FLYJACK

I can't find that gauge on the pilot's panel, only on the engineer's panel. Where is it, post a picture..

Wrong, it is identical to the one on the engineers panel. There is a separate settings panel. I checked the pilots panel and it is not there.. This is the Boeing 727 engineers panel..

https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/22892452-d-b-cooper-and-flight-305-the-b-stewardess These notes are in the Gray files and well known.. Flo's initial description in the notes was early after she had initial contact with the hijacker and he was seated... Later, Flo had more direct contact with the hijacker before she left the plane.. She revised her description.. to 6 ft mid 40's.. Because she had a subsequent interaction with the hijacker there is no indication the first description is more accurate.

The rate of climb (descent) gauge I posted and the one I have been referring to is on the engineers panel on the 727.. I have it right..

The rate of climb (descent) gauge is not absolute it is relative. It measures a differential. If you disagree take it up with Anderson. Q2: Is it correct that the intent of the report from the crew was that the cabin climb rate guage indication had oscillated? A (Anderson): "It was the "rate of descent" gauge that detected the so-called "pressure bump." Two guages are used to detect the disruptions of airflow. (1) the Differential Pressure/Cabin Altitude (which serves as a dual function guage); and (2) rate of climb, or, rate of descent guage."

Yes, it did,, Anderson said so.. The rate of climb gauge is a relative indicator,,

yes,, but Gossett is not a new suspect and many of Jack's claims/guesses are way out there..

match cover..

This is Jack,, https://thecoopervortex.podbean.com/e/db-cooper-s-criminal-profile-robert-fuller/ His "suspect" isn't new,, it is Gossett

Nope,, Anderson mentions this gauge.. "A: It was the "rate of descent" gauge that detected the so-called "pressure bump." Two guages are used to detect the disruptions of airflow. (1) the Differential Pressure/Cabin Altitude (which serves as a dual function guage); and (2) rate of climb, or, rate of descent guage." The image I posted is from a 727,, it detects the pressure differential between the outside and inside the cabin. This allows the crew to adjust the internal cabin pressure to make the passengers more comfortable during altitude changes.. Now, normally the cabin is pressurized and the needle moves slowly up or down above or below the zero mark. Norjak was unique as the jet was unpressurized with the rear door open and a hijacker on the stairs.. During the oscillations the altitude was constant at about 10,000 ft. and the external pressure was steady, however, the hijacker on the stairs caused the cabin pressure to fluctuate and that would be reflected in the needle on that gauge oscillating up and down around the zero mark. This wasn't normal and caught the crew's attention. So, the needle is oscillating showing the differential between the steady outside pressure and fluctuating cabin pressure due to Cooper on the stairs,, the bump was caused by the stairs retracting creating an extreme pressure fluctuation resulting in both an extreme needle oscillation and being felt by the crew. There is no other explanation than Cooper leaving the stairs.. The bump was also an oscillation,, this occurred minutes before the 8:15 call to Soderlind. The start of the rapid visual oscillations and bump oscillation occurred within seconds not minutes.. not 5 or 10 minutes apart, that is impossible. The FBI/Soderlind LZ is 8:09-8:15 with the sweet spot at 8:12 and probability diminishing at the extremes..

Filing a flight plan in the air... Cooper knew that.

Tracked down the Boeing 727 McCoy hijacked,, it went to Everett Community College

727 rate of climb gauge.. needle oscillates above and below 0... an extreme oscillation is shown by the needle and felt by a bump... a "bump" felt is an oscillation on the needle...the bump was an extreme oscillation.

You have nothing... Reca is a joke...

So, there is no lie.. just normal procedures to control the information in an investigation. You still have nothing. You are doing exactly what you accuse others of.. wasting our time and muddying the forum with Reca nonsense. Go to the Facebook site and waste their time, they have thousands of members, there are really only a handful here.. where you have zero impact.

Yes, many more people on the reddit Cooper thread, Nobody here will ever entertain the garbage Reca narrative...

Like I said, you have no evidence..

Cut the crap.. You are just making it up, you make the same claim over and over with ZERO evidence. When asked for evidence, you engage in some childish personal attack because you have none. Reca is a joke here everybody knows it.

The evidence is there, they just ignore it or twist it. You should have seen Chaucer's now hidden 45 minute video trashing Rataczak.. one of the craziest things I have ever seen in this case.. completely unhinged. Now Ulis has some crazy video to explain his Western Flight Path, riddled with logical errors.. Everybody thinks they can reinvent the wheel, The FP is solid and the LZ is solid. The FBI/Soderlind got it right..

It isn't the job of the FBI to tell you anything or help you... that isn't their mandate. They made errors and held back information but to claim they lied in a massive coverup involving everyone needs evidence, you have none. Where did the FBI lie?

They were told by Northwest not to talk... FBI had nothing to do with it. Nice try though..

Chaucer and Edward's just won't accept the evidence and continue to try to push the LZ southerly... Now, they jump on the "prior to 8:15" comment... taking it out of context.. https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/22881710-d-b-cooper-and-flight-305-the-jump-time The prior to 8:15 comes from Rataczak's statement that Cooper jumped after last contact with the hijacker at 8:05 and the call to Soderlind 5 to 10 minutes later.. which was in the suburbs of Portland. That means Cooper jumped before the 8:15 call to Soderlind which is approximately Battleground and the southern point of the LZ... Soderlind took notes.... There is no revelation, nothing new, nothing that moves the LZ, nothing that disputes the FBI's analysis... It is a nothing burger. There were two comms from Rataczak about the jump,, He immediately stated to ATC "mark your shrimp boat".. this is not in the transcript but there was a 14 minute gap due to the wrong sector/frequency. That may explain why it isn't there.. The ATC returns at 8:13 so the comment would be prior. After a few minutes he called Soderlind in Minneapolis at about 8:15,, in the suburbs of Portland.. That confirms that Cooper jumped minutes before 8:15.. exactly where all the evidence indicates.. 8:15 refers to the time of the call to Soderlind... he took notes.. The only way you can move the LZ South of Battleground is to prove that the bump was not Cooper leaving the plane and that no bump occurred later when he did jump.. Good luck with that. Cooper jumped minutes before the 8:15 call to Soderlind in the suburbs of Portland... 8:10-8:13 depending on the timing source.

Who told you he had his own forum.. that wasn't Larry and when was his first post?

Are you sure you got all of them..

"Dan Cooper" is on the Portland passenger boarding list,, I think there was another list taken of passengers in Seattle.. without him.