FLYJACK

I have been asked not to talk publicly or disclose my research that is not public... so there are limitations on what I can say, it makes things difficult. but if somebody else wants to they can bring it up.. IMO, it is a big deal and should be,

It should be saved for CooperCon.. I have told a couple people privately, I just don't think it should be made public yet. It is a big deal. Your argument about the wind is correct, I have been making the same one for years. The error I found recently takes it over the top...

Yes, they used an estimated SW wind direction drift, to the NE, I used a S-SE wind with a N-NW drift.. based on an error I found..

I am just applying Soderlind's analysis with the wind corrected to be S-SE... That means if Cooper pulled he would have landed under or slightly West of the flightpath depending on the variation in the heading of the plane at the time of the jump, not East. Very little of that area had a ground search. I still believe he jumped between roughly the Lewis and about Brush Prairie..

You are dodging... The closest was Salem, 70 miles away at 5PM.. wind was SSW,, how is that representative of the area Cooper likely jumped at about 8:12. It isn't.

I have the files and I am not the one that needs to read them, you keep making false claims about the data. It doesn't tell us the wind at the time and place of the "jump" not even close.

R99, You constantly refer to the wind data from Tom Kaye as evidence but it doesn't indicate what you think it does.. It was measured nowhere near the LZ and at the wrong times.. the only thing it tells us is that generally wind direction was consistent throughout altitudes. There is no useful data for wind direction anywhere close to the time and place of Cooper's probable jump in those files. If you can find specific relevant data in those files then post it.

Looks like Chaucer is just making the same argument I have made for years,, that the wind was shifting closest to the DZ/time.. and the wind data for the LZ time/place was unreliable. but that isn't new. What I have is new and everyone missed it for over 50 years... Not unprecedented, they missed the packing card for Cooper's back chute as well.

Of course you didn't read all my posts... To repeat. I found a simple error, it wasn't by Soderlind or the FBI.. they got bad data. The error is irrefutable.. it is not my opinion, speculation or conjecture, it is a fact.

Looks like Chaucer has been looking at the wind as well.. The argument he just posted on thecooperforum is the same one I have been making for years,,, completely ignored by the illuminati. points.. Tom Kaye's weather data is far from the LZ and the wrong time/date.. there is no data close at 8PM on the 24th. It does show wind direction was consistent throughout elevations. Weather Underground data for the 24th shows nearby winds shifting from the S-SE.. The data used for the LZ was an estimate of an average over an hour from Salem and Portland.. not very reliable for the LZ.. Portland is on an E/W River which affects winds differently. Winds tend to blow up or down a River not across. Salem is too far away and Portland is a unique location. But, I found something new, a simple error, Chaucer claims he has more info but reading his post I don't think it is the same thing I found though we appear to have the same conclusion.. Essentially, the wind data was wrong and the best/closest data we have is that it was from the S-SE around 8PM on the 24th in the zone. That puts the plane into a headwind and Cooper's potential drift under and slightly West of the flightpath (not East) depending on the heading at a given location, virtually no ground search on the West side.. they did do door to door canvassing. I am still examining this but it appears that if Cooper pulled he landed within a few miles on the West side of the flightpath. Legal disclaimers and fine print.. I believe the common flightpath map is accurate to 1 mile, later map revised to 0.5 mile.. that Cooper jumped between about the Lewis R to roughly just south of Battleground (Brush Prairie). The time stamps are accurate to within a minute. Rataczak was hand flying the plane, he said so. The FBI files are wrong on the autopilot. Rataczak said he felt Cooper on the stairs. Experts claim that wouldn't happen on autopilot. Rataczak called Soderlind in the suburbs of Portland which was many minutes after the "jump". Soderlind was listening and taking notes. Rataczak believes Cooper jumped nearer to the Lewis R. Rataczak was asked about Cooper jumping near Portland,, he said he was gone by then. The rapid increase in oscillations were visual on the gauge, the bump was an extreme oscillation. Needle begins oscillating rapidly and hits an extreme that is felt as a bump. This happened within seconds not minutes. No animals were harmed by this post. I am not responsible for any persons real or imagined that may get offended by this post.

The new search was a very small area, not comprehensive enough.

No, they did some early in '73 then decided no more..

Years ago, I suggested that the wind direction was possibly wrong but no proof. The FBI discussed this possibility in 1973 and established and planned new small area for a ground search, that area was never searched. The new error I discovered confirms 100% that the wind direction used in the LZ analysis was wrong. This is my revised LZ.. The most likely LZ is the top red triangle. Then the probability diminishes as you move south in the quadrants.

I can't reveal it publicly yet,, it may come up at CooperCon. I've been processing it and working on a revised LZ map based on Soderlind's analysis and correcting the error.. It was a simple mistake (not by the FBI or Soderlind) that nobody caught and it puts the LZ outside the ground search area. All analysis of the LZ has to be tossed and redone. and it is not the FP..

FBI part 84 https://vault.fbi.gov/D-B-Cooper /d.b.-cooper-part-84/view They ID a VHS tape of the drop test. SE 875

This is the toxic side of this forum and one of the reasons I decided to stop posting new research,,,, Insect contributes nothing but tries to discredit those that do.. For everybody else, the case has shifted, after 50 years primary case information has been discovered to be an error.. The ground search was in the wrong area, if Cooper pulled his LZ was 95% outside that area. If he was a no pull he was under the flight path and likely discovered.. Don't be an Insect, incorporate this info into your case knowledge, I am sure it will be explained in due time. This is not suspect specific and I am still working through the ramifications..

No, I discovered that the ground search area was based on a gross error, Soderlind and the FBI weren't responsible for the error but never caught it. Basically, Cooper's LZ is about 95% outside the ground search area. They did canvass door to door in a wider area but the comprehensive ground search area was based on an error. This is a game changer,, It isn't speculation or conjecture, I have the receipts.

Well, I found a massive error in the investigation.. Over 50 years and nobody caught it. It means that the ground search was in the wrong area.

That is not true.. it does jeopardize further advancements.. You have no idea what I have gone through to get that file produced. There was a prior FOIA that was rejected. I also had an opportunity to bring big money into the case and you screwed that.. Now would it be OK for me to post your private messages to me here. There is some really interesting stuff in there..

True, you did a FOIA for the document that I got done and had to wait two years for,, you got in weeks because of me not years. You benefitted from my work. I can take criticism, if it is valid. I already explained this to you in private, it is not something for the public. You know I am working on something big and you are jeopardizing it.. you are also undermining advancement of the case because you are nasty and selfish.. Now would it be OK for me to post your private messages to me here. There is some really interesting stuff in there..

I have some fascinating PM's from no doxxxing aka olemisscub,,, no doxxxing fed me unsolicited info about Ulis, talked about NickyB and trashed the Facebook group.. might be some other things in there.. I never reached out to him he kept sending me stuff. Maybe I'll post those.. Nobody should ever trust this guy.. He talks trash behind your back,,

There is nothing exculpatory in there, some differences and some the same. I have explained much of this before as the environment was completely different, the actions of crew and the FBI was not the same. You think it is going to be identical.. For the record, that was my FOIA got, I had to wait 2 years for it.. I was withholding it from the public though I shared summaries with some people,, has decided to undermine my case out of spite,, in fact he may have just ended us finding the solution. I kept it quiet to be able to advance case knowledge. That is how messed up this guy is. He knows I am working on a project and decided to try to screw me. is a fraud,, he has nothing in this case, wasted a year on a non-suspect Vordahl so he tries to ruin my project. Fortunately, I do have far more info.. trashes me for not sharing my info then pulls this stunt proving why YOU DON'T SHARE INFO WITH FRAUDS..

You aren't as bright as I thought you were.. The FBI included 5'8" as the lower bound for vetting suspects but you seem to think you are smarter than the FBI... The teeth are not exculpatory either,, I don't have the facts to explain the discrepancy but I can come up many possible reasons for it.

It isn't a crutch, that is your imagination, not fact,, you are writing a book, others are as well. I can't give out my suspect specific or case specific info publicly when I am working on my own project.. DON'T BE STUPID, In what world does that make sense. What is accomplished, I prove to you something I already know... when you lie about me and try to discredit me with a claim that you have no ability to know. THAT IS HOW YOU ROLL.. I am not attacking Vordahl, I am proving YOUR claims about the tie linking Vordahl to Cooper are false. You have no defence, there is no response to that fact. I never expected one because there isn't one.. I haven't made provably false claims.. You really think I don't know Hahneman's height(s) or the Cooper witness estimates. 5'9"-5'10" in shoes isn't exculpatory.. You clearly think it is and that is good, many people do and they are all wrong. I am not going to waste time with an irrational position.

Correct, you weren't as deep into the particles as Ulis.. You are smarter than Ulis but made similar errors.. I questioned the tie particle connection from the start. but you did a presentation at CC, you did many podcasts on Vordahl, you have a web page on Vordahl.. you defended him and attack me for taking rational positions.... A guy who has ZERO chance of being Cooper.. There are very good reasons I don't have a Hahneman page.. I am not against investigating theories even if they don't pan out, I have done that myself.. part of the process. But, you still won't quite admit the facts.. I am not being hostile, I am being rational. Can we assume you have now dropped him? It sounds like you have but won't admit it. If not that is fine.. My issue is people repeatedly elevating terrible suspects prematurely and polluting the environment with nonsense... it hurts the case and the credibility of the community. The Cooper case has become a joke to outsiders, a new suspect every week.... I have taken an intelligent approach to this case to get to a potential resolution, you are undermining it. and I don't play basketball... You are the one who is in a hole and you don't know what I have.. you make it up to discredit me, is that how you roll.