mrshutter45

I've told you...you are still not listening....I showed the hypocrisy in your statements over the last five years doing the very samething you preached against...follow? I don't want anything from you. you have wasting time with everyone reading all this crap? it all started from YOU...

We are within every right to reject what ever we wish? dangling a carrot of cash isn't going to cut it. it's very tacky to keep repeating that. nobody was on my forum constantly discussing you Robert. that's another false narrative. Trying to get a bunch of people who don't like the things you do is not a good idea from get go? I'm also within my rights to give any reason why or give the reason if asked. you can hold an event in a stadium for all I care. this is America. make it happen and stop blaming others. the public is not sitting on the edge of there seats waiting for a huge Cooper event? it's just an old unsolved case. get the Decoded team together and hold an event that will be seen around the world? stop crying over spilled milk and do it....just don't come off as God demanding others to work around your schedule?

lol, your hard statement over the last five years was people talking about you on a forum you were banned from. that's no different than "reporting" it's still posting on public sites. you claimed for years playing victim to this cause. now, you are on a site with articles surrounding members from this forum, mine and TMN and decide we can't speak out on them? real name, username, R2D2 status means squat. you have removed the ability to defend. that makes it slanted by your own logic. this is what I'm pointing out vs complaining. your not practicing what you preach. especially, complaining everyone should work together? even more hypocrisy... Added: the National Enquirer is reporting too. they get sued all the time.

I'm not complaining about anything. you don't get it. I'm showing the obvious hypocrisy in your statements over the years about not being able to defend yourself against accusations. I have to repeat myself over and over to you. you have articles on there surrounding other members and probably me. I didn't look over the whole site. now, you claim we can't defend ourselves there just as you have claimed the last five years....you don't practice what you preach. it's not just the one question. it's the actions around it....

Here is what I see. nobody has spoken about you in a long time on my forum. I can't say that for TMN. as for this thread. the bickering needs to stop. that means the constant bringing up the past over and over while people wish to discuss the case. it's counter productive. not everyone likes that "cup of tea" as you say. I don't have a problem not being able to post on your articles but showed the obvious hypocrisy. you have been on Quora for sometime now so it's not like it came out yesterday and nobody is flooding the place wanting to trash it. you have every right to allow who ever to comment but can't sing the song any longer about censorship and not being able to defend..just keep in mind you were banned for behavior reason and not asking legit questions....that's the best I can explain..

Yes, I didn't want this to happen on my site. you have now done it twice on here. it clogs the forum up. I don't question what you did on Quora. I know what you did. I was silenced for asking a question. a question that you actually agreed was valid. now, similar to your complaints over the years hundreds of them screaming you can't defend yourself is now stating Eric or Bruce can't defend themselves on the articles you wrote on Quora about them. you are doing what you preached against. this is the hypocrisy I keep explaining to you. I decided you and Jo would not be welcome on my forum. then you joined under a false name to disrupt proving my original statement of behavior issues and reason for you not being welcome. you complain of people not working together and censor them at the same time lol.

Lets not forget over the years of you constantly complaining not being able to defend yourself where you have been banned? legit reasons were noted why this took place. now, it appears that you can censor those you feel censored you? two wrongs make a right in this logic? Eric can't defend himself with the articles posted on Quora or Bruce? we know I've been censored for asking a legit question? isn't this like being pre-banned. something you constantly bring up over the years? wouldn't this be considered slanted as you always state? you make articles about others and don't allow a defense to take place where questions can be asked below the article directly to the source? what caused the pre-banning of others? I'm not objecting to the right to do what you are stating but it's rather hypocritical. it sounds like you want to tell things the way you see fit and exclude any challenge and not allow what happens here to happen on Quora. remember, you were banned for reasons on other forums. we appear to be banned simply for exclusion. you are doing the exact samething you preached against for the last five years..fearing what happens here to happening at Quora shows you know very well all of this doesn't belong here....

DZ wasn't the concern. it was the censorship of legit questions. doesn't matter how hard it is to find someone. you don't look for someone who posted an article. that means they are right there. then as mentioned scold people for not going directly to the source. asking a legit question on article made by that person is as direct as one can get. it was censored. if it was disruptive or included going into detail about other things diverting from the actual question, then yes, remove it. Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".Censorship can be conducted by a government, private institutions, and corporations.

Didn't you scold others for asking a question about you on my forum and not going to you for the answer? it's different when someone asks a question surrounding statements in an article you wrote?

Censoring questions is never a good idea. if they are disruptive then yes. that's what public forums and sites consist of. you have the right to do that but I don't believe it's right in this case. especially when the article was inaccurate as I stated in my censored comment. you didn't come on my forum with anything legit other than spite. since you censored me on that question. I shouldn't have posted anything here backing my censored comment, but I did. you censored it on Quora and DEMANDED it here? kind of hypocritical, no?

Yes, yes I do. you brought it up, not me. then post a version not accurate of the event. bringing up a ban from 2014 is a protest, no?

I don't have any fascination with Quora. it's something once again brought up by you. I read the article and commented and was censored. a legit question was asked and removed. then you actually realized the question was valid and state you are changing it? as mentioned before...way to go...

The reason why you were not welcome on my forum is because this happens where ever you go. Quora is not related to Cooper investigators. it's a different format. it's something you formed. yes, you can block me but now you no longer have the right to blame me for blocking you. I had my reasons prior to your intrusion. that only sealed the deal.

Okay, so then I can make a bunch of articles and complain for the next 5 years about being censored on Quora for asking a legit question and being pre-banned from commenting?

Sure, and letting them down by posting inaccurate material and then censoring those trying to alert them of the inaccurate information. way to go.. No, I don't mean Quora in my post above. it's not like I came into that site under false pretenses or hid my identity to disrupt. it was a legit question that was censored...

There would be no actual reason to do what you did that would be considered "normal". what you did was disruptive. that's the bottom line. you already new your were not welcome so you caused more trouble by your own actions. if a store told you that you were not welcome you would put a dress on and walk in to prove you could?

So, then you are trying to silence me? you can speak and I can't...got it...

Stop bringing things up and it will cease. it's pretty simple, no? the "enough already" should be directed your way. you started the conversation, not me...

Then Cooper starts getting discussed and you guys drift off topic again......the name of this thread needs to be changes. it's not really a Cooper thread.

I don't approve of what some of those write on TMN but you ask for it with your actions. they are pushing your buttons everytime they write. a week has passed since they said a law suit was going to be produced. did it happen? they are playing you. there is no legit liable case from you or them. everyone knows it. even Flyjack pointed this out. Same for Galen posting on my forum in 2014! that thread with all the comments was removed years ago. I still have it locked where only I see it. I read it yesterday and it shows me warning Galen multiple times before putting his postings on approval prior to being posted. then he sent me a PM asking to be removed. the thread started March 14, 2014 and ended May 13, 2014 after being locked down. not long after that it was taken off the Cooper board and hidden in the non Cooper related board that is no longer visible to anyone. he was also going after Jo a lot in that thread. it wasn't just you. What you still haven't answered is the fact of wanting comments removed on my forum and the Mountain news but allow them to remain on this thread without a word spoken? Georger made the comment of Gray not liking you, not me which you just accused me of the other day. it's on this very thread. do you see any bias or discrimination anywhere, or could we use Cooper's term of a "grudge". according to you it's lies that don't belong, right, even though it hasn't been proven one way or the other years later? You threatened me for posting your address that was made public by you on 4 websites. I even posted those sites showing it was already public. what threat could you possibly have? "please stop posting my address or legal action will take place"

Again, it doesn't matter what happened prior to your ACTUAL ban. it was once again due to YOUR actions. YOU came onto the site under a false name specifically to DISRUPT. that's what got you banned. you really can't "pre-ban" a membership not formed yet, right? if you joined under your real name then it would of been true if you were banned. then you would have a case. even a kangaroo court doesn't have a case. you proved the reason why you were discussed not being welcome by your own actions. It wasn't a back-an-forth thing. I said you and Jo would not be welcome. that's my right. blocking someone for a legit question is censorship and spite. a question ending in correction of the article! Sorry.

My work is done.... Good day.

Final document...

If you go by the documents I already provided you will see that 11 were lifted from certain area's of the plane and sent to the lab. later in 1976 they claim 8 prints were lifted in and around the seat being fingerprints and a palm print. reading the 302's and suspects they mention several times not having a palm print for that suspect. don't even think palms were taken back then. they seem to focus on the palm print...

A 403 error is not done by human intervention. it's internal. I don't even know enough about it but it's happened to me multiple times on multiple sites. it happened here for two days but might of been a 500 something error. the eye's comment is in reference to print documents...not the 403 error. The bottom line is if the IP changed. you are not blocked. I don't know your new IP...