FLYJACK

A burp sack is a throw up bag. If Cooper checked the cards and those two cards belong to the two back chutes supplied to Cooper, chute 226 is a 1957 and 60-9707 is a 1960.. The newer 60-9707 chute is missing, he may have chosen it just because it was newer. My view on the dummy chute is Cooper tossed it, he didn't use it.. If he had opened it to carry something there would have been a part left behind. Where did the canopy go. It doesn't make sense that he would toss just the canopy. The harness didn't have D rings. Very hard to attach a chest pack. Can be done but not convenient. The dummy chute was not sealed and did not have a packing card, the other three did. Reports are that Cooper checked the chutes and removed the backchute cards. Since the dummy was not sealed and had no card Cooper probably tossed it being suspicious of FBI tampering or a possible beeper. If he knew chutes he would have known it was a bogus chute. Cooper most likely tossed it and didn't use it.

Cooper had thin lips and protruding lower...

That isn't the point.. you claim that there isn't enough evidence to eliminate KC but you haven't even read it all and you just reject what is known. The evidence does eliminate KC. He doesn't match the overwhelming evidence of Latin features/characteristics etc. description. You just make up an excuse, he had a tan. He resembles sketch A like tens of thousands of guys but does not match sketch B.. which was the most accurate one... you claim sketches are unreliable. KC was also bald.. he wore a wig.. His profile doesn't match either. So, KC doesn't match the description or the profile at all. And there is no evidence to support KC as Cooper. What you have done is just rejected the case evidence that doesn't match KC and made up your own so that leaves virtually no suspect evidence.. now with virtually no evidence a hundred thousand guys can be made to fit as a suspect. Then you top it with cherry picked indirect opinions 40+ years after the event. If you reject the evidence, you could randomly pick guys about the right age, make a case and get better suspects.

You haven't read all the files, you didn't even know that they investigated KC in 2004. (after you solved the case) We are beyond opinions, the case evidence rejects KC.. it is your opinions that rejects the evidence. The KC case and dealing with your logic and spin reminds me of this..

I challenged Ulis theories,, he attacked me, called me a troll and refused to acknowledge the facts I presented right from the FBI, just like you Blevins. Shutter challenged him as well. Reca was debunked by many very quickly. The case evidence is well known, you are the only one who is ignoring it. You brag about not reading the FBI files.. there is a reason. If you just reject the case evidence then anyone and everyone is Cooper.

That is your reality.. It is not the reality for anyone who actually knows the case evidence.

No Blevins, the evidence eliminates KC, not those who point it out. You just keep ignoring reality and manufacturing claims about those who point out the facts of the case, all to defend the nonsensical KC narrative. You lack reason and self awareness. Like a brainwashed cult member who is immune to any facts that contradict their orthodoxy. KC isn't Cooper, he does not match the basic description and there is NO evidence to support him. Cooper was Latin/Mexican possibly native American blood in features and appearance including olive/swarthy complexion. He had a full head of dark hair, wavy/curly/marceled slightly receding. His lips were thin with a lower protruding. If a suspect doesn't even match the basic description, he isn't Cooper.

Story is BS Blevins, She suddenly remembers an incident 40 years prior and conveniently times it two weeks before the hijacking.. People BS all the time. They are the least reliable form of so called evidence especially 40-50 years later. and all your other so called witnesses, you have none. They just tell you what they think you want to hear. You are gullible to anything that fits your narrative because of confirmation bias. These are not facts, these are opinions and claims. YOU HAVE NO FACTS. The strongest evidence you have is that KC resembles sketch A, like more than tens of thousands of guys, but that sketch was revised to the more accurate sketch B and KC doesn't resemble that one. KC doesn't even match the basic Cooper description. Kenneth Christiansen was not Cooper because there is no evidence to support it and the case evidence eliminates him.. KC is a joke of a suspect. Anybody who learns a basic understanding of the case knows it. The people who buy your book are those that have little to no case knowledge and don't know any better. and Sheridan was not Cooper either, for the same reasons,, his book is irrelevant. You are just pissed at what Snow did but blame everybody else for it. Serious people don't care about KC. The evidence eliminates him. Duane Weber, Kenneth Christiansen, Walter Reca and Barb Dayton are all in the total nonsense category... like Aliens and Bigfoot. Sheridan was slightly better but easily eliminated. McCoy was a very good initial suspect but also eliminated in more ways than one.

I can't recall the timing but wasn't that prior to the sled test. They had pinpointed the bump/oscillation time but were not sure if that was when Cooper jumped or went down the stairs. They extended the LZ range to the Columbia on the assumption that the bump/oscillation time might not be Cooper jumping.. after the sled test they refined it from about the Lewis R to Battleground..

Obviously nobody knows of the bomb was real except Cooper,, but I believe it was likely real. The reason it was dismissed as real was the colour.. The claim, all real dynamite was tan,, that was false. There was red dynamite like these above and they have very little printing and it was taped.. Cooper also warned the crew about the radio setting off the bomb,, might have been a ruse but I doubt it. If the bomb went off the radio transmissions could be blamed. Further, Cooper was afraid of Sky Marshal's. I can't imagine somebody hijacking with a fake bomb having the confidence to face Sky Marshal's. He didn't know who he would have encountered to convince the bomb was real. If somebody thought it was fake he would have been in a very vulnerable position, probably shot. A real bomb would have given him the confidence.. but if the bomb wasn't real then he probably would have had a concealed weapon for backup. So, I think it was likely real but if not then he had a backup weapon. Unlikely he only had a fake bomb, that is far too vulnerable. He only had to fool the stews but that wasn't a guarantee going into it. If he had a fake bomb and somebody called him on it, he could be dead.

Here, there were many more in news clippings but most not accurate.

Blevins, neither you nor KC is a threat to Hahneman.. You are projecting.. your own fears. The only threats to any suspect are the facts of the case. The hard part for this case is that there are a limited number of facts. Kenneth Christiansen is eliminated by the case facts.. Sketch A is not accurate, Sketch B is the most accurate according to the FBI.. KC does not resemble B. KC was not Latin/Mexican in appearance or features, he did not have olive/swarthy complexion, he did not have normal hair wavy/curly/marceled. His lips don't look to be thin with a protruding lower lip. Also, there is no evidence other than aged opinions. KC was investigated in 2004 including contacting NWA for personnel records. Note, he is named in the files.. because he was dead.

Here is a brief video clip of the sled test... nobody on the stairs a this point.

You think Darren's COOPER VORTEX interviews are NOT Cooper related, and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. Your persistently evolving event posts are spam.. 90% of what you post is irrelevant to the Cooper case. You've stated that you are done with the case.. I wasn't here when DZ got closed. I left for a few years when my father died. We don't agree to disagree, KC is only polarizing in your mind, there is no evidence for him and the evidence eliminates him.. case closed on Kenneth Christiansen. Even Lyle initially told the FBI he had no proof of anything. KC only got started as a suspect because Lyle claimed he resembled the description, like the POSTER.. then the KC narrative got backfilled with speculation and conjecture.. there is nothing there,, nothing. A complete waste of time. We now know you think KC, McCoy and Bing Crosby could be Cooper.. All can be eliminated by the evidence. Perhaps UFOs and Bigfoot are better suited for you. If you have evidence, not assumptions that eliminate Hahneman then do let me know.. You can question Hahneman all you want here. There is a difference between a healthy skepticism and spreading misinformation. See my FACT list for reference.

But, I have not made the case for Hahneman, see my list. So, you don't know what I have but keep falsely claiming you do know. It is a fact that you do not know what I have, right. Those are not empty claims, they are facts, you can go check them out all you want. Are you claiming any of them are false? I was not selling Hahneman, I was only pointing out the Cooper case evidence that happens to eliminate KC. Not because it eliminates him but because they are the facts of the case. They also eliminate most other suspects. You now say you don't have evidence to eliminate Hahneman or Bing Crosby. Crosby would be eliminated by the case evidence.... fair hair, blue eyes, not olive/swarthy or Latin. Then you said Hahneman would have been eliminated by the FBI, not McCoy. You don't know that, you have nothing but an assumption. Never ever use an assumption to eliminate. Use facts. I am not defensive, it is very frustrating dealing with you. You consistently ignore my statements and run with false claims over and over and over, like the FBI documents I told you I had. I prefer information to be accurate. It is a waste of time to have to correct your misinformation over and over. If you don't think Hahneman is Cooper with no evidence that is fine, but don't spread misinformation. You have made the case for Kenneth Christiansen, there is nothing there and the evidence easily eliminates him. You can make the case again but I am not interested in KC, maybe others are but the Cooper case evidence eliminates him. He is a waste of time. I understand you have to defend him but he isn't Cooper. You know it. If you spam the forum with your event stuff many of us will report you. That has nothing to do with Hahneman. If you stick to Cooper stuff we won't. No games. I am not into getting people banned but that stuff doesn't belong here.

You mean if they were faced with a copycat like McCoy thoroughly investigated him and posted lots of info naming him in the FBI files, the guy you think might be Cooper but not Hahneman. The FBI looked at KC and McCoy and according to your argument they would have been eliminated, but you think they could be Cooper. Just a bit inconsistent.. and ironically, the actual evidence eliminates them and not Hahneman. You have your logic back asswards. I already told you I have FBI documents. You have said many times I need FBI docs even after I told you I have them. You just forgot, right. So, you just make up stuff. How many times do you have to be told something before it penetrates.. my guess is there is no number high enough.. So, the fact that I have FBI docs makes your entire comment baseless according to your own statement. GET THIS.. I HAVE THE RECEIPTS You are completely incapable of reason and make up complete nonsense because you can't defend KC. You can't even defend your own flawed argument, you just ignore it. Realistically, Hahneman has nothing to with KC. The case evidence eliminates KC.. you just won't accept it. KC was not Cooper, everybody with a good understanding of the case knows there is no real evidence for KC and the evidence actually eliminates him. Kenneth Christiansen was not DB Cooper, he was not Latin/Mexican in appearance and features and he was not olive/swarthy, he did not have a full wavy/curly/marceled head of hair. There is no real evidence to support Kenneth Christiansen as DB Cooper. DO NOT waste your time on Kenneth Christiansen. Let's summarize yet again... These facts have already been stated but I can copy and paste when you ignore them in your next posts. (Nov 9, 2021) I stated that the FBI looked at Hahneman, the crew even claimed he was Cooper. FACT I stated that I found a gross error by the FBI that if believed would eliminate Hahneman. FACT I stated that he had a very high level connection intervening on his behalf. FACT I stated that Howard E Hunt was questioned about Hahneman's involvement in the CIA's Guatemalan coup. FACT I stated he was not a copycat, a US Official said he had planned his hijacking for year. FACT I have much more than newspaper clipping and a sketch including FBI docs and other stuff. FACT I stated that Haheman's NAME was redacted in FBI docs whereas other dead suspects were not. FACT I have NOT presented the case and don't think any body else should accept Hahneman as Cooper. FACT I have not found any evidence that eliminates Hahneman. FACT The FBI stated that Sketch B is the most accurate. FACT The evidence eliminates Kenneth Christiansen.. KC is not Cooper. FACT

Liar.

Hahneman is irrelevant, I blocked you for the same thing last year. Your arguments are a rats nest of nonsense, what I don't like is your lies and complete distortion of my posts. You have no self awareness. You just don't contribute anything worthwhile.. that isn't a requirement here but you cross the line with your event spam. Go have your party in the woods, we don't want to hear about the model of generator you will use endlessly for months. Ok, don't say you weren't warned..

I blocked you last year when you started your endless event spamming.. Many of us have discussed this, and we will report you en mass and block you if you do like last year. A mention here and there isn't a big deal but flooding the forum with lengthy and endless updates for your event for months is spam and this is not the place for it. I already want to block you again. You aren't adding anything to the Cooper case discussion and using this place as your personal facebook page is disrespectful.

How about this Flyjack? Be there in July, or be square. I figure you are either Canadian, or pretty close to it somewhere. Not asking, just an educated guess. If so, you should know all about camping. And July is easy for such things. I am Canadian, I camped lots when I was younger, I hate it now. What you are doing isn't camping, it is a backyard party in the woods.. You are trying to buy friends, up to you but that isn't Cooper related and doesn't belong here. If you are going to flood this forum with this spam for the next 8 months, I will report you and recommend everyone block you.

True, I didn't explain it. Cooper was probably in Vietnam and a very common "grudge" for retuning men was disillusionment with the war.. Nixon announced the wind down in 1969.. although it took five years it began before NORJAK. I also have other pieces evidence that supports this idea but since it can't be proven I don't feel like sharing the theory.. and being accused of crazy things.

Ouch,,, a big misfire from you.. and what a completely nutty post. Typical Blevins. It has to be unwound completely to straighten it out. Cooper was 45-50 for NORJAK, right, that puts him at prime age for WW2. Regardless, it is most likely Cooper was in Vietnam, but at that age he probably wasn't a low level soldier. Hahneman was in WW2 on an aircrew, he was also in Korea and Vietnam. He was a radar/communications tech and claimed paratrooper experience in Vietnam but I have not been able to confirm that. I was the one who dated the tie at around 1965, I never said the the tie dated to WW2 or Korea.. that is ridiculous. My point was that somebody of Cooper's age in Vietnam wouldn't be a low level soldier but would have advanced to the higher ranks or as a specialist, perhaps a contractor. They could have worn cheap clipon ties 1965-1971.. I agree with Parrot, the young soldiers wouldn't be wearing ties. So, your critique of my comments is shear lunacy, it really shows a complete lack of comprehension on your part. You are trying to ridicule me and have completely misunderstood and distorted my comment.. Do you actually believe what you wrote? You are just not a serious person.

US Government Corruption in Vietnam and elsewhere..

That was just what Tom Kaye said.. it was sodium chloride but not regular table salt. My understanding is sodium chloride tablets are different.

Cooper was 45-50,, probably in WW2 and/or Korea.. not a regular soldier, he would have been a higher rank, specialist or a contractor at that age. They could have worn ties, clipons. The tie was about 6 years old when left on the plane, the particles probably accumulated from many environments over that time. People keep trying to make them fit one event/environement. That is unlikely.