headoverheels

Maybe, but I'd bet no. What has he to lose? He'll probably win the election anyway.

I got your corn-oil-hole subsidy right here.

Interestingly enough, Ashley Todd used to be a Ron Paul supporter. In that instance, she sent an e-mail to the Ron Paul group saying her tires were slashed and that campaign paraphernalia had been stolen from her car because she supported Mr. Paul. I guess Huckabee policies caused that. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08299/922849-53.stm

I don't usually get the willies from Halloween stuff, but this gave me the creeps.

Ya want humor, here ya go. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2JUNptj7CE&feature=related

Ummm....no. Each has its place.

Forehead, not cheek.

Making marriage more difficult might also help preserve and protect it.

You can say that, but I've seen you on a lot of threads with, how can I say this, people expressing unsavory views, to say the least.

At least he has that great massage chair, in which to relax and drift off into obscurity.

No, you are the one who doesn't understand the numbers. From that U of M study, http://www.pnas.org/content/103/30/11206/F1.large.jpg

So, my numbers were the same as yours: Put in 4 gallons of energy, get out 1.25*4=5 gallons of energy, for a net gain of 1 gallon. Burn that 1 gallon and the 4 required to make it. So, burn 5 gallons to get energy of one gallon.

So what is the current efficiency?

Another LIB who dodges the issue and goes after the messenger. Obama said it not me. Said what? I cannot unambiguously tell, since that interview has been so edited, and other events spliced in. Of course, that is really the purpose.

I would favor a popular vote, but I don't live in a one-representative state like MT. I would have preferred Gore to Bush, but wasn't exactly impressed with Gore. I think that the choices this time, on both sides (ignoring VP), are better than in 2000.

Hmmm, I don't think any of those are true. What I don't like about Obama is his support for subsidy of corn-based ethanol (for fuel -- I'm all in favor of corn-based ethanol for drinking). It just makes no sense, from an energy-in, energy-out perspective. It is not greenhouse gas friendly, as it requires burning 5 gallons (optimistically), just to get 1 gallon for the fuel tank.

“Young Chuck moved to Texas and bought a donkey from a farmer for $100. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day. The next day the farmer drove up and said, ‘Sorry son, but I have some bad news - the donkey died.’ Chuck replied, ‘Well, then just give me my money back.’ The farmer said, ‘Can't do that. I went and spent it already.’ Chuck said, ‘Ok, then, just bring me the dead donkey.’ The farmer asked, ‘What ya gonna do with him?’ Chuck said, ‘I'm going to raffle him off.’ The farmer said, ‘You can't raffle off a dead donkey!’ Chuck said, ‘Sure I can, watch me. I just won't tell anybody he's dead.’ A month later, the farmer met up with Chuck and asked, ‘What happened with that dead donkey?’ Chuck said, ‘I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars a piece and made $998.’ The farmer said, ‘Didn't anyone complain?’ Chuck said, ‘Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back.’ Chuck now leads the US bank bailout team."

Yup. I heard that she has formed a secret pact with Sen Obama - whichever party wins the Whitehouse gets to blow it up, and the other one gets to watch. Nah, the Dems just found out how corrupt she is, and paid her off to throw the election. She, on the other hand, is laughing all the way to the bank, since she knows they didn't have a chance anyway, once she was picked.

Do you think that a bobcat is equal to a grandma? No. No bobcat could take my grandma.

Infiniti QX4.

Here's mine.

Damn, Hargrave is wrong on almost every issue. It's hard to do that. No, what you want is for the President and Congress to be able to actually accomplish something in which you are interested. Every one of the party you most favor will do the most for that goal.

Something I found on Ashley Todd's group's web site (obviously a comment, not something they posted): Dear Red States... Submitted by Anonymous on October 24, 2008 - 7:07pm. We've decided we're leaving. We intend to form our own country, and we're taking the other Blue States with us. In case you aren't aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and all the Northeast. We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation, and especially to the people of the new country of New California. To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states. We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get Elliot Spitzer. You get Ken Lay. We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood. We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Ole' Miss. We get 85 percent of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get Alabama. We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the red states pay their fair share. Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the Christian Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of single moms. Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and anti-war, and we're going to want all our citizens back from Iraq at once. If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals. They have kids they're apparently willing to send to their deaths for no purpose, and they don't care if you don't show pictures of their children's caskets coming home. We do wish you success in Iraq, and hope that the WMDs turn up, but we're not willing to spend our resources in Bush's Quagmire. With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80 percent of the country's fresh water, more than 90 percent of the pineapple and lettuce, 92 percent of the nation's fresh fruit, 95 percent of America's quality wines (you can serve French wines at state dinners) 90 percent of all cheese, 90 percent of the high tech industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT. With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with 88 percent of all obese Americans (and their projected health care costs), 92 percent of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100 percent of the tornadoes, 90 percent of the hurricanes, 99 percent of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100 percent of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia. We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you. Additionally, 38 percent of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually swallowed by a whale, 62 percent believe life is sacred unless we're discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44 percent say that evolution is only a theory, 53 percent that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61 percent of you crazy b*****ds believe you are people with higher morals then we lefties. By the way, we're taking the good pot, too. You can have that dirt weed they grow in Mexico.

You could all do what my Mom's friends did when she turned 40, and get him Sympathy cards instead of birthday cards.

The next 4 years will be pretty bad, no matter who wins.