FLYJACK

I know, but until recently I was the only one. I fought this for years.. Everybody believed that the rubber bands were on each packet and they arrived as three separate packets.. That is Ulis's premise for the narrative to claim the money had to be buried... and others claim it had to arrive in the money bag.. Once you realize that the money arrived as one bundle then the means by which it could have arrived opens up. I believe the money came from the River as one bundle of packets during a Spring when the water level was well above the money find spot.. the money sinks so it tumbled along the bottom to the spot.. The mystery is how, why and when did the money go into the River. I have a few theories for that but they are speculative and we will never have proof.

Larry was the one who screwed this up by conflating bundles and packets... I don't think Tom even knows about this.. actually I think I sent him info on it a while ago but he may not remember. The dominant long held belief was that the money arrived as three separate packets because it was found that way.. and that restricted how the money could have arrived.. For example,, how could three individual packets land in the river 5 miles upstream and end up together.. or go through a dredge.. But three separate packets doesn't fit the evidence... I caught this years ago and was rejected and even told to shut up about it.. Logically, it never made sense. If the money was randomized and the packets of 100 were not then they must have been in bundles. It is almost a certainty that the money arrived as one single rubber banded bundle of several packets but few people have come around to this. Not sure why, Himmelsbach confirmed it went to Cooper like that. People will still fight this... their loss.

The idea was that randomized bundles would look hastily prepared vs uniform bundles,,, I don't know the variation,, 3 packets to 6 packets per bundle? A hijacker would be given a degree of false confidence that the money wasn't marked/recorded and try to pass the money.. That was the thinking behind it..

When the money was found, the FBI stated that the money was found in the same condition and order as given to Cooper and they said that only the hijacker would know what that is... So, the packaging was hold back information. As for the 302's, remember we only have a small fraction of the documents.

See, you don't know everything.. There were reports that the Cooper ransom money was randomized to make it look hastily prepared and Carr talked to a guy at the bank who said he rebanded the bundles.. Carr screwed that up and thought he meant the packets of 100.. << that is a source of the confusion. So, the evidence is that the Cooper money was randomized, we know that the packets were not. Therefore, the randomization could only be the number of packets in a bundle and those are only held together with rubber bands. Simple, and it is confirmed by Himmelsbach's statement. We don't know what Cooper did with the money on the plane, he could have pulled packets from a bundle to stuff in his pockets or hand to stews..

I said we don't have explicit evidence probably because the FBI was holding that back.. This is simple logic,, if they randomized the bundles and the individual packets were not randomized then they were rubber banded into bundles. Why is this so hard..

I posted that before I saw your post but use of the term bundles has been conflated by most people in the Cooper case including Larry Carr,, people have confused a packet of 100 bills with a group of packets, a bundle.. That conflation is the source of most of the problems.. Carr screwed everything up when he claimed the bundles were randomized and he thought it was the individual packets.. IMO, that image is how the money went to Cooper and landed on TBAR.. The evidence is by inference, the "bundles" were made random,, we know that wasn't the packets of 100. So, it could only have been the group of packets which could only be secured by rubber bands.

We have gone over this ad nauseam.. The evidence does not explicitly describe the packaging of the money but using basic logic we can figure it out. The 302 evidence shows bank bands for the packets of 100. There were rubber band frags found on the money. (If it didn't go to Cooper like that somebody would have to have added them, not likely) The FBI stated that money was found in the same order and packaging as it was given to Cooper. The FBI stated the money was from one bundle. The FBI stated that the money was made into random sized bundles, the packets of 100's were not random sized (it makes no sense that each packet would be randomized by count) so the bundles made random had to be the groups of packets, those are only contained by rubber bands. There is no other possibility. This is confirmed by Himmelsbach statement in that video. Packet's were strapped with bank bands and those packets were rubber banded into random sized bundles. That is how the money went to Cooper. So, if the money arrived on TBAR as one rubber banded bundle of several packets that opens up the means of arrival.. The notion that the three packets arrived separately and be together means they were human buried is based on a false premise.

Pro tip... The rubber bands were holding the individual packets together in a single bundle. The money was given to Cooper in strapped (bank banded) 100's which were then rubber banded into random sized bundles.. Ergo,, the TBAR money most likely landed as one single bundle of several packets of 100 bills as it went to Cooper..

Catalano was first suggested as a suspect by Los Angeles in 1972 from Eugene, later he lived in Egg Harbor.. then another guy popped up around 1975 with a connection to Egg Harbor and was eliminated. Then Catalano was suggested for DNA testing in 2004.. The mix up wasn't the FBI,, it was the Cooper community We need to look back in the 302's for a suspect from Eugene suggested by Los Angeles before June 1972.. that was Catalano.

Yes,, Cooper had acquired aviation knowledge/experience somewhere, not necessarily as a pilot but most likely in the military..

Bingo,, look into military base IFR procedures in Vietnam.

Cooper told Tina: 'I have a grudge, but not with your airlines' Does this imply 'some other airline' ? Maybe people should shift from tie particles Ti alloys, to pilots with a grudge against some airline in 1971 ? Who else other than pilots knows about IFR clearance... there is your clue..

CIA training facilities...

Cossey got his Master Rigger certificate 5 weeks before packing Hayden's chutes..

Tina's camp released a distorted narrative right before the massive ground search in March '72,, nothing was found. Why, because they were worried about what might be found.. They needed to get in front of the search in case something was found that would affect Tina.. The timing and information is extremely suspicious.. and as far as I know they have never done this before or after.. and for the record, there are no White House documents marked "secret" in my home..

No, they did not conduct a search..

I did name them. and you know I have the receipts...

Ulis cracks, shifts talking points, walks back suspect by now claiming anybody at Rem Cru could have acquired Titanium Antimony particles even the secretary... maybe he realized Petersen's hair was parted on the wrong side.

Acting on behalf of a family member is understandable.. front running a search isn't..

I never said it was a PAC or CIA,, I said her "camp" They were protecting her and front ran a massive search operation, FACT

It is possible and worth considering.. proving something like that is nearly impossible. Another scenario is that Cooper put some money in a stews unattended purse.. they wouldn't have noticed it until much later.

Sure, it was Tina's sister and FBI agent brother in law..

I don't believe Tina knew Cooper prior to the hijacking.. and she wasn't in on it. Tina's camp didn't do a search they released a narrative to pre-empt a large scale ground search. IMO, it was a CYA move in case they found Cooper and/or the money. It is getting really hard to keep straight who said what about each of the sketches.. redactions don't help. Lyle was an FBI informant prior to NORJAK, I posted proof. It was related to his foreign contacts, mostly Russians. This is odd because that is the CIA's turf... I never found any proof he was connected to CIA but that may have come later and the CIA was all over Central America.. Ex military guys travelling the world working humanitarian missions screams CIA.. (Kivett)

This is a crazy rabbit hole.. Plane crash story.. https://web.archive.org/web/20160323230449/http://cajunvic.com/site/Planecrash.html plane owner, W.H.Kivett, HR-AFQ Personal Information WILLIAM HERBERT KIVETT Airman opted-out of releasing address Medical Information: No Medical Information Available Certificates PRIVATE PILOT Certificates Description Certificate: PRIVATE PILOT Date of Issue: 8/18/1964 Ratings: PRIVATE PILOT AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND William Herbert Kivett, Billy returned home to Honduras and a career as a governmental advisor, environmentalist and entrepreneur. He advised mayors on proper planning and brought electricity and water to remote areas of his country. Billy was instrumental in preserving Honduras’ largest lake, Yojoa, and starting a foundation to save trees. He opened three green houses and hired only single parents with the agreement they would put their kids in school. As a businessman, he ran an airline, sold opals and raised pigs, starting with five and increasing to 1,000 before selling out. Billy also founded the Rotary Club in Tegucigalpa. He died from cancer in Honduras in 2004 at the age of 62. Billy had a master ofregional and city planning from OU (1965). Interesting Lesser-known fact: When flying supplies to troops during the 1969 war with El Salvador, he encountered bad visibility and was asked his location. His reply: “If we see bullet holes in the wings, we are definitely over enemy territory.”