mrshutter45

Members
  • Content

    3,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by mrshutter45

  1. Nothing, simply pointing out flaws...I can't speak for Parrot but that's my answer?
  2. Lots of people, including myself read the comments. sometimes I stop the video to read them. he fails to follow the point of being objective to what he allows on his video's that appear to be on approval prior to publishing them. I agree harsh or nasty comments should be removed but one's that may differ from what the video states should be allowed for all to read that could help in deciding what they actually believe or possibly missed in the video. I've watched video's and came to a different conclusion until I read the comments...
  3. Robert, you keep saying this is the largest thread on Cooper so you would tend to believe a person with space at Quora would include this site while promoting DB Cooper. doesn't have to have links. this is where you hangout a majority of your time is spent here. why would you allow space for gossip about the Cooper world and leave out a large venue that discusses DB Cooper? it appears you had been given that space for DB Cooper, right? why leave out key components of "reaching the public" and zero mention of this site? would a person involved in remote control hobbies have a forum and leave out key places to get things related to that hobby, like the largest hobby shop in his area? you seem to downplay this site and promote the hell out of Quora where Cooper is the main topic? Again, my failure to remove any comments are not a subject of censorship by leaving them BURIED in a thread from years ago. get over that. it's not the same as removing opinion's surround a video. opinion's that don't agree with the video is what you don't seem to allow. evidence supports that. I also find it funny when something like Reichenbach is brought up it's old and doesn't matter. a majority of the crap you bring up is five years old. threats of wanting someone's real name should be noted though, sorry.
  4. I was told by Reichenbach that he was a team of four using the same username. I have that PM right here on this site. they grew tired of your wanting them to "conform" to you and contacted me here. we discussed other things for a while and then they decided to turn over the six FBI files (302's) with the statements of the crew. they were the first to be published before Gray posted his. mine also differ coming from Las Vegas vs Seattle. this was after your rants of believing they were working with me and they left the your site. it was after the fact. they also found out what is to be believe the person behind the famous YouTube video's about the Playboy clipping letter. Flyjack recently found the same and reported what they had also determined.
  5. You fail to follow the logic. yes, you are objective and censor things. your own words stated the removal of bad comments on YT. others, not Just Parrots have commented on your video's with only saying they don't believing he was Cooper and they were never published. screaming for five years the fact of not being able to defend one's self on a site you were banned from and turn around doing the very samething is hypocritical. No, I have the PM Reichenbach gave me years ago. I posted it often where you threaten him to give his real name because you thought he was "playing both sides of the fence". you didn't like his comments like "I like Shuter and his site" regardless to what you try and say it's very unprofessional to do or even attempt something like that to a member of any forum or site. you honor and protect there privacy. PERIOD. you even posted Georger's unlisted phone number because he called you at midnight and decided it was wrong and hungup? you even held your own forum hostage from public view if I didn't allow links and photo's to been seen by guests. you have some serious anger and animosity issues. I just wonder how many others you threaten when they are linked to me and others? You are just screaming about things that happened years ago. some still occur but not on my site. it's only recent news because you keep bringing it up.
  6. All that writing and it spells noise. You don't have space somewhere about Cooper and leave out one of the largest (your words) places for people to learn about DB Cooper. sounds more like someone being objective once again. we already know you censor YouTube and don't allow people to defend themselves when things are written about them. you would never scream that, right lol. how about being a administrator/owner of a forum and demanding a member gives up his real name or be removed from that forum? (Reichenbach) . imagine someone trying to take advantage of someone like that. pretty low, right, trust, really? that's the lowest thing someone could even attempt to do to a member. You are the number one poster on this thread and you hide it from a place you would think you would include in articles. you could leave the link out and write how it's important in learning about Cooper. that's your reason for being there, right or is it self promotion? Quora is more set up to gossip about others and say misleading things about them, that's what Quora is over telling them about an important venue on the internet about discussing DB Cooper. really? all you can reply with is 1000 words of noise and use a jealousy card, lol...
  7. I think they are setting a point as to someone knowing something about the case or finding something as I mentioned in the attic and finding out Grandpa was Cooper..
  8. I don't see anything really missing if they failed to mention a body. they didn't say note or bomb? if a body was found in the woods of Washington. the local LE would handle the body until it was determined to be Cooper's then the FBI would get involved. if the parachute and money were found in an attic they would probably still call the local police and then the FBI. it was pretty simple what they said. it would have to be something tied to the case. as in the money or chute. doesn't mean they don't imply a body found in the woods. if you call them saying the guy buried in some cemetery was Cooper they won't follow up without anything tied to it like the chute, money etc.
  9. If a body was found in the woods believed to be Cooper. evidence would surely be around the body..that's a little different.
  10. To reopen the case with an agent would require the chute or money..anything actually tied to the case as proof would grant further investigation. doesn't require solving the case. it would reopen the case.
  11. “In order to solve a case, the FBI must prove culpability beyond a reasonable doubt, and, unfortunately, none of the well-meaning tips or applications of new investigative technology have yielded the necessary proof." You would still need something other than a body. the surfacing of any money, parachute, note would allow them to reopen the investigation that could lead to a living or dead body...proof of the chute elsewhere or the money would open there eye's and not a claim of a body being Cooper. that puts it back to suspects and rabbit holes.
  12. It's my understanding this is being discussed in the background by people already surrounding this issue of censorship. I find it odd that this site isn't a center piece at Quora (viewed by millions) given the fact of being one of the largest Cooper outlets. you would think a Cooper based space at Quora (viewed by millions) would have multiple articles (big one's) supporting the thread with direct links. Parrot: funny how he glossed over about you not being in the 10 comments removed that were not appropriate. should of mentioned the fact of you trying to pull one over on him. that would of been an article right there? Added: now I'm getting information from people that are not members..
  13. Robert, you fail to follow simple logic. I can be the worst person on earth. that doesn't make what you are doing any better. you don't like objective material on your sites. it's proven. members of your own forum left due to wanting them to "conform" more censorship. sure, a lot was said about you. the other side of the coin shows you doing the very samething. a lot of this was from similar actions done here whinging and insulting us. you have called people lowlife scumbags, had a moderator attacking people. this is all old news from 2014,15......this surrounds your actions here and statements made in this time period. you don't like objectionable material on Quora and it's been proven you don't allow it on YouTube. we understand now and can move on...it's boring and pointless and Cooper needs to return to the board... Added: looking over Quora I can't seem to find anything about this forum?
  14. This is about your actions....not others..this is not a court of law. the subject surrounds your comments..don't expect people to buy into this. you fail to allow anything objective. I remember Parrot telling me about this a while back.
  15. Comments below an article or video are for the purpose of commenting on what was read or viewed. you have a right to agree or disagree with what's read or viewed. you also read the opinion's of others. asking someone to post the article or video in another location to ask a question you believe will be negative is censoring the article, video and others from viewing the opinion by that person. if it's a nasty statement you remove that comment and block the user. now, you say you don't want us commenting, okay. that was never pointed out and still doesn't explain the failure to post Parrots respectable opinion about Kenny not being Cooper that you didn't know was him or any of us. it shows you don't want anything negative just like Quora. I should of been block previously since you censored the comment anyway? wasn't the first time either. my account has my name not "Shutter" .
  16. You create this false narrative of hate and anger that you cover for your censorship. Quora has comments below the articles and I posted on it. apparently it wasn't censored because it was me. it appears that you don't like anything negative. stating the article was inaccurate is something you don't want to be seen and asked elsewhere like the YouTube video's you told Parrot the very samething but didn't even know who made the comment and still censored it..this is very obvious to see...
  17. Robert, you will never learn. By the way. asking someone to actually post a video and comment in a different location is censorship. you give the positive a free pass and want other comments moved away so the others can't see what opinion they had. you had no idea who Parrot was and still censored the comment. You have been exposed. then another false narrative that we want to rush Quora? Grow up Robert.
  18. I believe it's in everyone's best interest to stop discussing the politics surrounding the case and use this thread for what's intended for which is the discussion of DB Cooper. we have plenty of avenues for Cooper to be heard whether you are involved in one venue or all of them. makes no difference if it's for the public. some promote the case and suspects while others dig deep looking for truths. lets face it. the public has had the same amount of time as the FBI. people involved in the case have found things the FBI didn't be it scientific or from reaching deep into the case. the public has come in last unfortunately in this case vs other unsolved mysteries where they were solved by public interest. still nothing wrong at all focusing on them. I will no longer engage in the bickering and respond to Cooper related information.
  19. I never said that. I don't know how you read into things so wrong. yes, I said you can do what ever you wish. I can't tell you not to hold an event. I can tell you when you are wrong. the people I know and converse with do get along and hold events. that I know for sure. these events don't always have to be about the amount of seats filled. I hear them exited to see each other again and discuss the case before during and after these events. you see the pictures with smiles ear to ear next to each other regardless to 50 or 300 showing up. even after the email sent to the country club you still put the event down which means all involved including Tom and 377. I've never spoken with Eric surrounding what happened with Jim. it was a recipe for disaster to begin with. you have the Decoded team, claims of filling the speaker spots rapidly and live right in the epicenter of the crime and the thousands on Quora making a perfect recipe for success. you claim you don't need us so be my guest. nobody is standing in your way. I really don't know what else to tell you?
  20. I agree with you doing your thing and visa versa. none of this would of been an issue if you took that lead? I've also stated my facts well. sorry you got caught in the line of fire so to speak. you just can't scream censorship while doing the very samething. those are facts hard to deny... I've taken some time off to remodel the interior of my home. new hardwood floors, painting the walls etc. not a lot gets done in the daytime with the phone ringing constantly so I work a lot in the evening. I still don't see how you do this year after year and function properly in the daytime.
  21. You mean the very same way you could of done this instead of whining censorship for five years saying you couldn't defend yourself, more hypocrisy lol. you already said most were censored from Quora so that's why I state others. it's simple logic. Wasn't the other point you often quoted not being able to defend yourself on a forum you were blocked from was considered slanted since you couldn't respond and only hear one side? it's okay for you to block others from commenting on articles about them you post lol, really? Lets focus here, shall we? you were banned from my forum for behavior reasons mentioned a hundred times. now, if someone says something you don't like it's slanted because you can't come onto the forum and defend yourself. correct. that's what your claim has been for years. now, you post articles about me and others but don't allow the names involved in the article to respond on that article which would be just like a forum or any other public format? does hypocrite, hypocrisy, slanted or any other word ring a bell with this logic? you go further. after the ban from Bruce you kept posting under false names and claiming censorship when he removed the comments that shouldn't have been there in the first place....wasn't Tom and 377 part of the same old shit heard at Eric's events? Hello, is anybody in there lol. yes, this is very very boring....
  22. LOL, not whining Robert. this all started with you whining. it's direct reply to what you posted. what ends up happening is you keep bringing more issues up causing an endless loop. post after post of negative comments from you. then all of the sudden you turn it around saying it's boring and has no point? Again, you are putting words into my mouth. I never said to remove anything or implied that. you don't allow the people you write about to defend themselves which is in direct conflict to what you have preached for five years. you have complained people don't want to work with you and censor them at the sametime is not resolving anything. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy and not asking for you to do anything or demanding anything. you have been on that site for a while now and who else commented? nobody that I know of. you fear others will do what you do appears to be the issue. you are scared of yourself basically.
  23. Never once claimed that. it's amazing how you would put something like that together lol. that's not even close to what we were talking about what so ever...it surrounds the hypocrisy coming from your past statements. it seems when it doesn't go your way it becomes boring and then accusations of wanting you not to go camping lol. you can do what ever you wish. just don't include me. how hard can this truly be? it must be extremely hard for you since you constantly bring it up and then claim it's boring? this is a product of YOU. I didn't bring any of this up, you did...yes, it is boring...
  24. If you didn't make these statements nobody would respond, right? now, all the sudden it's boring? you are being challenged for statements made by you. especially when they are inaccurate or go against past statements made once again by YOU? it's not that hard to understand. it appears you don't like challenge and like it when you can say what ever you wish? if it bores you, perhaps not bringing up these subjects will ease the boredom? Just saying....
  25. It's replies to your statements lol...one's you started not me. do you follow?