FLYJACK

A true mentalist would know how Carr thinks... and where to find his posts. Maybe you are on the wrong flightpath...

If you can't find them then you aren't much of a sleuth...

Don't think so,, ticket agent said he was in a long line and came up in rotation. Cooper's ticket was ...773,, Mitchell's was ...777, not definitive but suggests Mitchell was after Cooper.

Fraud,, If you have the unpleasant displeasure of listening to the Reca tapes Carl leads Reca with all the information imbedded in the questioning. Still, Reca gets a lot of stuff wrong..

IMO, he is worse only because he wanted to jump out the side door and claiming the Eastern flightpath and a massive FBI coverup with zero evidence...

not a shred of evidence presented ever... and all the evidence eliminates Reca and the ridiculous narrative.. Carl coached Reca and led him in the taped interviews, but Carl was a poor researcher and got the case facts wrong,, Now, the Reca crowd has to make up a massive conspiracy with no evidence to cover for Carl's errors... Reca is just more noise in the Cooper case.. add it to the crap pile.

Fraud...

Frauds..

No, it is up to you to prove 305 took an Eastern flightpath and all the evidence is fake with a massive coverup.. You (or the Reca camp) don't provide any evidence because you can't and there isn't any.. Do not waste any time or money on any Walter Reca book or documentary.. these guys are frauds..

Just propaganda.. and completely absurd. Like I said ZERO evidence that 305 went East,, overwhelming and irrefutable evidence it went south on Victor 23... The Reca camp has no evidence, the entire narrative is manufactured. It is a con to get a documentary made... Do not waste time or money on these people, books or a documentary.

This guy is worse than Blevins and Reca is actually worse than Kenny Christiansen as a suspect.. hard as that is to believe. Slim King is just shilling for the Reca camp polluting this thread with incoherent propaganda... he must be related to Joe Koenig. If anyone is considering a documentary on Walter Reca, don't. Do not waste your money on a ridiculously manufactured narrative.. The Reca camp has him wanting to jump out the side door which would be instant death.. they got the door wrong.. Cooper wanted the rear door open, maybe they can blame it on that 8th grade education.. and they have the flightpath completely wrong. To support it they claim a massive coverup with no evidence which would include the pilots, Seattle ATC, Portland ATC, Ground Control, NorthWest Airlines, The Air Force, Sage radar, the chase pilots, the military search, the FBI search, the transcripts, the FBI documents... There is zero evidence to support an Eastern flightpath. Do not waste time and money on a ridiculous suspect and bogus narrative.. Walter Reca is not DB Cooper Walter Peca is not DB Cooper

What facts, you have no facts.. three books on somebody who isn't Cooper means nothing.. now a documentary, we are getting to the real motivation to sell Reca here on the forum, one of the worst Cooper suspects ever... if a documentary ever comes to pass on Reca add it to the junk pile with many others... This is a troll comment.

Now you are just back to being a troll...

They aren't great books because Reca was not Cooper now are they. Reca does not fit the witness descriptions. Reca got the very basic facts of the case wrong. Reca speaks at an eighth grade level with a unique speech pattern. Carl led him in the tapes with questions. Carl researched the case before he made the tapes. Reca gave none of the hijacking details. Reca does not match evidence about Cooper I have found. There is no evidence for Reca other than wild speculation. The Reca camp claims a massive coverup with no evidence to address all the above.. if you do that then anyone can be Cooper. The Reca narrative is a joke.

No, many many people were qualified for that jump, in fact Reca sounds over qualified. He is easily eliminated. and it is not my FBI,,, it is yours.

Whose confession tape? Cooper or Reca? I have heard Reca, he is not Cooper, he gets facts completely wrong, lacks hijacking details, speaks with an 8th grade education and a unique speech pattern... and is led by questions from Carl.. Reca is a joke, don't waste my time with this garbage. Carl researched the Cooper case then coached Reca for the tapes,, unfortunately Carl is a poor researcher and Reca repeated incorrect information.. case close, Reca is not Cooper, it is a scam.. I am sure you know it because nobody outside of the Reca camp pushed the side door exit and Cle Elum flightpath nonsense. Your little game is not going to convince anybody here, try the Cooper facebook group...

which part?

"Jack's" suspect is Gossett based on profiling.

Hmmm,,

Shilling and Reca nonsense, they claim he used superglue on his fingers.. Reca was not Cooper, he is an absurd suspect.

When did you talk to Cooper?

because of all the items he left that could have had his prints.. Cooper wasn't worried about prints,, he took the items that had writing on them, including the matchbook. and as Georger pointed out,, no good prints were found..

FYI, I know a lot more about this case and Cooper than most of those book authors.. read them all if you wish...

I did primary research.. books are secondary.. In most cases, the authors have discussed their books publicly or the synopsis is published.. most books can be dismissed easily if you know the case well. Some books give you primary research, stick to those.. Though all books contain errors.. some more-so than others.

I intentionally did not read any until I had thoroughly researched the case. Without a high case knowledge level you can't read them critically.. I have since read some and ignored most based on obvious critical flaws. Primary Cooper research doesn't come from somebody else's opinion in a book. The better ones lay out the facts... the junk has critical facts wrong and tries to sell a suspect.