FLYJACK
-
Content
5,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
32 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by FLYJACK
-
No, they vacuumed the tie and when the vacuum filter was tested his DNA was found..
-
2002 report,,, "more than one individual"
-
DNA mixtures do present problems.. https://www.nist.gov/feature-stories/dna-mixtures-forensic-science-explainer
-
You keep making claims and REFUSE to provide any evidence.. you look like a hypocrite demanding evidence from others and having none.. You'd think it would be easy if it was true... When did Reca/Peca leave his family and move to Wa.. just show evidence of the dates.. This should be really easy....
-
Weber hasn't been here for about 7 years.. you do realize that SKYJACK is 10 years old, right. Jo was a serial liar.. but most liked her. Now, you have no excuse left to avoid answering a simple question.. only a deep state operative would refuse.. Since we now know there is no evidence Reca/Peca colluded with Cossey, it is all made up.. When did Reca/Peca leave his family in Mi and move to Wa then return..
-
I am not American and my location is inside a Volcano.. that is all I can say.
-
You mean SKYJACK.. Can you prove you are not a deep state actor trying to undermine the case..
-
Speaking of being led around by the nose... When did Reca/Peca leave Mi and his family after the 1965 robbery and go to Wa,, and when did he return? What dates are confirmed for Reca/Peca in Wa... This should be a simple answer.. it seems it isn't, maybe because it was made up.
-
Yes, a match can connect somebody to the tie but no match does not eliminate somebody from being Cooper. Think of it like unidentified fingerprints found near Cooper's seat... If you find a match that connects somebody, but if you don't match that doesn't eliminate. The tie DNA is not confirmed to be Cooper's.. The FBI was fishing for a match..
-
https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/cms_041239.pdf
-
They were not certain the DNA was Cooper's... (likely belongs) that means not matching does not really eliminate.
-
Did you read the last doc.. This says they (Q1) were destroyed after testing Dec '71. This is the closest...
-
Specimen Q1 is the cigarette butts,, they were destroyed after testing a few weeks after the hijacking.. (Cigarette butts) "may be destroyed at the Bureau on completion of examination" "Specimen Q1contains 8 cigarette butts" "disposition of Q1".. "by a separate report"
-
Desperate..
-
First reaction,, Reca/Peca is too big,, has a huge head and hands,, but who are these people, when and where was the picture taken? I don't see Cossey there.. When was Reca/Peca in Wa,, which years?
-
New FBI doc #77 https://vault.fbi.gov/D-B-Cooper /d.-b.-cooper-part-77/view
-
Langseth DNA is excluded... Blue eyes.. Not Cooper,, red herring.
-
Egg Harbour suspect identified.. Fred Angelo Catalano
-
Shelton suspect named.. Jason T. Langseth FBI did DNA test. Also got Duane Weber's items for DNA test..
-
When I uncovered the back chute card SN 60-9707 in the files, it was found on the plane and not belonging to the back chute left behind and returned to Hayden, there was speculation it was the SN for a pilot chute and got mixed up. That back chute card must have belonged to the chute Cooper used. Here, Cossey said there was no SN on the pilot chutes..
-
That is it.. can't be. That isn't evidence.. It is a 50 year old claim that he gave directions to somebody claimed to be a friend of Cossey.. So, there is no evidence Peca/Reca even knew Cossey let alone colluded with Cossey.. of course we know it is false because Cossey didn't supply the back chutes, Hayden did, Cossey just happened to have packed them 6 months earlier. But, what about the dates Reca/Peca was in Wa.. he left Mi and his family after the robbery,, when was that and when did he return to MI,, is there any proof or is it just another baseless claim.
-
Look a squirrel... Answer the questions,, what is the evidence to back up your claims.. Your claims are based on unfounded claims of others..
-
You must not have confidence in your claim. It should be easy to answer.. you spent more time dodging the question that it would take to answer. You keep making claims over and over but can never back them up.. Is that how a "mentalist" lies to people?
-
Hiding behind hyperbole .. You have made some claims and can't back them up, the questions are not difficult or a trick. When exactly was Reca/Peca in Seattle after fleeing his family in Mi (sometime after 1965), when did he return? What evidence do you have that Reca/Peca knew of Cossey, knew Cossey personally and colluded with Cossey about the chutes.. You have made these claims, where is the evidence? Why are you avoiding these simple questions?
-
I knew it wouldn't last.
