FLYJACK

Shutter and I had already eliminated the Hick's placard before the Edward's book... Norjak did NOT have the optional emergency airstair release... never had that specific decal.

Ray Ban Balorama is very close... Ray Ban Chalet is a good runner up..

Died in the jump.. based on evidence very unlikely. If he pulled he lived. Carr thinks that since everyone talks Cooper must have died not to talk,, Cooper did talk, the FBI just never discovered it. Jump location. New data analysis, not used by Soderlind supports an 8:11 jump… I would say with 95% to be conservative (100%) certainty. A Battleground or Orchards jump is off the table. Larry did say on DZ Cossey got the back chutes from his house. Maybe before he learned about Hayden. “NB6” is NOT a fact it is an unsubstantiated claim by Cossey, a serial liar and even though he was required to keep his packing records he never supplied them to confirm his claim.. Cossey’s description of the missing chute does not match the packing card or Hayden’s description.. Objective analysis of the evidence indicates it is very unlikely that the missing container was an NB6. It is NOT a FACT. Cossey falsely claimed he was paid for it and the chute left behind was returned.. Cossey's NB6 claim is not verified and NOT a fact. Height. Both wrong on height.. The FBI noted in the files to NOT reject a suspect based on height, they used 5’8” as a lower bound. I assume because of reported variances and shoes... Cooper was seated most of the time, when Flo wrote 6’1” she had NOT seen Cooper standing after he was known to be the hijacker. In the Hahneman case, I have documented 20 witness accounts describing his height between 5’10” and 6’, witness height recall is just not very accurate, studies have proved this. The first Cooper description was 5’9”-6’,, Height is a recall estimate based on many variables,,, Cooper’s initial weight was 150-175 and med to stocky, at 6’ tall that is thin. Cooper was later described as average to well built.. 170-180 lbs average to well built matches 5”10” not 6’... Sketch A vs B.. Still wrong Ryan, your argument is speculative not objective.. that date error is not causative, it is incidental. The process for sketch B was more comprehensive and being done anyway. Both Murphy and LD Cooper were liked by witnesses and they look like B not A. Three witnesses together is big NO-NO… The FBI said in the files that Sketch B is the best likeness… though not needed for the argument an undisclosed image I have supports B. There is no evidence to support A over B, none. The witnesses liked suspects that matched B NOT A.. Bill Mitchell saw strange socks,, maybe a jump suit.

Not hard to tell, no match. The other side is a different decal altogether.

Maybe, but we already knew about the dogs... Did they eat the containers as well? Could be both..

Cooper took food...

A few corrections... Horn rimmed glasses are not defined by the corner shape but by the frame material. Originally there were wire frame and horn/tortoise frame glasses.. plastic/acetate replaced horn/tortoise but the name remained. Horn rimmed refers to thick plastic frames that replaced/mimicked horn/tortoise frames.. So, Cooper's glasses can be wraparound AND horn rimmed.. Cooper's glasses in the sketch closely match Ray Ban Balorama's or Chalet.. There were a few similar styles that could have prescription lenses.. Balorama's.. Ray Ban Chalet. The sunglasses Cunningham found were NOT Cooper's.. they have no bottom rim. Like the FP time shift and Skip the Vortex is getting polluted with nonsense. Aslo.. The Hick's placard was debunked years ago. No, Norjak did not have the decal that matches the Hick's placard. There was an optional emergency release for 727's which had a handle in the stairwell and below from outside access, NORJAK did not have this option. There were a few different decals used on the outside of 727's. Hick's placard. Note the number of lines and length/position of lines. NORJAK, it is missing most of the decal.. text lines do not match Hick's placard.. Pursuit of DB Cooper plane, decal also missing part of the decal.. also does not match Hick's placard. Same location as Norjak. Not all 727's had the same placard's there were several different placards used at that location. Norjak did not have that specific Hick's placard.

Blevins posted this.. Cooper sleuth Meyer Louie passes away...

Not sure if they rejected suspects only based on prints. I never used DNA or print results as the sole reason for elimination. It was probably more of a fishing expedition,,,

Very astute.. If the DNA is a dead end and the prints have no value,,, How do we put a suspect on the plane and solve this 100%?? This is the dilemma I have been working on..

That is a washed out photo and he looks younger there, no turkey neck.. I posted images that accurately show his forehead details.. Get real Ryan. No way those EXTREME forehead lines were NOT noticed by witnesses.. not one. Just those extreme forehead lines alone eliminates him. His nose is irrelevant. This is closer to the hijacking...

I don't have to find anything,, The FBI stated Sketch B is the most accurate. Your argument is speculative. The actual construction of your argument is flawed. It is nonsense and ignores the context. Your premise's are bad. The error is the ONLY reason for B,, nonsense You claim that 3 witnesses sitting together is somehow more reliable. False. This is never done, they can influence each other. Witnesses should be interviewed separately. and Murphy was liked by witnesses, he matches B very well below the sunglasses, sketch A does not. You have an opinion with nothing to back it up. B is more accurate, the evidence indicates it, the FBI said it and the process was more comprehensive. Murphy sketch A vs B... B is much better.

Cooper jumped at 8:11, I have new data and it is irrefutable. He did not jump later. I always felt it may have been as far south as Battleground but no longer. I won't post the data because it wouldn't matter to most and I am using it for my project. This is NOT Cooper's forehead Ryan.. These are not average forehead lines, these are extreme deep lines that go right down the temple. No Cooper witness mentioned forehead lines like this. Skip was not Cooper. Any objective person can understand this. This is the equivalent of Reca's nose.... and he doesn't have wavy, curly, marcelled hair... Skip may be an interesting guy but he clearly was NOT Cooper. Sketch A vs B... more nonsense.. Sketch B is the best likeness... It is essentially a widened version of A with the nose also proportionally widened. It is also aged and coloured. I have lots of evidence to support this maybe one day I'll post it but I don't think people really understand it with the misinformation out there.. sketch B was not created ONLY because of an error, that was incidental not causative. Ryan's argument that the error caused B and therefore B is not accurate is unfounded speculation. It is a logical non-sequitur. The FBI said B is the most accurate and I have undisclosed evidence that proves B is more accurate.. though still a composite sketch. The idea that a Cooper suspect must match A and not B is actually insane.

I have zero interest in Tosaw's opinions and actions... His contribution to the case is his book because he interviewed so many relevant people,, It is very accurate in that context, of course Cossey lied to him and there are some minor errors here and there... even Alice liked the book.. but overall it is a very important Cooper book.

Updated analysis Cooper left the plane between 20:11 and 20:12. While not conclusive it is very strong new evidence. If Cooper jumped then he could have drifted up to 6 miles if he pulled right away, or if he pulled late 1 mile drift and he might be virtually under the path as it has a 1 mile error. Depending on the wind direction at that location he could have landed just N of the Lewis R. I would estimate a 20:11 - 20:12 jump at 95%...

Tosaw named the people he spoke with, odd he didn't mention Bill.. but, point is if Mitchell boarded before Cooper that is why Cooper chose the left side...

In Tosaw's book the F-106's got behind flight 305 heading at 148 degrees that is SSE,, and essentially eliminates the Western flightpath.

Was Cooper the last to board or second to last?? and if he was second to last who was last? Flo, thought second to last.. ' Gregory though he might have been the last to board.. Tosaw's book Mitchell was before Cooper, but he didn't speak to Mitchell. he did speak to the stews. Mitchell wasn't sure.. It appears Cooper was likely second to last to board but after Mitchell, perhaps Gregory was last.. if so that may be why he would have chosen the left side.

Tosaw's book is very accurate but he did rely on others for info. Cossey assisted Tosaw for his book,,, and lied. Cossey given credit for assisting... This is a lie... to cover Cossey's conflation of Hayden's rigs with his personal rigs. More lies... from Cossey, claims he was paid $50 for Cooper's rig and the other rig was returned to him.

The argument was always that he took the matchbooks because of fingerprints.. nope That is false.. he left many potential sources for prints (cig butts, cups, magazine, tie,,, etc..) and even offered money to the stews.. Cooper did not care about prints, probably had prints obscured. If he didn't care about prints then why take the matchbook he had brought... the only reason I can think of is it had writing in it and that is supported in the files. Smokers often used matchbooks to write notes.. before smartphones

Notes in the matchbook... that is why he took it.

The TBAR serial numbers are listed in the FBI files, there are 315 bill SN's listed but many are partials that means two partial numbers could have been one bill. The 280 was an estimate.. there were reports one packet was smaller than the other two. Later, partial serial numbers were combined or deciphered and a bill serial number completed, not new bills found. There were not 300 bill's fully identified. This has been a conflation of two different measures.. the bill estimate of 280 and bill SN's confirmed. You can't add 20 new serial numbers to the bill estimate. Confirming 20 bills later does not add to the total number of bills it adds to the bill SN's completed.

Matches were ubiquitous back then.. you could pick them up anywhere, having 1 book wouldn't be a factor. 302's are written from agents notes so they aren't precise. and.. Tina getting them from a cabinet isn't a typical error, it was either completely made up or true. I do lean slightly toward true but wouldn't bet on it.. if it wasn't true then Tosaw was outright lying, I can see an error or misunderstanding but not an outright lie.. there was nothing to gain by it.

DO NOT accept Cunningham's timeline, it is NOT correct. He is out by 2 minutes at the Columbia.. Do NOT let this misinformation become case evidence. This case is tough enough already. and the number of bills was estimated at 290/$5800, they did NOT find more bills they identified more serial numbers, that it NOT the same thing.. Originally they did not identify 280 complete bill numbers then find more. The estimated 280 bills, they were not all complete serial numbers. All they did was complete some of the unidentified serial numbers using fragments. They did not add to the 280. They did not account for all 300 bills. One packet was smaller. Likely some eroded but can't rule out a few were missing. Not likely, but possible. It is likely there were 3 packets of 100 bills each $2000 = $6000 but they did not account for all of them,, and did not fully identify all the (280) serial numbers. Also, the Skychef matchbook... Tosaw interviewed Tina and says in his book that she grabbed them from a cabinet when Cooper's matchbook ran out. While Tosaw does not get absolutely everything correct this may be the source of the Skychef matches and not Cooper. Weather.. There is no precise weather/wind data for Cooper's jump time and location,, we have general reports some distance and time away.. The FBI weather data was applied as a proxy, it was not precise. Best indication was the wind in the area was shifting between SSE to SSW around that time.

You need to challenge your own bias and logic.... because you have some things very wrong. Being wrong isn't a big deal but using that ignorant position to attack others is. Take a step back and re-evaluate. I know you can do better.