admit it?
  11. jakee
    He's also said no-one had any guns when it is a cut and dried fact that people turned up with guns. On the subject of what people may or may not have said I notice you're ignoring Putin's speech now
  12. jakee
  13. jakee
    Yeah, it is unloseable. Trump incited a violent occupation of the Capitol in a genuine attempt to overthrow the results of the election and the consequences of that do reflect badly on him. If he does pardon them it will be contrary to the interests of justice and democracy. If he doesn't pardon them it won't be because he's learned his lesson - he says he should have fought even harder to stay in power than he did - it'll be because he doesn't care about democracy or the little people. In this instance yes, Trump really does suck either way. I'm surprised you think that would make any difference. Trump has stated that nothing at all was done wrong by any of his supporters on Jan 6th, so how could any of them have airtight convictions?
  14. jakee
    You of course realise that excluding known homosexuals does nothing whatsoever to rid you of the ones who are lying. It just makes the unknown ones you still employ more susceptible to blackmail.
  15. jakee
    Pretty much, yeah. Do you think that legal battle was for show, or is it just another thing you'll claim the media invented?
  16. jakee
    I'd speculate it's because they were treating homelessness by trying to deal with the homeless people in front of them rather than doing something about the reasons more people were becoming homeless. So the strategy you hope for of doing more to deal with the homeless people in front of you... yeah. I'm sure that'll do great.
  17. jakee
    I donlt know what that is. Is it the founding conspiracy theory of the new right, by any chance? Those oligarchs are not in government, so it's irrelevant.
  18. jakee
    You think he had a blood pact with Trump to get into government before he bought Twitter? Dude - he didn't want to buy fucking Twitter. You're here thinking he's playing 4D chess 20 moves ahead of everyone else when the reality is he made a crazy back of a cocktail napkin offer without doing his due diligence then tried everything he possibly could to back out of the deal until there were no more courts to lose in and he had no legal options left but to pay up. You seem to be living in a fantasy world of bullshit revisionist history.
  19. jakee
    Give them a shot at what? Again, what is it you think Musk wants to do, apart from funnel more contracts and subsidies towards Musk?
  20. jakee
    He's been pretty clear that he wants to enjoy watching the leopards eat our faces. Let's see how long it takes for one of them to eat his.
  21. jakee
    Writing the words 'a study' is not the same thing as posting a study. Also not not a study of the thing we were talking about. Effective at what? Tackling homelessness? No, they're not. They don't do anything about it. At obtaining government contracts, government subsidies and making Musk richer? Yes, they're extremely good at that.
  22. jakee
    Ok, let me try and catch up: he's so thin skinned that a few articles by the liberal media have him throw all his toys out of the pram despite having profited massively from liberal green subsidies, but he is also so calculating and results focussed that he'll throw in with people who hate and constantly try and talk down his companies on the off chance that he could get a government position? Or, it's the trans thing and the awful dad thing just like he said it was.
  23. jakee
    Again, Tesla has been slated by Republicans and Republican media since forever, as Trump has slated EVs continually through this campaign.
  24. jakee
    So you have defintiely never done anything to find out, and when you said this seems to be happening, you meant you are simply imagining that it is happening. On that note, what do you think the result of Musk in governemnt going to be aside from funneling massively more money towards Musk companies? You've dropped the military thing as well. Again - you seriously think Trump should be thinking of deploying the military on American soil against American citizens... and that's a good thing?
  25. jakee
    First, $3.7Bn isn't all of $17.5Bn, is it? Second, I have no idea who owns them, but I know that even in California a lot of rich people are Republicans. I'm also quite sure you've done nothing to whatsoever to find out.