jaybird18c
-
Content
1,598 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jaybird18c
-
Come on down to Skydive Panama City (Tri-County Airport, Bonifay, FL) when you “quite” your job. I’ll buy you a jump!
-
You gotta admit the Kyle stuff was funny though, right? That’s a great movie!
-
What does your liberal clan do, tag in, tag out, or something? SkyDekker…don’t cry bro. If you can’t back up your stuff, don’t worry about it.
-
Catch up bro. You’re interpretation of what jurisdiction means isn’t what the original author of the amendment meant.
-
SkyDekker may be a little like Kyle, but he CAN dance!
-
Everyone has to interpret words. What are you talking about? But you haven’t actually quoted anything specific to interpret. Regarding the other, “Low T” in effect, I guess.
-
I say again. I read the code you cited. Did you? Why can’t you quote the part which backs up your assertion? Also, what’s your home DZ and are you there much? I’d like very much to make road trip (when I say “road trip,” I mean fly) and come jump with you sometime. I’d even be willing to set an article of clothing on fire to test a hypothesis.
-
Ok. I read it. Please quote the part which backs up your assertion.
-
Is that the one which will be challenged for constitutionality?
-
Lawful.
-
I get your unwillingness to back up your own bullshit. It’s embarrassing. But all things are forgotten in time. You’ll be alright. I will too as long as I don’t catch fire or something and have to rely on you to piss on me to put it out.
-
Are you crying? There’s no crying in this…
-
It’s incumbent on the individual making the assertion to back it up. Unless you’re just one of those douchebags who like to just try and “look” smart. It’s easy for “Low T” types to “appear” smart though. I’ll give you that. You know…the rather pale, malnourished look…kind of nerdy.
-
Your country no longer has jurisdiction over you when you visit America?
-
Correct. And watch the corrections begin!
-
No you didn’t. You made an assertion followed by a F-ing asshole personal remark. Here’s what you said. I’m waiting on an actual response. “Because a law exists that precludes this. This law has not (yet) been challenged on a constitutional basis and is therefor in force. Hard to imagine this needs to be explained to an American. Do you not understand how things work in your country?” I’m just curious. Do you still jump regularly and what’s your home DZ?
-
I’m pretty sure not too. Because the current view isn’t what the Constitution says. Hence, the discussion on the constitutionality. Roe v. Wade wasn’t constitutional either. Therefore, it’s been aborted.
-
You made the assertion, but didn’t answer the question.
-
Which law precludes this? I’m not a lawyer.
-
Here was one of Levin’s points: Diplomats, students, etc., here on visas (legal) have children here? Are those children now citizens of the US? If not, why not, compared to the children of individuals who come here illegally?
-
Jurisdiction, with what the original author intended, refers to political allegiance and the foreign government’s jurisdiction over that person. It’s got nothing to do with whether a person commits a crime or is tried in a foreign country.
-
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
-
Perhaps watch the topic of conversation before discounting it?
-
Constitutionality of “birthright” citizenship. Stay focused.
-
So on which points concerning the constitutionality of “birthright” citizenship do you disagree with Levin?
