FLYJACK

They saw 305 on radar..

A pair of F106's and a pair of F102's..

Prove it..

He wasn't their spokesman.

The 50 years of failure line is irrelevant.. and IMO false.. The tapes are not evidence of anything... What evidence do you have other than the tapes that Reca/Peca even knew of Cossey in 1971 or knew him personally?

Hold on.. back up, Reca/Peca's tapes are full of bad case information, It is clear that Carl Laurin researched the case, coached and led Reca/Peca with his poor research. Carl and Reca/Peca got so much wrong that the entire narrative is ridiculous... everything said in those tapes is completely unreliable. To show that Reca/Peca knew Cossey it has to be corroborated beyond those tapes.. but a complete waste of time since Reca/Peca is not Cooper and the worst higher profile suspect ever presented.

Gregory,, one quarter Indian or Mexican blood.

64 jumps in 1958? Do they count military jumps?

Unfortunately the checks are on negative side of the ledger,,, Did you mark down the ability to drift 100 miles under canopy in a strong wind...

He meant either,, not one specifically.

Gregory said 1/4 Mexican or possibly Native American blood.. that is virtually the same as Latin (Latino)

Not exactly, it was also the hair and the complexion.. overall appearance.

False dichotomy, NickyB.. Bill said "he does kind of look like him.." the sketch. He is correct. He is one of the few that didn't notice a dark olive complexion.. an outlier,, why is that? Did he only see a profile? Did he not really pay close attention to Cooper because he didn't know a hijacking was going on and he moved seats.. odd, don't you think.. Bill didn't see the dark complexion but now you rely on him.. to ID a guy you claim had a dark Norwegian complexion. He also said he couldn't ID Cooper any longer... You seem to miss that part Nicky.. selective memory. Bill was being polite, he is a nice guy and Vordahl does kind of resemble sketch, Gregory knew something was up with Cooper when he got up to leave he took a good look at him.. and Gregory's description was corroborated by others. and Bill was the one who mentioned the turkey neck, that is something you would see in the profile..

Sure, you have many boxes to check.. resembling the sketch is the basics.. it is a process and with such a passage of time you just can't get all the info needed for each suspect.. Where was X on November 24 1971.. I have put together a 100 point list for Cooper's profile.. some are facts, witness testimony but most are inferences made by the FBI.. it surprised me how few 100% facts we actually have.. that gives suspects lots of plausible wiggle room,, he had a tan or he was a dark Norwegian.. This 100 point list really sorts out the weak... each point can be a match, a negation or an unknown.. a match or a negation can be qualified from weak to strong.. but at the end you still a get a circumstantial analysis or a map. Very strong to very weak. When Cooper is revealed everything will fit in place and it will be obvious, not a bending, twisting or contorting of evidence to make him fit. I think new DNA will be the only way to put somebody in the end zone, and that may not even be possible any longer with the FBI and contamination.. we may only have a strong circumstantial case at best...

Titanium-Antimony and salt was used as a flameproofing for textiles starting in the 50's... That is why I sent a 1964 era Penny's tie to Tom for testing.. some of the particle may be inherent to the production/dying/flame proofing of Dacron Polyester.

The other problem is using sketches and pics.. a single image can be misleading more images with ancestral facts to corroborate are better.. I have a dozen images of a suspect and he looks like 3 completely different people..

Apparently Russian.. but we can't trust any info about Reca, the narrative is a fraud..

Is it his blue eyes and ability to drift a chute 100 miles (Vern Jones) that makes him native..

My view is that when we see Cooper for real, we will clearly see what the witnesses saw.. not a guy with a tan, not a Norwegian or an Italian... We will see a guy that resembles the sketch AND has obvious Latin/Mexican/Native Am features and characteristics. He is probably mixed race or just has that look. The sketch B is the best composite they could come up with, anybody close should pass the sketch test. The flaw is that it is limiting being front only and just a sketch that many people resemble... Cooper was nondescript and unmemorable.. Many of the suspects that resemble the sketch have some unique characteristic that Cooper did not have. The next test is the witness testimony.. Pass that and we move to other evidence. Vordahl resembles the sketch but he does not exhibit the characteristics in the witness testimony, does that eliminate him, no, but it is knock against. The profile image (if accurate) does eliminate him, IMO..

I doubt you will actually put me on ignore, your ego won't do it. I appreciate good humour or the odd jab when it is based in truth.. You repeatedly default to a personal attack,, you haven't done this with anyone else. It isn't about contradicting or disagreements, you are disrespectful and immature, probably because you perceive my criticisms as a threat.

Why do you find it necessary to lie.. Is this what passes for normal behaviour now? The guy has personally attacked me with malice 4 or 5 times already..

12 letters matches Labissionere.. He also mentioned no moustache in his testimony, that matches this doc..

Black and white photos are poor for showing complexion, but those home films from the 50's/60's are terrible.. My aunt had one of those cameras and filmed everything. I recently converted some to DVD.. I even had the working projector, watching with the projector all the tones were dark, everybody had a darker complexion, it was not accurate at all. These things were very light sensitive. When I got the film converted to digital on DVD the tones were even darker.. These films were just not tonally accurate.

Remember, ridicule isn't actually an argument.. it is a sign of weakness. I do enjoy jokes when they based in truth, when they are not it is a personal attack.. If you keep up this BS personal crap you will be reported every time from now on, that is about 4x now. I will send them all to the mods. I won't put up with this childish crap. The mods here are not as generous as other forums. If you want to act immature there are lots of other places for children.

I go by the witnesses and what I see in that Vordahl image.. You guys are all over the map trying to discredit the evidence to make Vordahl fit.. Do you honestly see Latin(o)/Mexican/Native American in that Vordahl image.. No, you don't so you then attack the witnesses.. or me. Now,, if you want to claim the witnesses were mistaken or just the ones that don't fit your narrative then anybody can be Cooper, right. Cooper was described by witnesses as Latin/Mexican/Native Am.. TRUE Norwegian Vordahl does not present with those characteristics. TRUE Conclusion.... Vordahl is not Cooper.. Checkmate boys.