craddock

Grow up Bill. First off it is mostly Bob Hebert that I don't believe, the Journalist. But your saying that I need to believe everything an Army Reservist says or I hate them and am spiting on them?? That even a bigger bunch of bullshit. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

What a bunch of Bullshit. I don't buy it for a second. But hey if it fits your agenda it must be true. Josj btw- Who believes Coke is sending Glass bottles over to Iraq? Bunch of crap, that's all that article is. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Thank you for your post That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

I am done with you Kennedy. I neve said these bills make sense or that I support them. I don't know what the fuck your problem is. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Why am I looking at these? I responded to a post where someone suggested their muzzleloader was included in the ban. Where did I imply any .50 cal a sniper rifle. Did I even use the word "sniper"? Wtf That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

I would have loved to get a tax benefit after my marriage . Hell it would have been great just to be able to still file single. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

"tax benifits" Is that why they call it the marriage penalty? That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

I guess the ownership of this "50 caliber sniper weapon" (see attached) makes me a criminal in Feinstein's eyes. What a misguided, hypocritical cunt.*** Dude, please understand the difference between a centerfire rifle and a muzzleloader. Even Modern Muzzlelader firearms that use a #209 primer are not considered a centerfire rifle in terms of these attempted .50 cal. bans. "rifle capable of firing a center-fire cartridge in .50 caliber, .50 BMG caliber, any other variant of .50 caliber, or any metric equivalent of such calibers " That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

I'd say so. I have reread it and have no idea why you think I want to place any requirements on owning firearms. I was responding to someone else who was however, and I questioned him on sending people off to serve who are in no shape to do so. I also never even mentioned anything about being physically fit. I suppose you got that from "in any shape". There is alot more that goes into being "in shape" to let's say go oversees and serve, than being physically fit That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Indeed. Although, if you were going to only grab one at a time it might not be that bad, but then why not just clear the cables with the off hand like if you are concerned. I just thought it was a somewhat silly to suggest, and one who crossed their arms to grab both handles would most likely see the error in their suggestion. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Where in the fuck do you come up with this crap? I never implied any such thing! That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

No to all. What the fuck John? Have you gone mad? That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Your advocating personal not trained in military combat be called upon to serve the country because they are capable of firing a weapon? WOW! Most of the people I know that own/buy Full Auto Weapons are not in any shape to be defending our country. Unbelieveable That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

So what? Are you that worried about your image? It is obvious he just responded to the last post. As soon as I read the post I actually thought " I wonder how long it will take Ron to cry that he did not write that". It took longer than I thought. You must have been busy. Relax. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

I had my dog on a BARF (bones and raw food) for some time. It was just to time consuming preparing meals. I need to get a quality food processer if I ever go back to that route. He still gets raw meat bone and all as a supplement Going to a quality dry food was not so much a cost issue. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Are you serious? Put your rig on and quickly grab both handles and try to fire cutaway followed by reserve. I think you will find your answer. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

?? @#$!@ That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Glocks are awsome guns in terms of reliabiity no doubt. They also have a pretty severe grip angle and dont feel right with alot of people. There are alot of great guns on the market, but if you are looking for a inexpensive reliable gun, I would give serious look toward an SA XD-9 or XD-40. Great reliablilty, Lifetime warrenty, and a grip angle desinged for the 1911 fan. I have shot both the 9 and 40 a small amount(about 40 rounds each) and shot them very accurate in semi rapid fire shooting. I have seen them with a nylon holster and extra mag for just over $400. They are starting to be a serious competition for Glock in the LEO circles from what I have understand. SA is an awesome company to deal with. I have a Loaded Operator 1911 from them and when I thought it was shooting a couple of inches low after my first shoot with it, they told me to send it back and they would make sure it was POA. I wa very close to buying a Kimber before I picked this up and I don't regret my decision one bit. They are both awesome guns. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

John never said what you have quoted. If you are attempting to imply the above quote came from him I believe it to be in bad tact. It is simply not what he said. I would venture his true comment came as a result of your comment below(which is a direct quote) Realizing that English is not your first language this comment may have came across wrong to some people. Nevertheless you have misquoted John Josh I have bought my son his first 20 gauge and refinished an old .22 passed down from my grandfather to give to him when he is ready. It will be several years yet though- he is due in July That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Another 1911 fan here although I do not have a Kimber. I looked at them but went with a SA Loaded Operator. Great gun also with a lifetime warrenty. It has fed everything I have threw at it so far. Thinking about getting a x200 surefire for the rail soon. Any ideas anyone on a holster(non ccw) for this gun? It's rail is full length and I have yet to find anything in stock to fit nice. I am thinking of having the rail cut down like the Kimber or SA TRP though. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

You need to pack the Flexon with toggles out rather than toward the reserve packing tray. Otherwise, yes it tends to leave the toggles exposed. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

What I am talking about though is not companies taking advantage of people, it's about companies protecting themselves. We do all we can to make sure our end users do not get ripped off by distributers. We need our products to be priced competitively to avoid losing it to competition. They save lot's of time and money by using our product. On the flip side sometimes we need make sure our distributors remain competitve to avoid losing them to competition. This very rarely happens but when it does we may step in. Raising a price or withholding a product is a last resort and it really protects everyone, including the end user. If we allow people to give product away at very low margins and advertise this throughout the country, we could be the ones getting screwed. Regardless of you definition of the word "whore" , it is common to hear the word used to describe a distributor going after someone elses pre-exsiting business by dropping the margins very low and taking it away on price. Were talking about a consumable product. This is often called "whoring up the market" That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.

Not when the manufacturer loses bussiness to other customers that don't what to compete with a whore. They take on a competitors product and I lose sales. It's quite simple really yet it seems to be going over your head. Again this is a consumable product I am talking about. If you decide to sell it with no markup and ship all over the country, you are going to get quite a bit of business most likely. What is also most likely is that my other customers are not going to want to sell a product at no margin so they will chose take on another line where they can make more margins. Now because of this me and my company lose sales. Wrong. If I raise your price because of your actions, you are unable to give your customers better pricing. So I would say the manufacturer can have quite a bit of choice in the matter. Manufactures should not let their customers run their business. Sorry to hurt your feeling, but we are out to make money. Not sacrifice sales on account of one customer's lousy business practices. That spot isn't bad at all, the winds were strong and that was the issue! It was just on the downwind side.