mrshutter45

???????????you drive to the location. I see plenty of spots to park. it's an open road, correct. park nearby. jump out walk a couple hundred feet into the woods. take some photo's and leave? It's your scheduled search. not Eric's? you are trying to find evidence. it's different. even though, the placard weighs an ounce and the chute and briefcase would be miles away if they were even tossed at the same time, or the placard came off from lying on the stairs. nothing would be found around the placard if that's it's original location....

No need for hundreds of pics and miles of video...short and simple..I'll send my drone to your location as a lookout..

Robert, this has nothing to do with you. he's going there before your event. it's out in the middle of nowhere. I doubt Swat will get involved. and, I doubt he will be there very long. sometimes, you just have to live on the edge.

I was talking with Eric. I don't see any problems with what he's doing. he's a grown up and can tend to himself. he may not be from there but I think he will do just fine... Thanks for the concern....

Great Eric, very simple and to the point. no long post or explanation. you don't have GPS capabilities?

What I'm implying is ground view shots.....taken from a camera on the spot would benefit the case. not the actual location that's been well established and documented. I'm interested in what the area looks like from ground level. not from the air which can be found in multiple ways. I've been testing the characteristics of the card with drop tests. it doesn't just tumble as some believe. I'm curious to the area's landscape from the ground to see how it's believed a one ounce card never moved in 7 years. today the wind was in the upper 20's and the card didn't stay stationary. it blew around several times. the forest is different since it will block some of the winds but getting a better view will help in this debate.

I didn't "request" photo's I've seen looking up myself. it's the actual area where it was found. I also notice you finally figured out it was private property. amazing, coming from a guy in Florida Ground view...exact spot. no sat. pic, or Google 3D will show this...

It doesn't show the ground level inside the forest. I would like to see what the area looks like where the card supposedly spent 7 years without moving...

Since your not going to the location until later in the year I will get someone else to get some photo's of the landscape. no biggie...

Actually, the location of the placard would be a benefit to the case. nobody knows what the landscape looks like. some believe the card never moved from it's location making the flight path incorrect based on the winds that evening.

Thanks...

Why is my name attached to the post above. I've never made that statement. is this a quote from Derek?

He's using either a proxy server or a VPN that will hide his actual IP address making it hard to stop him unless you have approval only membership. he tried it several times on my forum..

"My response is who the hell knows what is true and what is not sometimes in the Cooper investigation." If you took the time to read the 302's you would find that they did check on NWO employee's. I found several pages speaking about background checks. it's common practice.

I'm not going to continue to post here while things like this continue. I refuse to even debate this issue.

Derek, you obviously haven't a clue what you are talking about. it's impossible to be at that location. the plane would have to be going much faster then they claim on the transcripts. perhaps you are mixing this up with them believing he jumped further south. that doesn't mean you move a time on the map. What the problem appears to be is the oscillations were noted on the transcripts but not the pressure bump. a difference is known between the two.

you are NOT at the 8:09 location. it's above Lake Merwin.

Only the front side stairs were used. those are the stairs they were trying to get everyone down. not the back one's. that's how everything arrived on the plane..the side stairs... If they had the ladder ready in the cockpit to escape. they could of left while Tina was making the last run with the demands..Cooper would of been all by himself. Rat said he missed that opportunity..

Read all the files...still more than these listed below... Bill even explains in a video about missing the chance when Tina was outside the plane to escape. the lowering of the ladder had nothing to do with Bills plan.

Those pesky facts

Cossey claimed the chute was made of silk, which we know now to be 99.9% NOT TRUE. Based on what evidence? FBI says later they only did this by phone. How do you identify a chute by telephone? Careful, rocket science following.. Hmm, ask the diameter of the chute to what is on record, the markings on it for starters?

Try to follow this simple policy the FBI and all law enforcement have. it has nothing to do with a book size amount of data. only one part of the 1,000,000 pages you believe. The Amboy parachute found near Amboy was determined to not be any of the chutes from the hijacking on November 24, 1971. now, standard policy is NOT to discuss an on going investigation with anyone outside of the FBI. The Amboy chute was part of the investigation even though it was dismissed it still falls under the guidelines of the case. this policy seems to allow others to assume they are covering things up because they are not satisfied with the results. sure, it would be nice for them to go into details about everything, but they don't. look at the 302's. they redact phone numbers that won't even work today. addresses that no longer exist. names of people that are dead. Tom Colbert had to get a lawyer to have files released. Why did they dismiss suspect #234, or 547 of the thousand plus suspects they have? what are they hiding? they never explained that either, did they? how about the full reason they believed LD was Cooper. they never explained that? more time and manpower would be required to satisfy the constant requests from everyone asking or demanding answers to an open case. nothing in the policy says they have to be mean, or nice? it's just a policy. it would be never ending trying to satisfy everyone. once again, you yourself play the very same game they do then you accuse them of covering things up. Cossey stated the chute was 30 some feet in diameter. he didn't explain if he measured it or not. someone did. it would be "foolish" if they didn't. the markings are not consistent with a personnel chute. not much can be done if you believe Cossey is lying. he can't be lying about the markings on the chute. it's really not a mystery to me that it has nothing to do with the hijacking. I myself have wasted enough time trying to explain one simple policy the FBI has...

You sound like they should tell you everything. that's not how it works. how many parachutes do you think are white? a quarter, half? other chutes were found in the area and nobody says a word. the FBI didn't explain those either. you don't know if they have the chute or not anymore. they didn't hide anything from Tom. my guess is they gave him access to what was relevant to the case. where are the other chutes found? my guess if they were found not to be involved they probably discarded them. do you keep thing that are no value to you? I never once said nobody has a right to ask the FBI anything. never said it, not once. what I did say is they are not going to give you any information on an open case. it's policy. that goes for things that end up being a dead end. you would still be discussing the case. Is it really fair in this case. probably not, but it's there policy. You believe they did a piss-poor job based on public information. you really don't know what they know. it also appears that since the case began decades ago they seem tired of the same old same old. nothing new but a handful of people screaming they know who Cooper is. reading the 302's, lots of screaming has been going on for some time and I don't blame them for shutting it down. I bet the Hoffa case is even worse with leads telling them they know where he is or who killed him. conspiracies galore fly out of that case. I think a lot of things could easily be explained if we had everything they have. they just don't care what we think.

As far as I know nobody tried to match the markings to a cargo chute. I found several of them and posted them multiple times over the years. you lack the reasoning to understand a personnel chute has much more information on it. The photo below is a personnel canopy. note the difference in data....they don't just put a date on it with a non-traceable number...I'm sure regulations are requiring this information. you are on a skydiving site, so ask instead of assuming it's Cooper's and it's the chute from the hijacking. yes, you are implying that. The FBI is not obligated to tell us anything. especially if it's an open case. you can't call the FBI liars when you try to use someone just looking at the chute and stating something. that's the same tactics you accuse the FBI of by just looking at it...quickly, over the phone etc. what do you know about the phone calls. perhaps easy ways to find out whether the chute is of value. can you prove that can't be done? you have no way of even knowing how long the chute was at that location. was it months, years, decades?

You have no proof they still have the chute. even if it's not considered evidence they will not talk about it because it's linked to the case. the stamp on it is NOT consistent with a personnel chute. the markings are consistent with a cargo chute. thousands of them were sold to the public and are laying all over the country. you don't have any idea how long it was even in the place it was found. just like 36% of forestland is private property. The point is. even if it was ruled out it's still part of the case. that's a loophole that gives them the right to say they can't discuss it. it's not very hard to understand.