masterrig

I'going to be busy that day. Thanks, anyhow. Y'all have fun! Chuck

O.K. Chuck

Yup! As often as we see fit! Chuck

What the hell... It all reek to me!! I think you're just trollin', now. Chuck

I don't think shiftless and lazy mean what you think they mean. Come on DD you actually USED to have viable points, even if the subject was as irrelevant as this one is. Matt They're kinda like horse-flies... they just buzz around and drive us nuts and not serving any purpose at all. Chuck

Wrong Answer! Their objective, if you can call it that is that of hand-outs and gimme-gimmee and putting forth absolutely no effort to take care of themselves or be a productive part of society. If, as you say, that Obama is in support of their activity then you aren't helping Obama one bit. The 1%er's, as you refer to them, worked for their wealth and invested in the businesses and corporations of this country. To me, there is absolutely no defense for the actions of the occupiers and that's my last word on the matter. Chuck

You just keep copying and pasting someone elses statements and even they are void of anything truly positive. You refuse to respond to any questions by various posters here. Call it what you want, the occupiers are nothing but shiftless bums leeching off society too lazy to help themselves. I have no use for anyone like that. Chuck

You mea, theparens won't just 'text' him? Chuck

Leaderless and dis-organized beggars!! You are all just envious that someone else has more than you! I say, get-off your dead butts and do something productive like... work! You'll be surprised how much farther you'll get! edit to add: I take it, that skydivin' videographer job didn't work-out? Chuck

Near as I can tell, the 'occupiers' are nothing but a bunch of dead-beat bums looking for a hand-out when they should be looking for a job! Wanting someone else to 'give' them what they should be working for. Just more entitlement bull-crap! Chuck

I'm a big fan of Jim Leyland. I really don't like seeing he and his team doing badly. I think the problem with the Tigers is, they had too much time off between the ALCS and the World Series. The Giants hadn't slowed down and kept their momentum up. The Tigers have looked sluggish. The only one who has really shown any pep is Jackson, the Tiger's center fielder. The Giants are on a roll and I can see the end of the series after tonight's game. I do hope, the contract offer for Leyland is still good after tonight, like the Tigers have said. Chuck

I'm wondering if, the little seat on his bike had something to do with it. Chuck

But... but... I didn't even enter! I just can't handle cheaters, thieves or liars. Chuck

He's just another cheating, arrogant jerk. Chuck

Same here! My dad had a Winchester model 1912, 12-guage that when you racked a shell into the chamber, it would fire. He took the time to teach me about each gun in the house. I wouldn't go near that 12-guage! The bottom line here is, if parents are going to have guns in the house, take the time and teach their kids about those guns and proper handling of them. Take the kids to a range or other safe place and let them shoot the guns. Granted, we have the right to keep and bear arms but just do it right. I believe, that would do away with a lot of the problems of kids and guns. Chuck

A-men!! Today, people don't really know how to fend for themselves. I'm sure, this will draw some flack but it's true. People, out of one side of their mouths say they want less government intrusion in their lives. When they have a problem, they want the government to do something. It's nuts!

I don'tknow if it was legal or not, when I was a kid. My parents knew they could trust me. He also informed me of what to do, should someone try to break-in. We just understood each other. Chuck

Of course I'm glad the girl is alive, but your argument is based on emotion. Damn, my comments have been short enough thus far--the least you could do is read them before replying. What part of saying that parents are capable of teaching and kids are capable of learning proper handling of firearms is emotional? Even before I was 12 I knew where my dad kept the 1911 and I knew how to use it. You know what happened? Nothing. So whose argument gets shot to shit just by that example? Not mine. I think the greater good is that no child should ever be left alone with a loaded gun. Viva la difference. Times are sure different, today. WhenI was a kid, my folks would leave me alone and there were guns in the house, primarily for hunting. My dad showed me all about them and I got to shoot each one under his supervision. I never gave them a second thought when they were home or away. The story in this thread can be 'what-iffed' all day long. what happened happened. To me, the girl did the right thing and saved her own life. Also, I get the idea she knew how to handle the pistol in her hands. You can bet your last dollar, someone will come along and file a lawsuit. What is lacking in this country is common sense. Just a little too much knee-jerk though. Chuck

Her Mama told her right! The girld did good and Im glad she's O.K. Chuck

Very good question. Why has only New York sued? Chuck

Seems odd that if 'stop and frisk' is so bad that the ACLU hasn't complained. I'm not saying that all cops ar good, that's naive. All I'm saying is that it's wrong to generalize. There's good and bad in everything. Chuck

Maybe, the officer has an eye for the obvious!? To bundle all law enforcement officers under one category because of the actions of a small number of officers is totally ignorant and absolutely lacking in common sense. Chuck I wouldn't call 10 on 1 a small number. You're twisting things again... nothing new there!! I was talking about ALL law enforcement officers compared to a very, very few bad cops. Your generalities don't hold water. Trying to make one incident look like the way all cops are is just silly. That's what you are trying to do and I'm not buying it. Chuck This is two 'incidents' out of many hundreds. Name 'em!! Along with frequency of incidences. You want to bunch-up all cops as 'bad' show us the proof. An incident here or there does not cover all cops. Chuck Hundreds does though... Hundreds of what? Just the old 'duck and dodge' routine, again. I should've known. Have a nice day! Chuck

Maybe, the officer has an eye for the obvious!? To bundle all law enforcement officers under one category because of the actions of a small number of officers is totally ignorant and absolutely lacking in common sense. Chuck I wouldn't call 10 on 1 a small number. You're twisting things again... nothing new there!! I was talking about ALL law enforcement officers compared to a very, very few bad cops. Your generalities don't hold water. Trying to make one incident look like the way all cops are is just silly. That's what you are trying to do and I'm not buying it. Chuck This is two 'incidents' out of many hundreds. Name 'em!! Along with frequency of incidences. You want to bunch-up all cops as 'bad' show us the proof. An incident here or there does not cover all cops. Chuck

Maybe, the officer has an eye for the obvious!? To bundle all law enforcement officers under one category because of the actions of a small number of officers is totally ignorant and absolutely lacking in common sense. Chuck I wouldn't call 10 on 1 a small number. You're twisting things again... nothing new there!! I was talking about ALL law enforcement officers compared to a very, very few bad cops. Your generalities don't hold water. Trying to make one incident look like the way all cops are is just silly. That's what you are trying to do and I'm not buying it. Chuck

Maybe, the officer has an eye for the obvious!? To bundle all law enforcement officers under one category because of the actions of a small number of officers is totally ignorant and absolutely lacking in common sense. Chuck