timmyfitz

Proves R's are regressives, in 1920 that would be a big slap in the face. Yep, that proves it. Your post is so reedikulus. (I didn't mean to misspell that word, it's just that all those keys are so close together)

Since thinking is accomplished in the mind which is one-third of the soul, emotions and will being the other two-thirds, I can assume that the condition of one's soul accurately determines the seriousness of one's thinking. So I suppose I'm seriously going to Hell. Whatever. Not that there's anything wrong with that . . . He is an Attorney. Was there any question about that? Well, Tim, at least some of us try. What?

I read that far. Absolutely. A misspelled word is a very logical reason to ignore the content of a post.

None is not a brand. If you don't use an AAD, then you don't participate in the poll. Pretty simple.

Since thinking is accomplished in the mind which is one-third of the soul, emotions and will being the other two-thirds, I can assume that the condition of one's soul accurately determines the seriousness of one's thinking. So I suppose I'm seriously going to Hell. Whatever. Not that there's anything wrong with that . . . He is an Attorney. Was there any question about that?

Seems like GOP senators, governors and congressmen have a pretty good handle on it too. Well, two wrongs do make a right. Thank you for pointing that out. Ummm NO, two wrongs make a wrong. However, many GOP supporters who post here seem to think that what their heroes say cancels out what they do. Back at you. Same holds true for the Dems.

Nice redirect. I bet there will be more to the sentence than just wearing a bracelet. Possibly no access to computers? Dumbest statement so far......

Seems like GOP senators, governors and congressmen have a pretty good handle on it too. Well, two wrongs do make a right. Thank you for pointing that out.

Where's the outrage from the left? If Obama does something Bush has done or wanted to do, it's OK. Anything Bush has done is unacceptable. Haven't you read the Democrat handbook?

Yep. Typical.

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/national_world&id=5072659 and only partially true when it was written. Well, since he is only partially guilty, then it's OK.

Tim, Tim Tim.... Another incomplete piece of advice. We have a lot of jumpers who think that PULLING the cutaway handle (which they think 'cutaway' means) will open their reserve. EVEN WITH A TOTAL MALFUNCTION! With a lot of people trained to always pull their cutaway handle, even for a total, saying that a "cutaway" will open your reserve is dangerous. I've had to educate several people over the years. Correct about having a total and just pulling the cutaway not doing anything. I was working under the assumption that the main was out. Very bad on my part for making that assumption. Also, I purposely used the word "should" instead of "will" to convey that it is not an absolute that an RSL will open anything, whether it's a total or a partial.

We don't call it "slinging meat" anymore. The correct term is "Protein delivery specialist" Get with the times grandpa! Are you sure you are not talking about a male porn star?

The house looks pretty average to me. I'm sure it doesn't require any more electricity or water to maintain it compared to other average homes. I don't know what everyone is getting upset about. http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/05/exclusive-estimate-carbon-footprint-of.html http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/05/03/stunning-pictures-al-gores-new-9-million-mansion-media-totally-ignore

Incorrect. If the rig has an RSL it should open the reserve automatically after a cutaway, whether it is student gear or not.

he's done extremely well for himself. A fine example of capitalism at work. It always amazes me thats staunch supporters of big business have such a hard time with Al Gore getting rich. You missed the point which was stated above. Practice what you preach. This applies to everyone. Doing otherwise makes them hypocrites.

You are such a bandit, following the rules and all that stuff. You rule following bandit. (If it's legal, it's not a bandit jump)

Just have to ask...... Why does student gear make you "end up looking down to much at the ground"?

Exchange rate has no bearing here. If this is the going rate in Ireland then it's fair.

The old AFF program had 7 levels. Following the ISP, you will have 8 levels for AFF. Although this is true for the most part, the currency recommendations are not part of the BSR's. Each dropzone may have different currency requirements.

Myth.

So this is "it doesn't cost the U.S. much as far as the overall budget is concerned so we should just ignore the problem and not enforce the laws". Gottcha. You assume those numbers are correct. Incorrect. I made no assumption about the numbers. My comment was only direct at this statement. Of course you did, or you woudn't have needed your qualifier. Pathetic. Nothing new. Lame weaseling. If his (disputed) numbers had been 100x higher, or showed a profit for the US, you wouldn't have written the same thing at all. Yes I would have written the same thing. The cost should not be a factor in the decision as to whether a law is enforced or not. I'm sorry your over inflated ego can't see that. Nonsense. If the cost had been $1 TRILLION per year instead of $3.5B, you certainly wouldn't have written "So this is 'it doesn't cost the U.S. much as far as the overall budget is concerned so we should just ignore the problem and not enforce the laws'" unless you were totally clueless about the size of the budget (of course, you may well be totally clueless). Likewise if illegals contributed $500B to the economy. So your statement only makes sense if you assume that the numbers are accurate. Wrong again but nice try. Your overinflated ego is getting in the way.

So this is "it doesn't cost the U.S. much as far as the overall budget is concerned so we should just ignore the problem and not enforce the laws". Gottcha. You assume those numbers are correct. Incorrect. I made no assumption about the numbers. My comment was only direct at this statement. Of course you did, or you woudn't have needed your qualifier. Pathetic. Nothing new. Lame weaseling. If his (disputed) numbers had been 100x higher, or showed a profit for the US, you wouldn't have written the same thing at all. Yes I would have written the same thing. The cost should not be a factor in the decision as to whether a law is enforced or not. I'm sorry your over inflated ego can't see that.

tell them to play in their country, if their country doesn't have a baseball field they can petition their government to build one. Why should my hard work to pay taxes go to those that did not even have the right to the results of my hard work. So you're against baseball. Are you against Mom and apple pie, too? Are you a Communist? Lame.

You know how many peoples minds you just blew with that? I'd venture 1 in 5 TI's has never read that section of the FAR's. Possibly 1 in 10 DZO's don't know of the Tandem Student requirements contained within..... It's a sad thing. 87.2% of all statistic are made up on the spot.