FLYJACK

Well, we know her statements to the FBI were contradictory/inconsistent. and I have evidence that her camp tried to front run a large scale Cooper ground search. Why,, because she needed to publicly plant a narrative in case Cooper and the money was found.

The thing is, Tina is hiding something from the FBI..... She may know more about Cooper than she is telling the FBI.

More of a CYA... Even Flo suggested Tina was hiding something..

False choice. It does support a theory when you add in other information.. not a plot or conspiracy.

I get it, acute traumatic events can affect memory, but I think this is different. Look at the events in sequence.. Tina and Flo give a detailed description of Cooper to produce sketch A, Flo doesn't like the sketch so it is predominantly from Tina's input.. Sketch A is to be revised with the input of all witnesses, Tina rejects it.. and re-iterates support for sketch A. Tina states she did not see Cooper's face straight on.. and elsewhere says she didn't see him well because he was bent over... sounds odd. The FBI uses Tina as their primary witness viewing images to eliminate suspects. So, Tina wanted sketch A to represent Cooper against the views of other witnesses.. when it was to be revised she claimed she didn't she his face straight on and her description oddly became both vague and precise.. Does anybody believe Tina did not see Cooper's face... she is largely responsible for sketch A. We know sketch A was a bad sketch and using that sketch for about a year certainly had a negative impact on the case. Tina was specific early for sketch A then became vague, misleading and reluctant to support sketch B.. Either she was deceitful about sketch A or her later statement about not seeing Cooper's face.. This is NOT consistent... It is one or the other.. there is no middle. Tina is hiding something,,

Sure, but why.... IMO, she did see Cooper's face but after sketch A was produced she changed her testimony... Her testimony became more vague, that is is a classic sign of deception. She is hiding something..

Remember, Sketch A was mostly Tina, why if she didn't get a look at Cooper's face straight on, Flo didn't like the sketch... She remembered his face for Sketch A then afterward she claimed she didn't see it.. that is not consistent. Tina was the go to witness to eliminate suspects from pics, how can that be if she didn't see Cooper's face.. If this ever went to court her statements would have discredited her.... FBI agent Larry Carr on Tina...

Looks to be working now...

From a book... https://books.google.ca/books?id=BVmrIisC9xwC&pg=PT123&lpg=PT123&dq="lyle+cameron"+"honduras"&source=bl&ots=sIo5do5i05&sig=ACfU3U38az44tQIHZCl1B0LO3hW85F8xsg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAkrie-rb8AhUpMTQIHa3BD70Q6AF6BAgYEAM#v=onepage&q="lyle cameron" "honduras"&f=false

or she is hiding something...

yes, it is all strange,,, and why was Cameron an FBI informant and not a CIA informant (maybe he was)... the FBI initially investigated him thinking he was compromised by the Russian's and then decided his foreign contacts could yield information so they recruited him,, seems that is CIA turf not FBI.. and this oddity,,, https://thecinemaholic.com/where-is-florence-schaffner-now/ "Plus, there is also the fact that Florence claims to have been stalked for months after the incident. She alleges that a man followed her and boarded several Northwest planes she was flying on, and when she finally confronted him, he revealed that he knew the hijacker from prison. Alleging that the latter wanted to talk to her, he apparently said to Florence, “I want to tell you, this guy is not just a hijacker. He was in the Bay of Pigs. This guy works for the CIA.” Thankfully, nothing ever became of it."

Lyle Cameron was an FBI informant (PSI) before NORJAK.. recruited based on his interactions with Russians. Cameron's connection to Jack Ruby.. Cameron was to publish the Cooper sketch and narrative. Cameron's strange death in Honduras..

Edwards is out to lunch,, He assumes Soderlind didn't have the AF flightpath while the FBI did. He falsely believes the pressure bump and oscillations are completely different events separated by minutes. Wrong. He fails to recognize that Ratazcak SAID he was manually flying the plane to just before Reno.. and Rataczak said he felt Cooper on the stairs. Why, because he was manually flying the plane. He fails to recognize that the FDR has the compass heading which Soderlind would have had. He fails understand that the "suburbs of Portland" comment was the call to Soderlind minutes after Cooper jumped.. Rataczak was giving a reference point... he did not say Cooper jumped in the suburbs of Portland.

I don't think the hair is a dog,, it looks like cashmere.. aka Goat hair.. Wool is very similar.. Tom's image from the tie... Wool and Cashmere.. Vintage (1970) Men's Cashmere overcoat.. Wool

This is amazing, for years I have been pointing out that Ulis had the tie manufacture date wrong.. He finally claims he figured it all out as 1964... no you didn't, we already knew it. and I have always said the only way this thing gets solved 100% is using new DNA tech.. Vince Petersen's hair is parted on the wrong side in all three images, the right.. Cooper was the left.

Dr. Roberts is off the reservation again.. the entire premise of this blog post is false. https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/23277907-d-b-cooper-and-flight-305-the-soderlind-track The SAGE map was available prior to Dec 2, 1971. It was in the possession of the FBI and forwarded. So, the FBI and Soderlind had the SAGE map prior to his Dec 4th jump zone analysis.

I saw that, probably an error by the writer,, Cossey has been consistent.. In another version of that doc that line appears to be crossed out with an initial.

Ok, here the FBI 302 from McCoy's hijacking... "change in pressure was felt".. they immediately went back to check and McCoy was gone.. The "hijacker" jumping causes a pressure fluctuation seen as rapid increase in oscillations on the needle of the pressure gauge,, an extreme fluctuation is also felt as a "bump"... Simultaneously, the bump is felt and an oscillation is seen on the gauge.

Similar.. For the McCoy hijacking the crew also noticed a pressure change when he jumped... But the key is whether there were any oscillations before the jump as he was on the stairs. For Cooper there were oscillation seen on the gauge culminating in a physical pressure bump aka large oscillation. This bump/oscillation sequence sequence has been interpreted differently, to move the LZ, IMO, the FBI got it right.

Interesting.. were they stable or fluctuating?

Interesting.. Can you ask McNally about his experience with the stairs.. (not sure if the plane was a 727-100 or 200, the airstair controls differ slightly) Opening them.. did they drop, how much.. there are two processes. Push the lever and they gravity drop, push the lever and the button they get hydraulic assist. Were the stairs stable or did they fluctuate move with his weight.. (Of course the plane speed was much higher than for Cooper) and about giving money to the stewardesses?

Is Brian 100% sure it was fabric softener or has his memory drifted over time? but they only separated few bills on top/bottom of the packets.. The bill Tom examined looks like it was from the middle,, based on condition. Somebody should ask Brian about the rubber bands in detail.. Where exactly were they attached, were they attached to all packets and all sides, when did they fall off.

Yes, see the extruded bezel around the pin that creates the large indent... most pins are flat.

IMO, there are two likely scenarios.. Cooper removed the pin/tack and replaced it with the clip for the hijacking because it may have helped ID him.. or.. Cooper got the tie without the pin/tack just prior to the hijacking.

Am I reading this right... They found two hands near Woodland in March 1972,,,