FLYJACK
-
Content
5,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
32 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by FLYJACK
-
So, you are claiming people who view this thread or post here are not intelligent..
-
Crazy right.. This is the only unsolved skyjacking for ransom and arguably one of the top 10 historic US mysteries.. and this thread has only 1,514,904 views... The LEMMiNO DB Cooper video on youtube has 13 million views..
-
Unfortunately, we will be stuck with weak suspects like this... at least until I release my info..
-
I have both undisclosed suspect info and specific Cooper case evidence.. but it is not my job to challenge marginal suspects. These guys will push their suspect no matter what.. I know exactly how it will go..
-
Ridicule isn't actually an argument.. The more you use ridicule the weaker your position..
-
Serious note,, I have information that I can't share publicly, I have been instructed, sounds like a dodge but it is hard to argue something when you can't reveal it.. The guy resembles the sketch and worked with Titanium but there is no evidence Cooper lived in the PNW. I am just fed up with weak suspects sucking all the energy out of the case.. First Ulis's suspect,, now this guy... Find a guy that resembles one of the Cooper sketches and might have been exposed to Titanium and you can have your own Cooper suspect.. It is getting beyond ridiculous..
-
Of course you do, you have no clue what information I have.. but you keep going with your suspect.. I actually prefer you waste your time...
-
I am not the one publicly pushing a terrible suspect at a conference. I don't even talk about Hahneman.. you keep bringing him up, not me. Your suspect is weak. These terrible suspects just diminish the credibility of the case.. turning Cooper into a farce.
-
I'll give you guys one thing, he looks closer than Ulis's suspect.. but he is not Cooper,, wonder how I knew about him 3 weeks ago?? We don't need any of more these weak suspects..
-
Not in all those images..
-
It is. What evidence is there for him being Cooper.. He vaguely resembles the sketch like 100,000 guys and he worked with Titanium.. you better have a helluva lot more than that.
-
Old news... his hair is parted on the wrong side.
-
No, just somebody there posted today's itinerary on twitter..
-
CooperCon today... https://twitter.com/thejasonrush/status/1594026335646588928
-
I sent a similar era same material, Dacron Polyester Pennys clip on tie to Tom for control testing... but his machine has been broken..
-
Teletype was edited to exclude non Flight 305 traffic.
-
Looking into Rem Cru is not a problem.. I have gone down so many crazy rabbit holes that didn't pan out I can't even remember.. But this suspect is not Cooper.. he doesn't match Cooper's description or profile, he doesn't have the protruding lower lip, there is really nothing there other than he worked with some exotic metals that might match a few particles on the tie. I also have some evidence not released publicly that he does not match... The media is a sucker for a good narrative and Ulis is a great salesman.. Look at all the press he got for Sheridan for years and a History Channel program all bogus.. all nonsense..
-
Yes, the tie was certainly left by Cooper but was he the person wearing it when those particles were deposited? Who knows.. The tie was sold between about spring 64 and spring 65,, it had significant dust in the knot when it was found on the plane suggesting it was stored/sitting for some time.. so, there were years to accumulate particles which may have come from the production/dye/fire retardants, from different environmental exposures, possibly even from the plane or post hijacking..
-
No, it doesn't mean anything, those elements were used in many environments. Did you know that Yttrium was used in the manufacturing process of polyester..
-
I am not a patent expert but I don't think you can patent a ratio range.. you patent the process/use. Also, the other trace elements found were not in the patent ratio.. IMO, those particles have nothing to do with the patent and may have nothing to do with Rem Cru. The particle TiSb ratio is within the range in the patent but it is not complete and not exclusive. It is like finding fried chicken on a tie and claiming it was worn by Colonel Sanders. Eric will push this and his suspect regardless and it will go nowhere and fizzle out..
-
Kaye did say it, it was months ago and I can't remember the source.. I would have to go search for it.. try searching the other Cooper forum, if it isn't there than it was in an email.. The ratio outlined in the patent is a range, that ratio is not exclusive to the patent. To be clear, a ratio range is outlined in the patent but that does not mean it is exclusive to the patent. I did find another patent that had the same TiSb ratio.. Sprague Electric. Eric claimed he looked for other sources and couldn't find any so it was exclusive to Rem Cru.. This is just not logical. Eric has no basis to claim it was exclusive to Rem Cru but he flips it to make others prove it isn't.. This is what he has done for years, he makes unsubstantiated claims then demands you prove it false, that isn't how it works.. It is very very hard to prove a negative.. There is no evidence those particles were exclusive to Rem Cru.. none.
-
Dr Edwards has lost it... https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/23121809-d-b-cooper-and-flight-305-northern-oregon He is now claiming Rataczak has changed his view and contradicts the FBI narrative.. BS What Edwards has done is classic confirmation bias.. First, he misquotes Rataczak, he was citing Himmelsbach. Edwards left that part out of the quote. He was making a general statement. Further, he ignores all the evidence over the years from Rataczak and Soderlind which confirm the FBI jump zone.. The call to Soderlind was in the suburbs of Portland AND Soderlind was listening to the transmissions and took notes. Edwards has grabbed one general statement out of context to claim his theory which is not supported by any evidence and is actually contradicted by the evidence. The Vortex has taken another victim... Dr Edwards...
-
I can't remember, it might have been mentioned on the other Cooper forum or in a personal email.. But, Rem Cru is worth pursuing regardless.. I have pursued many leads that haven't panned out based on speculation.. The issue is Eric making claims of fact that are unproven or false.. he has always done this to manufacture a conclusion. Those particles are not confirmed to be an alloy.. If they are an alloy the ratio is not exclusive to Rem Cru. and, he still has the date for the tie wrong..
-
Tom suggested it could be coated..
-
and I just got a response to an FBI FOIA.. It says there is info and it will be released in the Cooper Vault... but, I don't know what that is,, either Gunther or parachute info.. it doesn't say
