mrshutter45

He makes an interesting statement here: How do you know Dawn Andrusko couldn't afford to repay Christiansen on the loan she asked her brother to obtain from Christiansen? She had a good job, and received child support payments. You make a lot of assumptions and you haven't even checked out the witness statements for yourself. You keep saying...'it just COULDN'T have happened that way...' etc but the truth is you don't know. She has a good job, she gets extra money from child support, and yet ask's a friend instead of a bank for a loan? didn't he call his gang last week of possibly someone contacting them? what he doesn't know is it's possible it's not true. this is an extra $2,500 a year. 1971, it's a lot of money. must of been one hell of a job. lets just see if the records show a purchase in April of 1972 in Buckley Washington Sounds almost like pocket change to Dawn? I guess Robert has all of her financial info as well to back this up? she paid Kenny back each month with almost half of his monthly salary? WOW. Was that large amount needed for a down payment in 1971? if it wasn't, she had enough to spare to get what ever she wanted. it doesn't add up, or make sense. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"On the other hand, when I look at the picture of the tie clip, I see a design that looks sort of common, so who can say?" You have repeatedly stated she identified the clip, not the black tie. Beep, beep. the Knoss train start backing up. You do realize you show a picture of Kenny wearing a black tie with a tie bar, and not the clip in question. From your very own site.... "However, she immediately identified the tie-tac on it as one she had seen Kenny Christiansen wear many times." Now, you want to claim it might be similar? this is called attacking the evidence. ADDED: still more inaccurate information on your site.... "Christiansen made very little from the airline, and went through at least four times his yearly income within nine months after the hijacking." Source please! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Um, thought you were busy, busy, busy? Trying to base KC on new evidence is ridiculous Robert. a lot of damage has taken place. new people coming into it will not change the past! "And you really shouldn't talk to me about 'closing doors'" The only door closed was on you for the following reasons you fail to notice! you shut the door on yourself. my doors are wide open. *****PLEASE READ & UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING REASONS ROBERT WAS BANNED FROM A SITE***** For the record. you obviously read Bruce's blog where I stated you were not welcome on my forum. I don't recall stating you were not allowed to VIEW it. then two days after the start of the forum you registered under the name DungeonsWizard. 10 days later you revealed who you really were. you were BANNED from the forum. this included your IP, just like it's done here! so, what did you do? you jumped on hidemyass.com and started taking screenshots (illegally) of a poster talking about you. absolutely nothing was said about you until your little stunt was performed. that's why you were BANNED, and that's why you can no longer VIEW it easily. you also agreed to the rules when you registered. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

I really don't care what you think Robert, it's what you say! I'm simply showing the flaws in your statements. my how we once again close the door, but I'm sure you will open it up in a page or two..... wrong as usual. nothing bad is said about you on the other site Robert, other than months ago! we are attacking your story...big difference truth seeker! you never did prove Cook wrong in the first place anyway "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

He has no problem dishing it out does he? he quickly goes into the sympathy mode diverting it to his advantage. poor Robert. He never admitted to anything, he simply words it differently to fit it right back into place, or the ever so popular, "it doesn't change anything" The last time I checked, I only asked questions. I don't recall attacking him. I'm attacking the evidence. light at the end of the tunnel is visible now. He whines that he can't see the site. He laughs saying he can view the site anytime he wishes? He whines that KC wouldn't be discussed on the site. He whines that he can't defend what is said on that site. He refuses to answer questions about it here? Do rabid dogs really eat there young? The guy flip flops through everything, and we are supposed to believe what is said from these people? yes, trust is an important factor here isn't it. ADDED: I also like the "nice approach" several of you go by. ever heard of "good cop, bad cop" the "nice approach" doesn't always work. they bring in a guy who isn't so nice in order to get the truth to surface. dancing with them is a partnership you don't want. they can play you right into there palms. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"Why don't we agree on something here. You can believe everything I've researched on Christiansen is wrong, that he wasn't Cooper, and everything I've presented on him is inaccurate. Just go with that and move on." Robert, you have to admit you have many inaccuracies. Can you really believe someone remembered the tie clip from 40 years ago? Kenny would have to have worn it often, and yet Dawn had barely known Kenny, how can this be reliable first hand knowledge? You labeled a document that belongs to the property the house is on. then claimed it was purchased for $10. the FBI has this information. Carolyn Powell gives information that is inaccurate. she also hardly knew Kenny, but claims money was found on the property. Where is the article you claim was in the Bonney lake newspaper asking about the money? you save everything. No actual proof of any stamp/coin collection has ever surfaced. Kenny purchased a large lot prior to the 70's, and sold it before he died at $17,000 an acre. he had over a dozen acres. this is a very obvious clue that shouldn't of been left out. that's called, hold it...slanting the story, or failing to recognize other possible options. I never read your book, but from reading the reviews they claim you tell a story of following the money. here you say the opposite, and claim everything is no longer relevant, or doesn't change anything? Now, to date I don't believe people have little cartoons they frequently use to tease and poke fun of your story like you have done with Marla. it also appears looking at the above that you share the same block of cheese with Marla. it seems Marla hit a nerve with you. the story plowed right over KC, and Gray's book, and, she was able to get the FBI's attention. then you find out she wants to make a movie and a book out of it. who else has similar motives? Your story is very similar. you claim things are not true about Marla's witnesses, but you quickly call the people involved with your story and warn them of trouble? you then try and discredit people involved with looking into the KC saga. the very one's who found the admitted problems with the story? what would yo do if you read on Marla's Facebook that she was warning people not to talk to you? I'd say you would plaster it all over the place trying to discredit her story more. that's exactly what you would do! you claim the FBI doesn't give enough information on things like the chute. you claimed the police are not giving enough information into the death of Cossey, but feel compelled to block information about your story? even warning people! why is it ok for you to do it, but not the FBI, or other LE to give information on a need to know basis? here is another term you like to use....double standard! one sided stories don't go over well with people. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"Someone on that other site contended that Cooper left a note on the plane - that is NOT TRUE." Wrong Jo. the discussion was about McCoy. not Cooper. nobody said Cooper left a note behind. It's not hard to follow at all. I have different categories. that's the only difference. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

you have been bringing it up for months? It should have no bearing on anything about investigating KC. most of the people from the other site found the known problems with the story. you even accepted those faults. As mentioned before. I don't need your help. it's always nice to have it while investigating a story, but that's not a deal breaker. every story leaves a trail of dates, and times. documents can shed light on the dates, and times. the mortgage helped prove this point. cops have the same problem. the bad guy isn't going to just give up the info. I don't trust you, so, I will need to look into it myself. I will supply everything needed to backup what has been found whether it helps, or hurts the story, and whether you like it or not...it will be researched out to it's fullest. you can clam up, or you can answer questions. either way something will come of it. the record of it's past tells me it won't be good. I don't think anyone is doing this, or asking questions for slanted reasons Robert. people deserve the entire story. way to much speculation is into the whole thing. I didn't have Marla's blessing either, nor did you. I showed what grannies house looked like before she showed the actual pictures. I found documents showing a trail left behind from someone who was supposed to be "hiding". even Marla questioned the birth issue of LD I found. Lets see how much swiss cheese will surface "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

why do you constantly whine about it Robert? you are the only person that brings it up. perhaps you should go back to the filthy comments. it's way over due for reporting? For someone who could care less, sure does bring it up often? I DON'T NEED YOU ROBERT..... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"And since Shutter chose to block AB's office computers from even VIEWING (not posting we understand, a complete block from viewing we DON'T)" Perhaps you missed it the last four or five times? the reason is simple & legit! *****PLEASE READ & UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING REASONS ROBERT WAS BANNED FROM A SITE***** For the record. you obviously read Bruce's blog where I stated you were not welcome on my forum. I don't recall stating you were not allowed to VIEW it. then two days after the start of the forum you registered under the name DungeonsWizard. 10 days later you revealed who you really were. you were BANNED from the forum. this included your IP, just like it's done here! so, what did you do? you jumped on hidemyass.com and started taking screenshots (illegally) of a poster talking about you. absolutely nothing was said about you until your little stunt was performed. that's why you were BANNED, and that's why you can no longer VIEW it easily. you also agreed to the rules when you registered. You did this. not me! you whine that you can't see it. then you turn around and laugh and say you can view anytime you wish. stop whining about it. you are BANNED from the site. period! I DON'T TRUST YOU....so we are even "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"Late Edit for Shutter: You understand of course that because you decided to block AB's office computers from viewing your site, (not POSTING, but just VIEWING) that some people might wonder why. Are you really so afraid of what we might see?" ???? must we go through this again Robert? Flip flop thingy again. I thought you could view it anytime you wish? When you are BANNED from a forum, several things happen. here ONCE again is why Robert M Blevins was BANNED & BLOCKED FROM viewing my forum. *****PLEASE READ & UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING REASONS ROBERT WAS BANNED FROM A SITE***** For the record. you obviously read Bruce's blog where I stated you were not welcome on my forum. I don't recall stating you were not allowed to VIEW it. then two days after the start of the forum you registered under the name DungeonsWizard. 10 days later you revealed who you really were. you were BANNED from the forum. this included your IP, just like it's done here! so, what did you do? you jumped on hidemyass.com and started taking screenshots (illegally) of a poster talking about you. absolutely nothing was said about you until your little stunt was performed. that's why you were BANNED, and that's why you can no longer VIEW it easily. you also agreed to the rules when you registered (see photo) So, what is it you are whining about in general? it's all the fault of Robert M Blevins. it's kind of hard for you to slant, or skew the reasons Robert! blame nobody but yourself. you are not welcome on that forum. perhaps you understand now? I can provide a video if needed, or raise the volume for the hearing impaired? This is what? the third, or fourth time explaining this Robert! get a grip dude. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"The general opinion around here is you just haven't figured out the Information Age yet for what it actually is, and how it works. The only real loser here is YOU and YOUR site. We can look at it whenever we wish...or force you to block out millions of people at the same time in your efforts to prevent one single person from looking. Have we got the power over you or what? I would say yes. But you allow us this power." That's funny, I don't recall seeing your articles anywhere with the known Cooper sites? keep your audience. I don't want them Robert. Show the power Robert. I would like to see people in the Cooper community speak of you, and I'm not talking about here. Is this more of your "I'm not trying to discredit the site" The number one whiner in the United States: "without us even having the ability to view comments there on that information?" "We can look at it whenever we wish"...the flip flop thingy again you have probably said this 4 or 5 times, but I'm not going to look for all of them. "It's not YOUR investigation, but OURS." You think you own a investigation into a Federal crime? seriously? I hate to tell you but you can't really own an investigation. this proves once again how you are trying to control the TRUTH. sound the alarm! tell all people are coming to ask questions Robert screams! you would screenshot someone saying something like that about there story. You keep failing to understand the forum is not designed for millions of viewers. I'm not in the numbers game Robert. that's your life. it will grow over time I'm sure. the main goal has been reached. If some sort of super Cooper evidence should arise. it will be given to the right people. it's another avenue for researching things about Cooper. now, if you were Gray, perhaps I would be in a bit of trouble, because his word gets out to the public, and the media uses him for information. so, again, you can have your viewers Robert. I'll be on the edge of my seat waiting for another deceptive Christiansen power witness that nobody will have access to in your CENSORED investigation. you learned a lot from Bob Knoss. ADDED: Now, since you are a numbers kinda guy. I just went to my site. a record has been broken, oh no! the most online at one time was 17 back in March. 38 are currently online viewing the forum. "Most Online Today: 38. Most Online Ever: 38 (Today at 07:12:55 AM) you better get a crack'n Bobby! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

I keep telling you....I don't need you, I don't need your permission for anything. the Knoss story growing is all to familiar. so, rattle on with the new big findings. Documents don't lie, people do. Have 3 or 4 laughs. why don't we just link the sites. it will save you a lot of time? You have a problem with Georger. take it up with him. I have nothing to do with what goes on between you guys. If Kitt said those things, what will happen? nothing. if he burned a bridge to prove something. so be it. You make mountains out of molehills. very similar to the KC saga. I'll tell you what I tell Knoss. prove it! all I've seen is misinformation, incorrect documents, false statements. speculation to the max. Bernie is a liar according to Robert, Decoded says, I believe him? ya, the FBI wants a piece of this chicken (*laughs*) The biggest hurdle for ya is Tina. remember? she had to look up at Cooper. isn't Tina 5'8"...isn't Kenny 5' 8" He is not a viable suspect.....Ayn Dietrich FBI. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Larry Carr FBI ..reference to Lyle Christiansen. She insists all the suspects still being touted by Cooper sleuths have been ruled out — either because they don't match the DNA or fingerprints they have on file, or because the descriptions just don't match up. So are we now close to finally having a real suspect in the decades-old case? reference to Marla... Now, see the bold letters FBI? isn't that the very same people you claim that know where Cooper jumped, and where the plane was? why is that correct, and the above not? isn't these the same smart guys you speak so highly of, or until Kenny is brought up? or anything that could relate to it? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Can we expect a screenplay? Looking forward to it. I hope he is willing to speak to the media, and LEO. you know, that pesky trust thingy..... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"There is no use in discussing this any further. Each has their own side to this story" No Robert, there will only be the truth remaining. that's how it's done. I will continue to to discuss it, and I will investigate it. that's what these forums are suppose to be used for, to discuss evidence, analyze, and research any given topic. you don't like it? tough. you can't have it one way. You had no problem looking into Marla's story, the same now goes for the KC saga. when I see problems in a story. I check it out for validation. once it's all been checked out, and properly researched. I will show my findings just as you did. it's no different, except the proper documents to backup what has been said will be included. When you have documents incorrectly reported, stories that turn out to be untrue, and other possibilities why someone has money. it needs to be added to the story. it seems some have been purposely left out. you can't just make things look good. especially when you are accusing the living of a Federal offense. all four corners of the box needs to be checked. you seem to be missing several corners to most of the conclusions. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Shutter: I have read your comments back there. It's amusing to see you complaining about me 'no longer answering questions on Kenny' when you're the same guy who decided to block our office computers from even VIEWING your website. Yet...you jump over here to Dropzone at will, commenting on my posts HERE. The last one wasn't even directed at you, but Robert99. Are you like his lawyer or something? Smile It's your right to post wherever you wish, of course. And it's OUR right to make decisions regarding the release of information. Do you believe we're stupid enough to provide you with information that you would simply take over to YOUR website and discuss, without us even having the ability to view comments there on that information? Man...you must really think we're dumb. So the decision was made to freeze all outgoing information on Christiansen until we come to a conclusion about him. Hell, if I started dropping names and providing updates, it wouldn't be long before some of your users would be confronting people on their doorsteps or emailing them trash. Or calling them and whatever. It's not YOUR investigation, but OURS. You and your users do not deserve to either have the opportunity to trash us without repercussions, or start playing Twilight Zone 'Four o' Clock' with folks we've worked hard to earn trust with. And why are you blocked from viewing that forum Mr. twisty? perhaps you joined under a phony name, and then after a simple block you used a proxy blocker illegally to get around the block. yes I remember well. months ago you were laughing and stating you can't stop me from VIEWING that site, and yet you continue to whine about something that was your FAULT. what are you doing with other forums discussing KC? how can you control where and who can discuss it? Trust you? you flip flop through just about everything you say. including not discussing KC. "Sorry...wrong number. No more discussion by me about KC on public forums. See you the second Saturday of August, and then I'm out of the Cooper biz." Now, you claim you are "freezing" information. several days ago the excuse was addresses? flip flop. To date, I don't believe anyone has emailed, or contacted any of the people on your list. what I don't understand is the fact of trying to hide information that is about a Federal crime. these people have chosen to speak about it only to you. that's a problem. being open about other possibilities is part of the deal. what are you scared of? For the record. who found the known problems with the KC saga? you know, the ones you admit to? you want the truth, but whine that we are not trust worthy? again, who found the problems? you would think you would continue to allow things to surface if the truth was the true intention here. For the record. you obviously read Bruce's blog where I stated you were not welcome on my forum. I don't recall stating you were not allowed to VIEW it. then two days after the start of the forum you registered under the name DungeonsWizard. 10 days later you revealed who you really were. you were BANNED from the forum. this included your IP, just like it's done here! so, what did you do? you jumped on hidemyass.com and started taking screenshots (illegally) of a poster talking about you. absolutely nothing was said about you until your little stunt was performed. that's why you were BANNED, and that's why you can no longer VIEW it easily. you also agreed to the rules when you registered (see photo) So, what is it you are whining about in general? it's all the fault of Robert M Blevins. it's kind of hard for you to slant, or skew the reasons Robert! blame nobody but yourself. you are not welcome on that forum. perhaps you understand now? I can provide a video if needed, or raise the volume for the hearing impaired? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Just saying.

Seventh who are you kidding? the FBI has dismissed KC years ago. "He is not a viable suspect" Tina had to look up at Cooper. you don't really believe that she was wrong do you? Tina 5' 8"..KC 5' 8" Many of your so called witnesses are proving to be not creditable! in your words LIARS. The very television show you push believes Bernie Geestman was NOT the accomplice in the Cooper case. Oops. are you kidding me? you really expect the FBI to believe all the misinformation you keep trying to send them? the FBI doesn't like revisions. the PDF first edition, the PDF second edition? you say, follow the money trail? I did, and it failed. It's funny how the FBI keeps stating they THINK they know where Cooper landed, and show what they believe is the known flight path. Quotes from the FBI regarding Kenny Christiansen: "he's not a viable suspect" FBI spokeswoman Robbie Burroughs. "all the suspects still being touted by Cooper sleuths have been ruled out" "I'm sure he absolutely believes his brother is D.B. Cooper," said Larry Carr, who has been the lead investigator on the case for just over a year. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" "If you make serious posts (as Jo says) over at the alternate site, then why do you care what she says at Dropzone?" Why do you care what is, or isn't said "over there" "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Yes, I categorize him with Bob Knoss now. Knoss quickly comes up with new angles that can't be verified, or even checked. this allows time for the refueling plane to line up and dump lbs of fuel to last for miles. he fails to see, or understand that I can verify things without his help. it's all good... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

"In Other News: Too bad some of you support hanging out at a website that likes to pick and choose who can view posts on Cooper. Not post, but just VIEW. Brother, I just love censorship. Really gets my blood going and makes me think of the Wasilla Library and Sarah Palin." Blocking ROBERT M BLEVINS from my forum is not censorship. you have proven over and over why it happened. look back on this very forum and you can clearly see reason. lets not forget you signed up days after the forum started, but didn't post under your false name until 10 days after the start of the forum. reason? you read on Bruce's blog that you were not welcome. I see since nobody is posting, you wish to keep stirring up trouble with deceptive posts. you have nothing better to do other than whine about others. Whether you realize it or not. this very forum also picks and chooses who can post & view the forum. it's a behavior thingy. they also block IP's. haven't you found this out being BANNED many times? Snow was a very important part in researching Cooper, but was banned from here for reasons according to 377 much less than others. You have been banned and blocked for multiple reasons. 1) You would constantly tie up the thread with conflicts. 2) You would advertise constantly. 3) You signed up under an alias 2 days after the start of the forum. February 26, 2014. forum started the 24th. 4) You posted identifying yourself March 5, 2014. (most already had known) even advertising! (see reason two) 5) You were taking screenshots illegally after your BAN. The original reason is enough, and is my right. it has nothing to do with censorship. you WHINED in the past that nobody would see anything about KC on my forum. then you find out differently and start WHINING you can't see, or post on the forum. you flip flop constantly on topics. this is all the fault of one Robert M Blevins, and nobody else. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

It's strange that we now question things, and all of the sudden new parts are adding to the story that hasn't changed for years...probably more people who "disappeared", or claim everything is true without backing anything up except the word of the alleged person. they call them "reruns" on television. same old tune. Well, I'm willing to wait and see what Robert comes up with. However, if it's just someone who "corroborates" the other witnesses, that doesn't really help because none of the witnesses were willing to say Kenny was the hijacker. Now, if this new witness can actually put Kenny on the plane, then I trust this information will be forwarded to the FBI. Sure, bring it on. I'm game to change up the pace. the old stuff is tarnished. time for new material. kinda like a refueling stage. keep in mind that if any of it had any value, the FBI should be the ones knowing about it first hand. none of them seem to want to go straight to them for answers. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

It's strange that we now question things, and all of the sudden new parts are adding to the story that hasn't changed for years...probably more people who "disappeared", or claim everything is true without backing anything up except the word of the alleged person. they call them "reruns" on television. same old tune. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

Robert, I told you I don't need to see the new PDF. You sound similar to other people with suspects. you try and put suspense in it as if it's a game. you still don't want to do the right thing and take it directly to the FBI if it was red hot evidence. I've never "attacked" you Robert. you continue to use excuse after excuse about this matter. people are asking questions NOT because they think it's possible Kenny is Cooper. they seem to be asking questions because things are not adding up. what has changed here in the last two months? I'll answer that. things have been found in regards to people who know Kenny, to evidence about the case being inaccurate. You wish to change the description of Cooper based on what probably one passenger said? ok, lets do it. Now, since you put Kenny in the equation we need to drop it down like the FBI has done. Cooper can now be 5' 6" all the way to 6'. you can't just say Cooper was 5' 8". the FBI took there statements into consideration, but based it on direct contact. you will never get passed the fact that Tina had to look up at Cooper unless you come up with a story like Paul's. he claimed some sort of spring loaded boots making him reach the height requirements. If i'm not mistaken Kenny was 150 lbs? I agree with the FBI. this has nothing to do with your personal behavior Robert. Kenny doesn't fit the profile. Kenny doesn't fit the description. Cooper supposedly had a grudge, and not against the airline. this is another problem. you can speculate all you want. the facts don't line up. you are trying to defend something you had absolutely nothing to do with. you should be cooperating 100% allowing things to be researched, and proven, or found not to be true. you would quickly be labeled a hostile witness if you played this game in court. Kenny seems to be a typical everyday guy who complained about his job. he was there far too long to compare it to a grudge over ordinary complaining. actually, you would label Kenny a whiner! obviously we still have several problems here. the FBI claims Kenny is not viable suspect, the witnesses are failing to come forward on there own. the story has been around long enough for the passengers, and crew to positively ID Kenny. then you have problems with the story, and evidence falling apart. the FBI has your book, the PDF, and has acknowledged Kenny as a suspect at one point, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. the truth will surface with, or without you Robert. Good luck. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

If you got DSL through Bell South. I would kill the phone service, and get majic jack. you can hook the same home phone up to it. talk long distance, $20 a year, a year Jo. you talked to me plenty of times on it. I didn't renew it this year,so it's dormant now. it works pretty damn good for the cheap cost. I think the cost went up a little, but you have no monthly bills, only yearly. it drops calls every once in a while like cell phones, but you can't beat it. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI

You have to do something about your internet Jo. I'm paying $40 a month total with Bell south. some of your emails might still be hung up sending, and you shut the computer off. I had that problem with dial up. that was years ago, I remember the tones while connecting, it would lose connection if someone called....those days are long gone. have you checked to see if someone has wireless around you? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI