mrshutter45

Members
  • Content

    3,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by mrshutter45

  1. Robert, you came on my forum under a false name, regardless of your intentions. you got what you deserved. freedom of choice is what I go by. my choice was not having you on the forum. in return with your VINDICTIVE behavior you sign up trying to prove a point. Yes, we are discussing Kenny "over there." nobody is bashing anyone. you don't want to talk about Kenny anyway remember! you don't want to answer questions here, so stop whining it's being discussed anywhere else Robert. a month ago you were whining that if someone came on the forum they wouldn't see anything about KC. The KC questions asked by me were justified. you answered some of them admitting fault. KC has been discussed by you whether you, or anyone else brought it up since you have been here. it was fine until things started shifting. actually it was the opposite. people were telling you to stop. now, you cry when people ask questions! "You keep MISSING the main point of the PDF. It doesn't exist to PROVE Ken Christiansen was Cooper. It exists to help others discover the truth." That's exactly right Robert, but how can it be right if you have it wrong! now since it was proven wrong you shut out the people that proved it wrong claiming slanted views. that's baloney! look up hypocrite please. Just like any store you walk into has the right to refuse service, period. as mentioned above I did just that with not allowing you on my forum. you went further with your spiteful, childish, vindictive behavior and pulled your little stunt proving yet another justifiable reason for your banning! you pull the samething on Amazon fighting with people. then because you say the guy doesn't like you he is quickly labeled a sock puppet, but the majority found his comments helpful. a rather large majority. Now, whether you like it or not KC is part of the DB Cooper story, and the following problems were found, and you the author has admitted to many of them. 1) The house was not purchased in cash. 2) Carolyn Powell has been proven not credible. 3) Dawn J Androsko has not been proven credible with either the loan, or how she claims a lot of personal details from someone she barely had known. 4) Property documents have been labeled incorrectly, even stating they were purchased for $10. 5) No documentation has ever been presented showing the value of a alleged stamp/coin collection ranging in prices from $400k down to $30k. typo? I think not. 6) Decoded claimed Bernie Geestman of not being the accomplice in the DB Cooper case. although they think KC might be Cooper, but this was prior to the incorrect information given to them. if you take out Bernie, the boat sinks. period. 7) I believe Carolyn Powell made up the story about the money on the property. she has been found not credible. this could explain why there are two stories about the money in two different decades! These are rather large error's & problems wouldn't you say? now, refuse all you want about discussing KC on a discussion forum Robert! take the 5th I don't care. whether you like it or not. these are legit questions that raise problems with this story. running from them, or hiding from them won't make it go away. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  2. Seriously Robert, that's how you sum the whole thing up? you are speaking about Bruce Smith correct? the one who still posts here? You obviously can't handle the heat. people are asking questions about Kenny. I don't see anyone attacking you. the problem with you and Georger goes back years. Bruce is still here, so I guess you guys also allow it, no? Last time I checked I was seeking the truth. took several pages for you to admit some of it. you once again have no problem calling people names, but certainly can't handle any criticism going your way. when you start to lose control you start personal attacks. don't say your not either, just read above. you are blocking the public from viewing anything about KC you think is big news, and using us to try and justify it. do you remember what this forum is used for? to discuss DB Cooper. you don't want to include your own work here, then why are you here? perhaps the thread should be shut down so the media can figure it out? if you can do it, why can't everyone else? I find it odd that you hang out on a forum where you don't trust anyone, you won't submit anything, nobody has every come on here to back your story other than you telling us about all about the emails, the phone calls etc. oh, wait. Paul had your back. he was very spiteful, and vindictive just like you. what are the odds. you have some issues dude. seriously. and what loop exactly are we cut from, the KC loop? where everything is based on a couple people, several have been under fire for a while. one recently has been labeled a liar. Dawn A. didn't know KC very well but has all kinds of personal information she claims to have by her admission, not from someone else. fire in the hole..... Perhaps things will get back to Cooper August 10, 2014 Vindictive: having or showing a strong or unreasoning desire for revenge. Perhaps you should look into the paranormal world. they have tons your type there. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  3. Robert, you wish to believe people are picking on you, that's simply not the case. seems to me that you are picking on Bernie Geestman. you don't have anything that ties him to the crime. people claiming things is only a start to implicating them into a crime. the evidence doesn't support. frankly, it's falling apart. So, who is slanted in the Cooper case? just anybody, none from this, or any other forum questioning the story of Kenny Christiansen being DB Cooper? has it ever occurred to you that trust is a two way street. especially when people give out incorrect information to reporters, and law enforcement! concealing the witnesses personal information is rather easy. you simply state all the contact information will be in a separate form. the names have been known for some time now. even you state it's easy by just dropping a few bucks on a site to get the information. Yes, I believe you are correct by stating the FBI won't do anything. you really think they will listen to someone who sent them inaccurate information in the first place? why bother it was minor error's remember? they have your book, the original PDF, and probably seen Decoded, and nothing. the answer once again has already been given. now you feel with newborn information about KC, this could all be turned back around in your favor again? I don't believe it. As for Georger, as you say. it doesn't appear you were speaking in past tense. this is a pattern with you by stating one thing, and doing another. be it leaving this forum, to no longer viewing my forum, or anyone else like Greg. you like to speak a lot for many people. we never really hear from any of the people you speak about. If some of these people are so scared of the FBI. why is it not a problem telling the public, and the FBI about a story they seem scared to come forward about? or is it possible they don't know the extent you have went since the beginning? Lye Christiansen speaks of KC. "I have a secret, but I can tell you" Shutter I have a car for sale, but I'm not sell it?????? None of this story seems to make any sense when you look into it...... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  4. June 5, 2014 Shutter: Look, no one from AB is even checking your site anymore. I told Greg to forget it. I've said I hope you guys figure out something meaningful on the case. June 16, 2014 Greg checks out your posts over at the alternate site and sees the ones you make here. He says you post more or less 'normal' things over there, and trash HERE. I agree with that assessment as well. Should I use the L word here? Some of you ask why Robert get so much flak? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  5. You blast people screaming "censorship" for having a proxy blocker and post this on your website? We have removed the public version of a PDF report we created in 2012 on the evidence against Ken Christiansen. It has been replaced with an updated and enhanced version that runs more than fifty pages. This PDF is only available now to law enforcement or reporters whose credentials and bona-fides we certify first. This is done to protect the safety of certain witnesses, and to prevent harrassment by those who may have slanted agendas regarding the Cooper case. So now you are blocking the public on evidence about a DB Cooper suspect. again, what would you do if Marla did this? "Protect the safety of certain witnesses" you sure can dish it out when it comes to confronting someone else's evidence. how do you justify these people are in danger? protect there safety?? WOW........ Robert states: Censorship is easily seen for what it is. You want to pick and choose on what voices should be heard, that's up to you. Are you not picking and choosing here with the blocking of the PDF? Double WOW.... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  6. Robert, how can you claim "our views" are slanted? you are the one with inaccurate data. you don't trust anyone on here, but take the PDF down because of what we said, but we are slanted? I'm not "attacking you" I'm showing faults (big ones) in your story. you try and blame other people for your taking down the PDF....seriously? who was slanted in reporting the percentages of misidenifications? Here is another slanted thought since you believe that. we have now proven Carolyn Powell a liar (your words) Dawn J Androsko didn't know Kenny very well according to you. how is it (in a non slanted way) that she knows he was wearing a toupee prior to the crime, or remembers a tie clip from someone she had hardly known? in a non slanted way one would think the tie clip would have to be worn almost daily in order to remember it 40 plus years later. she doesn't remember a black tie, but remembers the clip, even though we have a picture of Kenny wearing a black tie, and a tie bar, not a tie clip? no pictures of him wearing a toupee. you would blast the hell out of Marla for lack of proof. It's basically down to a family screaming out KC was Cooper. you don't even include his brother in hardly any of this? you have an ex-wife scared of her past husband (Bernie) that could easily play out as spite to one another. the possibilities of a story created from these two are pretty high. you like to use Decoded as a good source, but fail to notice at the end they agreed with Bernie, buddy even goes on to say he wasn't the accomplice. so, in a non slanted way, if you take away Bernie. what do you have now? does Decoded know about the house not being bought in cash, or the property documents you have wrong, or the now excluded story of money found on the property that Carolyn stated that can no longer be credible due to her being a liar. Now, speaking of slanted. how is ok for you to rip apart Cossey, call him a liar, rip apart Marla's story, and call her a liar, and turn around stating people are slanted in views of your story? ......Really? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  7. "About the only real evidence I've downplayed is the witness description by the FBI. Witness descriptions, especially when the witnesses are under duress, are often just plain inaccurate. 75% of wrongful convictions are due to this concept." Those are different circumstances. the average crime lasts seconds. the witnesses don't get hours to look at the suspect. the proof is right in front of you. Tina & Flo had similar descriptions. the passengers who didn't have a reason to look at him were all over the board. If you went to the store today, who was in there, and what were they wearing? now if you seen a robbery in progress and got caught up in it being taken hostage for several hours. what do you think your description will be from the guy who seen it happen, but ran out fast enough to get away? From what I'm reading you got that from the DNA cases that were overturned. I don't think it's directed at anything other than the DNA cases. "Eyewitness misidentification, which was a factor in more than 75% of all wrongful convictions overturned by DNA testing nationwide," "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  8. I can't speak for others Robert, but I'm not stating the map is phony. I believe human error could easily be a factor here. you need to stop thinking everything is a lie. I think it's possible they got it wrong, it's as simple as that. they could also have the map right and the timing wrong. we don't have enough proof to support anything. sure it's possible Cooper landed where they said, and he lived out his life. I haven't seen anything convince me of that what so ever. the files are full of stories just like yours. tons of circumstantial evidence on dozens of KC's, Webers, Coopers etc. The FBI clearly states and shows a map stating what "the believed flight path was." that's not very convincing in my opinion. I think it's time for the FBI to admit defeat and either turn it over to the Marshals office, or open the case up to the public. it's nonsense to hold anything back at this stage. Carr should have just opened it up, more that he allowed. if were not looking in the right place, as the FBI has now claimed, how can we decide he made it? a corner is missing out of the square. show me all four corners, and then we can discuss Cooper surviving. October 4, 1971 the FBI open fired on a hijacked plane that caused the killing of everyone on board. the son of the pilot killed is on my forum. perhaps there was a little confusion going on trying to figure out what to do in the Cooper case. this was fresh on the minds of the FBI I'm sure. the FBI appears to make mistakes. big ones. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jIV2LjKSQA "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  9. Robert, of course people are going to check on it. some will read and take it as face value, but that's not the issue. the issue is having a report accurate as possible. we have spent months trying to convince of this. you want to try and prove KC was Cooper, I don't have a problem with that. we all would like to find out who Cooper really was, or possibly is.that's the bottom line to any forum out there. I don't run people in the ground claiming to have another option to the case. I let them present there story, and go from there. I'll admit I'm curious as to what Rataczak will say this time. the path is an important part of the whole Cooper story. surely you can't believe that in today's world a Boeing 777 could simply disappear could ya? so how is it they could track a 727 with accuracy in 1971? now, granted they were on top of what occurred with 305 vs flight 370, but it gives reason that we are not as perfect as we claim. human error is the number one factor here. they are claiming different things about the path. Carr admits it's the best known flight path, never stating this is exactly where they were at any given time. so, just as any other part of the Cooper story, we don't have any real validation claiming exactly where the plane was when Cooper jumped. I can tell you this after flying it over, and over on the simulator. you can basically move the path to the east and still get the same results by moving at the point of passing Toledo, or the 7:59 mark. basically I can conclude, so far, the path is flyable in the time frame reported. is this solid proof, nope, but it's a stepping stone into validating something. I take offense when people claim I'm trying to move the path. I'm trying to resolve the path, justify it, prove it right, or possibly wrong. try flying a 727 by yourself, it's not easy. even on the simulator. the sim is extremely accurate in altitudes, speeds, and even has just about every road in it. I can drive a car to my house using it. the functions on the plane all work. that's why it's hard for me, no co-pilot, or navigator, just old shutter sitting in a homemade cockpit trying to put a little truth in this mess. ask Mark Bennett, he found out quickly it's not easy to jump in and fly a plane. sadly I'm still seeing debris on the ground as a constant reminder of his skills sorry Mark, had to say it "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  10. Robert, I don't have a problem what so ever in looking for truth. when you try and deny it, or cover it up. that becomes a problem. when you don't want to look at other possible options you then fail in finding any truth. we have many options here Robert that lead to possible reasons. you keep them out for an obvious reason. that is the main problem people have with you. I'm not picking on Carolyn, I'm picking apart her story! that's how it's done, and that's how it was now finally revealed about Carolyn's testimony. it's not truthful, believable, accurate, honest, take your pick. basically we can strike her out on anything of value. I just don't believe the story Robert. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  11. so, she doesn't know much about kenny, but has all the information of his finances? do you see how the truth slowly pops out Robert. we now go from didn't know much about Kenny, to trying to prove Kenny was Cooper based on verified witness testimony as you state it? she also claims two other lots Robert. did you tell the FBI this in your report? that's a huge hole in your theory Bobby. the witnesses are falling apart one by one. last time I checked, she TESTIFIED to these statements. I don't think the main point was anything but Kenny's finances. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  12. Beep, Beep, Beep.....sound of backing up "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  13. Carolyn Powell was not living with Christiansen when he purchased his house. Her 'attempted murder' allegation refers to her ex-husband Robin's assault on his own mother. She called it 'attempted murder,' the cops say assault. Six of one, a half dozen of the other. Robin also put Carolyn into the hospital more than once. Robert, those are false claims, you can't put words into her mouth about what she has said. assault, and attempted murder are two different things Robert. it doesn't matter if she was living with him or not. she claims in your report that Kenny purchased his house for cash. you can't dodge around what she said Robert. it's clearly reported as so. she also claims a purchase of cash for the "adjoining lot". They charged Robin several times with different degrees of assault. nothing about attempted murder. she has exaggerated the story. I'm sorry that happened to her, but they charged him with assault only! 6) She testified that Christiansen not only purchased the house in Bonney Lake and the adjoining lot for cash, but also a large wooded lot behind what is now the Bonney Lake Safeway. Tyner added that Christiansen told her he bought this wooded lot after he bought the house. how sure are you of the lot behind the safeway? did you look at all the records? 7) After Christiansen’s death, she and her husband received the house, but sold it shortly after probate cleared. They then moved to Nevada, and Carolyn divorced him. She also stated that her ex-husband Robin Powell was once charged with attempted murder on his own mother, and when he drinks he sometimes becomes violent. ‘He put me into the hospital more than once,’ she says. That is clearly exaggerated statements......and false ones at that! records indicate they owned the house until I believe 1999. I'll have to check the records again. you are stating they flipped the house. you have a bunch of deceptive, criminal, and violent people you are trying to back up here. do you realize this? you can't trust what this clan is stating. the FBI seems to agree as well. you have to be charged with attempted murder in order to state it as a fact! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  14. Yes, lets look at theories shall we? KC came about through Lyle Christensen, a person he doesn't trust. then we have people in this circle who have stories confirmed not to be true. Carolyn Powell is not being honest in her statement about the purchase of the house. she goes on to claim her husband was arrested for attempted murder. this is also incorrect. a $5,000 loan was given to a woman who hardly knew the person in which the large sum of money was given. records were never researched to prove any of this other than family members speaking out. then you have improper pieces of evidence about property being incorrectly stated in a report none the less given to the FBI. From the start it appears Lyle's intentions of making a movie about his story seems to have moved ahead of proving KC had anything to do with the crime. he actually paid hundreds of dollars to get a letter to a producer, rather than spending it on trying to prove he was Cooper. now, a full circle seems to have occurred by Mr. Blevins also jumping on the movie wagon, way ahead of proving anything other than pure speculation surround KC. every single website you look at constantly repeats that Kenny purchased his home for cash, but now it's not really part of the story? when you start chipping away at a story that seems to show some positive outlooks on a suspect slowly start to dissolve, you are left with a bunch of people claiming squat. the substance is also slowly being removed. we have a single mother who obviously had a rather larger salary decided to get a loan from someone she barely knew, went around bank loans, and paid it back with a much larger monthly installment? if she was that well off. why did she need a loan in the first place? and just like the rest of us, Dawn has records. they indicate a lot of bank transactions with property. I heard so many different stories about a stamp/coin collection that has never surfaced in any form other than once again, people stating this. same for the money find on the property. Robert even claims a newspaper was used to ask about the loan, but once again no verification to that has ever surfaced. two different stories revolve around this as well. Robert claims descriptions can be off, but doesn't have a problem with putting KC photo right next to the sketch? then uses passengers descriptions to help in his height issue. those people have different views for the simple reason that they didn't have reasons to remember him. Tina was standing right next to him having to look up at Cooper. this very hard to dispute. this is no different than what Marla has claimed. her story is full of holes as well. she has a book, she wanted to be in a movie about her uncle being Cooper. a pattern between the two are clearly seen. what this theory boils down to, and clearly shows by what has been stated is a lot of exaggeration going on. nothing more. none of them, except Lyle has tried to contact the authorities on one of the greatest mysteries in this country. who could sit on that? Robert doesn't seem to have a problem speaking for them though! if they didn't wish to get involved, they should have kept there mouths shut, like they were doing prior to this whole movie/book deal came about! How about that theory!!! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  15. "You do know what is going on in the state of FL right now? Then do NOT play dumb about medical Drs. opting out if a search pulls anything negative about a patient." Jo, are you telling me that doctors are refusing medical attention by taking someone's word on the internet? do you really think that's legal? that's refusing your freedom of speech rights Jo. do they read the National Enquirer and decide not to treat some celebrities? that whole paper is full of lies. How, and when did the doctor find my forum. it's still hard to find doing a search. it's takes a while before it starts really showing up. odds are very high nothing was found by any doctor. I've only spoken a couple times to snow thru PM's. again, I could pull the censorship card by stating he's not allowed to post. this forum is not allowing everyone involved with the case to speak, as Robert once said in reference to his BAN. 377 has pleaded many times for his return, but it hasn't happened. even stating others have done worse. so, once again people are not really stating the truth about things here either are they? I typed your name in on the internet. nothing surfaced in regards to my forum. this one pops up a lot with your name attached. it's very easy to link you from being here, but zip on anything about me, or my forum. I'm sure there are things said about you and Robert that you have no idea about that are on the internet that you haven't found, or about me, or anyone else for that matter. I'm reminded of an episode on the Andy Griffith Show where Gomer does a u-turn, and Barney gives him a ticket. Barney leaves and does a u-turn himself causing Gomer to scream Citizens arrest, citizens arrest! Robert also danced right around Carolyn being labeled a liar on a document that was sent to the FBI, or the fact of him censoring his video's by not allowing the public to comment on them. you and Robert constantly say things negative that make people respond that ties the thread up for pages. you guys keep screaming in justice, when you fail to look in the mirror yourselves. seriously, what's worse, flooding the public with misinformation to the public, and the FBI in regards to a Federal crime, or whining about something said about them on a public forum? "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  16. JO Exclaims - You Shutter assured me NO one would see the things Cook worth. Jo, why would I say that? I'm sure I said something like nobody will read it, or believe it. something to that affect. Even WORSE: Did you know a medical test was DENIED due to what Cook Wrote in a public thread. are you trying to tell me that medical attention was refused due to someone stating something online. I don't believe that for a second Jo. what grounds could possibly be used for this action? Jo, horrible things have been said about you on this thread as well, but you have dished out a fair share yourself. a lot of us are guilty of that. I never claimed to be immune to it either. you guys are trying really hard to put a halo over this thread. look back oh, 75 pages. how many stay on track, and are Cooper related? over 2,000 pages. how many are worthy of reading? I could easily use Roberts tactics and say, the thread was locked down once because of so much anger and hatred going on. I can't recommend this site. they trash talk all the time, call each other liars. it's a hateful site. DB Cooper is rarely spoken about. they even kicked a Federal agent off the thread. Snowmman was banned, he has a high IQ, but they quickly censored him. he's important to the case but can't post because of the censorship going on over there. it's pathetic. would I post something like that? nope. I don't post any of this crap. it's not worth repeating anywhere. sadly I don't see anything remotely going on with discussing Cooper. until some changes are put in place, it will remain the way it is. 377 has tries to jump in a toss a few things around, but it quickly gets drowned out. it's sad. it really is. then once things start to move, Knoss pops in and locks the thread up with his lies. nobody removes those either! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  17. Robert, everyone has a ban capability. this site does the exact samething. I don't care what you caught. it's a forum where people talk. BS is said on here all the time. I don't believe anything was said about you until you popped on. you were blocked for repeated returns. Quade blocks IP's here as well. that's different right? it start as usual, the second you came through the door. and like a broken record you whine about it. how many people have asked for the thread to be shut down! You have incorrect data on a form to the public, regardless of how critical you think it is, or isn't. that is misleading. Carolyn is a liar as you like to put things. she claims Kenny bought the house for cash. that's a LIE. she also lied about her husbands criminal record. another lie. she's not credible (what a shock) What document do you think you have that reads "paid $10"? more misleading information. theories are looked at Robert, that's how things are done. we don't take the word of someone and run with it to the bank! just because someone speaks about a certain part of the crime, or even flight path does not mean it's being changed. you are misleading again in what you are reporting. who has agreed to this path? me, Georger, Hominid. speak up! you always tell half the story Robert! it's called a discussion. we don't spend pages arguing about things. differences occur just as they do anywhere you go on the planet. nobody, I repeat, nobody has moved the path. Robert99 has a theory. he also has the right to explain it. here is another lie of yours......remember you keep claiming your not trying to discredit the forum? "My recommendation goes to Dropzone for public discussions on the Cooper case." or perhaps the lies you told on your website that quickly vanished about my forum? you know, the ones you thought were not lies? I'd rather hear what Robert99 has to say instead of listening to you over and over talk about a guy too short to be Cooper, to bald to be Cooper. Verified by Tina stating she had to look up at Cooper. did you talk to Rat about that? or shouldn't you be whining the FBI has censored you and Kenneth Christensen because they refuse to put your little family in different rooms to find out if Kenny was Cooper. I just checked. you were BANNED on March 5, 2014. the thread where Cook talks about you was started March 13th his first comment was March 17th. if there was an "approved list" you would see that at registration. I don't have that option on. Quade seems to have changed his rules as well, because now he also blocks IP's. careful who you are slamming with this. why do you censor your video's on You Tube? you don't allow the public to respond publicly to them. you didn't even use the waiting for approval option on You Tube. you plain shut out the public from responding. your answer, to keep Cooper nuts out? similar to what I did to you? how do you say it "double standard" You just can't accept the fact of being perma banned. so, you constantly whine about the forum. you still haven't proven Cook wrong, so stop whining about it. same thing he was doing, a bunch of talk, and no action. I asked him for proof as well. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  18. "Why is DO ANY OF you guys come to this thread? The other thread is NOT open to public viewing & they DISALLOWED the very reasons this thread became the place to go....." Jo, that is absolutely false. there is nothing stopping the public from viewing that forum, zero. the proxy block has been off for some time now. the site has a .com, along with Googlebots, bingbots etc. constantly crawling the site. there is a proxy blocker on the registration. lots of spambots try and access the sites just like this one. Facts seem to always be an issue here, or the lack of them. try and get the facts straight before you try and claim something. how many times have you said you can't access the site, and turn around stating you can. seems to be more human error than anything. your browser is out of date. this costs is zero to upgrade. if you are having issues with that, it's the dial up. Cooper doesn't seem to exist here. I don't run this site. I don't know what to tell you, but I think the problems are obvious...... If you are trying to register again, that's not going to work because you are already registered. I didn't reset your password because the next day you said you could see the forum. you guys really need to give this Public BS a break. For the record. you posted on the forum once. I told you I had to discuss it with Bruce. he was very strong in your removal. some others posted and agreed. if you and Bruce can settle your differences, perhaps things will change. I offered you a separate section months ago, nothing was said. I can't do anything more Jo. this was the same time Bruce was put on vacation from here. tempers were still flaring, I wasn't about to let you and him continue battling on the new site. I don't think you guys will ever cease fire. I think I've been rather fair with you Jo. I've sent you parts of the thread when you couldn't figure things out, or couldn't see it. I stopped anyone from saying things out of line. I've discussed things with you many times through emails, on and off subject. If I lived close enough to you, I would have fixed all your computer problems, and charged zip. that's what kind of a guy I am Jo. regardless of what people try and make out of me! speaking of emails. my father died last November, so I doubt I'm who you thought I might be. I never answered that one. I'm just an average Joe, Jo! a guy who thought the case was interesting and dove into it. I found out that it's not that easy, so I made my own site. now you and Blevins want to continue to bash it by claiming things that are not true. the site is not closed to the public. it never was. it was on a free server that doesn't get pickup by Google. it was placed there as a test to see if enough interest was there. unfortunately the site was filling up quickly. I had no choice but to pay the money and get the domain earlier than expected. so, scream all you want about censorship. it total BS. the blocker was put there for two reason, first it was because of Blevins. soon after when I took it down periodically, spammers would attack. so it went back up until I found a better block, as mentioned many times. End Message..... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  19. "I feel sorry for Shutter. Perfectly nice website working on the case. (I forgave the early-on bit regarding Galen Cook's BS there.) And he put you on the 'allowed' list there. But you're an embarrassment here for him." Robert, there is no "allowed" list. you were removed from the other site. we all know the reason. isn't this site the same? it also (according to you) has a "allowed" list. seems the list of people not "allowed" on this site is much larger. this is the DB Cooper thread. how many pages back can this be found? what you are claiming here is no different than what you were going to do with your slide show. you know, have an "allowed" list to view it. Bruce brought up something about Gray, and I also made a similar remark that it could be possible that Gray said something to both of you, but as usual you go directly to using the word LIE without considering other options. you don't seem to like other options. they don't fit in to what you claim. it's harder for Georger to prove because it was a phone call. you keep dancing around claiming an email that you never show. so basically no proof once again on either side. just like you & Cook. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  20. If you can include a child and three people who weren't born at the time as witnesses, maybe Bruce's time traveling psychic stuff isn't so unreasonable after all! Do you know how your parents got their first house as a family? I do, regarding mine. And so do those folks. It's a Family Affair. The Androsko family now knows everything we do regarding the loan and Bernie Geestman's participation in it, as well as the evidence against Christiansen. This is what they say: Bernie is a liar and a crook, and they believe he was involved in the hijacking. This family has been comparing notes, you know. Robert, Honestly, I can believe you're actually saying this. Dawn's daughter was likely too young to know the details of any such loan. Dawn's daughter's source for the information is Dawn. Her grandchildren's source is also Dawn. You count those as five people cooborating a story, but that's really only one person. And, Shutter is right. $5,000 IS a lot of money. It's worth $25,000 today. That story really raises eyebrows. Someone she didn't know offers to lend Dawn the equivalent of $25,000? There has to be more to that story. And, how did she pay it back in two years? Other than a refi, I don't see how she does it. I'm not saying that it didn't happen, just that you should have treated it with a little more skepticsm and did some of the research that Shutter suggested. I mean seriously, how much money was she making? and why wouldn't she go to a bank. this is an extra $200 a month! that's a heavy amount for 1972. seems she would be the one loaning the $5k so Kenny (the poor guy) could buy his house. that's more convincing than anything stated about the loan. A single woman who seemingly doesn't have a pot to piss in ask's for a loan, a rather large one to purchase a home in which she didn't have the means to put a down payment on was able to add an extra $200 a month to pay it off.....really? yes, the FBI must be idiots for not looking into these verified claims.. that's over a grand a month today!!!! "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  21. "After the loans were paid back - the paper work was NOT kept. Never mounted to more than a few words on some stationary." Jo, loaning someone $5,000 in 1972 is a lot of money! the first thing that should have been done was checking to validate a home was purchased by checking the records to indicate a house was purchased in that time frame. then you try and validate $5,000 was used for the down payment. then you might want to ask the person who received the loan to try and justify how it was paid back. that's how you verify things. if you fail to do this you can't call things verified. the pain staking ground work comes with the job. if you don't want to do it, you should of never got involved in it. how much was that person making a year should also be addressed. if they fail to answer things above there credibility come under fire. it's almost saying she had two mortgages. the house also needs to been verified if it was paid for in a short period of time since she was wiping out debts easily. she must of been paid extremely well to handle these payments. well enough to where a loan shouldn't of been needed. I know plenty of people that have amounts like this that could be loaned out. doing it is another question...... the greatest hurdle that can't be disclaimed is the fact of Tina having to look up at Cooper. she would of been eye to eye with KC both being the same in height. that's VERIFIED. "He is not a viable suspect".......end message "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  22. Robert, your like a broken record. you can't face the truth. first of all. nobody has PROVEN what Cook said one way or the other! you keep stating things, but that's just words. the same as Cook! just more whining. The comments from the FBI go into 2011. that was just before they announced Marla's story. you know. the woman who has perfect memory like your gang. the woman who wrote a book like you did. the woman who has a questionable story, just like "yours truly!" (*laughs*) You don't have any proof of anything. it's a bunch of talk. that's all it is, and conflicting at that! you live right there where the FBI's office is. funny how you don't just walk in and check and confirm the PDF was looked over? for someone that wants the truth dodges the final stage. This was also said during your involvement. "Being an open but not active case, we respond to every report or lead. Our case agent will check them out and determine whether they're credible. We're not out there combing for more evidence but we've kept it open in the belief that there could be something out there. The money has surfaced before and perhaps more will surface." Just because people don't like the tactics you use doesn't mean they automatically discount a suspect. proof of what you missed have been found through people you whine about not liking you! you can't handle rejection, you can't handle the fact of a botched investigation. you cover it by whining we don't like you. people were tired of hearing your constantly bringing up things you called VERIFIED. the house being paid in cash was one of them. some of us took your advice and verified ourselves! you seem to overlook any other possibilities for anything other than your own conclusions. that's not how it's done. I also noticed you changed your website on whining about my forum. you removed the entire comment. why, I though you claimed it justified? you constantly change things Robert. look back dozens of pages and you will clearly see why your not always welcome in places. you whine about trust on this forum, and yet you are always under fire. you can't even leave reviews alone without going dozens of rounds with them on a site where you are trying to sell something! sock puppet or not they sided with him. Robert, I believe others have also told you this. you do in fact have an enemy, it's Robert M Blevins. you won't find any truth unless you open your own mind. what you think is proof is not looked at the same by others, this includes the FBI. Law Enforcement doesn't trust anyone, why should I trust what you say? several have shown you problems in your investigation. research, that's what it's all about Robert. regardless of what my feelings are about you doesn't change facts that have been uncovered. unfortunately those facts disrupt your theory leaving only words to tell a story. that doesn't fly either. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  23. Robert, people telling you something is hardly verification to any type of cash loan. it's a start. if you don't have any documents, receipts, or anything of that nature, it can not be proof, or verification. remember the word lying you like to toss around? just because they told you makes it truthful? can I get a loan based on my friends stating I'm good for the loan? Some of the people you interviewed have a credibility issue. The people you don't listen to that have verification and are listed below. The FBI. "But after reading the New York magazine story, Carr doesn't think Kenny Christiansen is D.B. Cooper." "He's not a viable suspect," FBI spokeswoman Robbie Burroughs said." "all the suspects still being touted by Cooper sleuths have been ruled out" Ayn Dietrich, a former analyst with the bureau, is still now tasked with handling inquiries about the Cooper case. nobody is reading the document wrong. you are the one who has the document with incorrect data. period. why would you remove it from everywhere else except the PDF? both claimed the samething. Now, if I, or anyone else posted a document like that. you would be all over it screaming lies, it's full of lies. screen shots and all. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  24. "Porteous says. After five years of checking out KC/Cooper" Robert, are you saying Skipp has been pursuing KC for the last 5 years? doesn't say much about his skills by failing to look up simple public records that found differences in the KC saga? "What exactly is the Cooper Biz" how hard is it to get away from. I'm a little confused? If Kenny's house isn't a major factor, why was it constantly brought up in the top 10-25, mentioned several times in the PDF, on your website, and probably in the videos? it seems it was extremely important until it was proven not to be true. was it you, or Skipp who failed to notice the document you claim Kenny paid $10 for the lot behind his home? it's actually the lot the house is on, and not the lot behind his house. leaving those items on that PDF doesn't make you look very good Robert. sending the incorrect data to the FBI wasn't a smooth move either. did Skipp also approve this PDF? the PDF should have been taken down as soon as the problems were found. you don't leave inaccurate data up until you "update it" a year or so later. it's misleading! especially if the author is aware of the problems. It's not rocket science trying to determine who Kenny was. it's actually pretty simple. he was a purser for several decades with Northwest Airlines. his close friends seem to be stretching the truth, much like Bernie about the whole thing. I think the FBI also agrees with this conclusion. it's common for people to group together and come up with a matching story. it's called a conspiracy with all of the inaccuracies, I can clearly see why you wish to stop the pursuit of DB Cooper..... "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI
  25. Jo, we can go back and forth on this. people are slandering my site. Bob Knoss is on here constantly slandering people, and yet he remains. lets try a be a little centered on what is being told here shall we? no site is immune to it. the problem was dealt with, it's over. either go to the courthouse and file, or let it go. it's not doing anyone any good constantly bringing it up.....it's counter productive. "It is surprising how aggressive people get, once they latch onto their suspect and say, 'Hey, he's our guy.' No matter what you tell them, they refuse to believe you" Agent Carr FBI