FLYJACK

I did name them. and you know I have the receipts...

Ulis cracks, shifts talking points, walks back suspect by now claiming anybody at Rem Cru could have acquired Titanium Antimony particles even the secretary... maybe he realized Petersen's hair was parted on the wrong side.

Acting on behalf of a family member is understandable.. front running a search isn't..

I never said it was a PAC or CIA,, I said her "camp" They were protecting her and front ran a massive search operation, FACT

It is possible and worth considering.. proving something like that is nearly impossible. Another scenario is that Cooper put some money in a stews unattended purse.. they wouldn't have noticed it until much later.

Sure, it was Tina's sister and FBI agent brother in law..

I don't believe Tina knew Cooper prior to the hijacking.. and she wasn't in on it. Tina's camp didn't do a search they released a narrative to pre-empt a large scale ground search. IMO, it was a CYA move in case they found Cooper and/or the money. It is getting really hard to keep straight who said what about each of the sketches.. redactions don't help. Lyle was an FBI informant prior to NORJAK, I posted proof. It was related to his foreign contacts, mostly Russians. This is odd because that is the CIA's turf... I never found any proof he was connected to CIA but that may have come later and the CIA was all over Central America.. Ex military guys travelling the world working humanitarian missions screams CIA.. (Kivett)

This is a crazy rabbit hole.. Plane crash story.. https://web.archive.org/web/20160323230449/http://cajunvic.com/site/Planecrash.html plane owner, W.H.Kivett, HR-AFQ Personal Information WILLIAM HERBERT KIVETT Airman opted-out of releasing address Medical Information: No Medical Information Available Certificates PRIVATE PILOT Certificates Description Certificate: PRIVATE PILOT Date of Issue: 8/18/1964 Ratings: PRIVATE PILOT AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND William Herbert Kivett, Billy returned home to Honduras and a career as a governmental advisor, environmentalist and entrepreneur. He advised mayors on proper planning and brought electricity and water to remote areas of his country. Billy was instrumental in preserving Honduras’ largest lake, Yojoa, and starting a foundation to save trees. He opened three green houses and hired only single parents with the agreement they would put their kids in school. As a businessman, he ran an airline, sold opals and raised pigs, starting with five and increasing to 1,000 before selling out. Billy also founded the Rotary Club in Tegucigalpa. He died from cancer in Honduras in 2004 at the age of 62. Billy had a master ofregional and city planning from OU (1965). Interesting Lesser-known fact: When flying supplies to troops during the 1969 war with El Salvador, he encountered bad visibility and was asked his location. His reply: “If we see bullet holes in the wings, we are definitely over enemy territory.”

If that is true then why was she the primary for sketch A and the go to for vetting suspect images.. It can't be both ways... either she saw his face well enough for a sketch and vetting suspect images or she didn't.. as she claimed twice. IMO, She is hiding info about Cooper from the FBI. Flo,,,

Respectfully, that just does not make sense. She was shown suspect images for years.. AFTER she claimed she didn't see Cooper's face.

In the Unsolved Mysteries episode Florence said..

Did Tina see Cooper's face... If yes, why did she later claims twice that she didn't. If no, then why did she produce sketch A and was the FBI go to for vetting suspect images. She is hiding something and that may be information that identifies Cooper. This is likely a CYA, not a conspiracy or plot..

and Tina's ex said the FBI was watching them...

This is different,, Tina detailed Cooper's face for "Sketch A" a few days later... then almost a year later when the sketch was to be redone she claimed she didn't see his face.. That is not the same situation you are describing.

The problem with the trauma explanation is that her only inconsistency involves Cooper's facial description,, all the rest is consistent and detailed. If it were due to trauma then we'd see more widespread inconstancies... In other words, isn't it odd that the trauma would be isolated to the description of Cooper's face.. Taken on its own it suggests evasiveness/deception... not what that deception is.

Well, we know her statements to the FBI were contradictory/inconsistent. and I have evidence that her camp tried to front run a large scale Cooper ground search. Why,, because she needed to publicly plant a narrative in case Cooper and the money was found.

The thing is, Tina is hiding something from the FBI..... She may know more about Cooper than she is telling the FBI.

More of a CYA... Even Flo suggested Tina was hiding something..

False choice. It does support a theory when you add in other information.. not a plot or conspiracy.

I get it, acute traumatic events can affect memory, but I think this is different. Look at the events in sequence.. Tina and Flo give a detailed description of Cooper to produce sketch A, Flo doesn't like the sketch so it is predominantly from Tina's input.. Sketch A is to be revised with the input of all witnesses, Tina rejects it.. and re-iterates support for sketch A. Tina states she did not see Cooper's face straight on.. and elsewhere says she didn't see him well because he was bent over... sounds odd. The FBI uses Tina as their primary witness viewing images to eliminate suspects. So, Tina wanted sketch A to represent Cooper against the views of other witnesses.. when it was to be revised she claimed she didn't she his face straight on and her description oddly became both vague and precise.. Does anybody believe Tina did not see Cooper's face... she is largely responsible for sketch A. We know sketch A was a bad sketch and using that sketch for about a year certainly had a negative impact on the case. Tina was specific early for sketch A then became vague, misleading and reluctant to support sketch B.. Either she was deceitful about sketch A or her later statement about not seeing Cooper's face.. This is NOT consistent... It is one or the other.. there is no middle. Tina is hiding something,,

Sure, but why.... IMO, she did see Cooper's face but after sketch A was produced she changed her testimony... Her testimony became more vague, that is is a classic sign of deception. She is hiding something..

Remember, Sketch A was mostly Tina, why if she didn't get a look at Cooper's face straight on, Flo didn't like the sketch... She remembered his face for Sketch A then afterward she claimed she didn't see it.. that is not consistent. Tina was the go to witness to eliminate suspects from pics, how can that be if she didn't see Cooper's face.. If this ever went to court her statements would have discredited her.... FBI agent Larry Carr on Tina...

Looks to be working now...

From a book... https://books.google.ca/books?id=BVmrIisC9xwC&pg=PT123&lpg=PT123&dq="lyle+cameron"+"honduras"&source=bl&ots=sIo5do5i05&sig=ACfU3U38az44tQIHZCl1B0LO3hW85F8xsg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAkrie-rb8AhUpMTQIHa3BD70Q6AF6BAgYEAM#v=onepage&q="lyle cameron" "honduras"&f=false

or she is hiding something...