mr2mk1g

CD originals are copied and never see the light of day - the copies I treat like absolute crap and are considered disposable items. DVD originals go from the box to the machine and back again.

Aspirin right? So don't take aspirin - switch to one of the more modern drugs which don't have such bad side effects such as ibuprofen or ones based on acetaminophen which is not supposed to have much effect on the stomach at all.

- how about several (like 3 at angles to one another) so you can see yourself from behind too? (not that I like looking at my own arse or anything - just I figure it would be a good training tool to be able to look at a couple of different aspects of your body position at one go).

http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/images/7172.gif

Ah, thanks for that. I'd asked you to explain that in a thread a few months back. Now I see what you were talking about. cheers.

um... you do realize right that amongst the lengthy conditions of joining the EU are adoption of its principles not the EU's adoption of your principles right?

I see you point - but of course if it comes out it turns into exactly the same kind of snag hazard as an ordinary hackey (except admittedly with corners and a more drag). I have to admit though, I cannot see the tuck tab coming out of its housing without user error or the use of a canopy smaller than the rig was designed for. That thing is so tightly stuck under the flap I have to use two separate movements in order to deploy the pc – 1: pull pud (an inward movement), 2: throw. (at least on mine anyway... of course rigs will differ). I saw one guy tucking the tab into the spandex... I wonder how many people complaining are doing this instead of putting the tab under the side flap where it's supposed to go? As for the more distance between the tab and the pc – this allows the tab to be under the side flap instead of the mouth of the boc. This way it is facing back towards the mouth of the boc. The pud therefore covers the mouth of the pouch like a trap door – a design I feel is far more secure than other designs which simply let the pub hang out the spandex held only by the elastic of the pouch. If you compare it to a hackey for example, there is something there to snag - the connection point between the hackey and pc. With this method the pud completely covers the mouth of the boc, the pc, and anything that's exposed as well as the connecting tape.

I wonder if they're trying to rely on documents that have already been proven to be forgeries like they did last time?

oh jeez - you'll be after our WMD next and wanting to invade.

Cheney's gay?

It's been a hell of a long time now since Barristers were paid by the word (the source of the whole problem)... you'da thought you guys would have got the message by now - even out in the colonies.

That's a good sign. I'm glad the Iraqi court came through earlier in the month too and over-ruled their parliament on the changes they wanted to make to ensure it was harder for this to be rejected The change would have devalued the result - as it is we have a result their new law makers can stand behind. It was a close thing mind - look at the result for Nineveh.

hehe, that's a good one. I'm not familiar with US drafting doctrine, but it does strike me as odd that he doesn't actually get to his point till the 12th paragraph on p4... everything before that is just dross as far as his argument is concerned.

1: do-dah 2: thingamy bob

What's wrong with it?

often you're right. However I also like to think that sometimes Speakers Corner = people educated enough to know and care about what's going on around them and wish to discuss those issues with other like minded individuals - irrespective of which side of the controversy they sit. Just like I put my Trafalgar commemoration thread here last week - it belonged somewhere where people weren't going to turn it into a thread about boobies.

Could someone describe in detail this new handle design because the one on mine I would describe as one of the greatest features of the rig. The short descriptions here don't appear to tally with the design I have. cheers

Doesn't that statement you quote completely contradict itself?

I was gonna post this in the ladies forum but don't like to intrude... certainly the best place for it I think. http://www.ebaumsworld.com/wakthesak.html

Must have changed things since I got mine... Try contacting Wings and see what they say.

'Course. Oral is not "sex". The term "sex" is shorthand for "sexual intercourse". This is defined as the penetration of the vagina by the penis. This is not what you do during oral sex, ergo it is not "sex". I do not consider it to be akin to kissing though, it is far more intimate. Thus I disagree with both your poll options. I choose "none of the above".

The article also says: And later points out that essentially the thickening is caused by the warmer weather causing more precipitation which falls as snow on the glacier resulting in a thickening. And it does indeed state that the ice is melting at its edges and in fact states quite clearly that that is due to global warming. Whether or not the whole of the scientific community agrees with that statement, it is made by the article you post.

You can set the playback to automatically display the picture in the correct orientation. Don't see the point personally although I guess it's useful if you're outputting to a TV. The only rattle on my 300D is the mechanism for springing open the flash. If I open the flash and touch the leavers to stop them moving around I hear no rattle.

I vote "no" to both of your poll options.