masterrig

Members
  • Content

    15,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by masterrig

  1. _________________________________ When I post, I picture all the other posters in their underwear... it makes me feel more comfortable! Chuck
  2. ________________________________ I can understand it from Walt... he's just a 'wild and crazy guy!" But... your sister? Chuck
  3. ________________________________________ That's the damned truth! I usually, try to 'contain' myself. Sometimes, things just strike me the wrong way. Take care of yourself and I appreciate it! Chuck
  4. ______________________________________ I don't know. I guess, I'm just not 'up to it' today. Seemed to me, words were getting twisted around and... just ain't worth it. Chuck
  5. ______________________________ You too, Big Guy! Chuck
  6. __________________________________ You guy's did real good! 'Proud papa' shows... big-time! Chuck
  7. Where did he say that? You're the one that equated getting stopped for an obscured plate with "the nice cop pawing through your underwear drawer". Tone down the hyperbole a bit and say what you mean to say. __________________________________________ I think, it's trolling, at it's worst! Ya' think? Chuck
  8. __________________________________________ I have no problem with that! This type of thing, happens in my house, quite often! Oh, did I mention... my wife is a certified peace officer? Chuck You're a living 4th violation!!! Is she actually a working cop, or ???? Anyway, you get the point; freedom from unwarranted searches is SUPPOSED to be the cornerstone to our so-called freedoms. ______________________________________ Yes, she is a working cop! 3-yrs. Highway Patrol officer, Texas Department of Public Safety, 17-yrs. Sgt. Detective on our Sheriff's dept. Presently, Felonies Investigator District Attorney's Office! Is that 'working cop' enough for you? Besides, who are you? You have nothing in your profile to give anyone a clue. I don't care to respond to you any further and that's my last word on the matter. Chuck
  9. Then you have no objection that the fine, fine officer wants to go thru your wife’s panty drawer, thru your garage, thru your personal papers….. After all, you have nothing to hide. __________________________________________ I have no problem with that! This type of thing, happens in my house, quite often! Oh, did I mention... my wife is a certified peace officer? Chuck
  10. I don't think it's dumb for a cop to be able to read what State a license plate is from, so they can trace it. However, if it's used as an excuse to abuse people for other reasons, then that will need to be slapped down in court. Simple solution: Remove the license plate frame, and remove the cop's excuse! ________________________________ Well said! Chuck Oh really? All things are fixed in court, huh? It takes decades sometimes to fix things and many things go unfixed. Appellate courts are wayyyyyy over spoken. Then the right complkans about liberal appellate courts, the one that fix these issues. This isn;t a case of license plate frame rights, it's a case of wrongful, unreasonable search. _________________________________________ What's wrong with it? The officer would be well within his rights to make the stop according to the law if, he cannot 'plainly read the license plate. Some frames I've seen partially hide letters and numbers. Also, who said anything about "all things are fixed in court"? Also, with everyone bitchin' and squawkin' about 'petty' stops, I don't think too many cops are going to flagrantly misuse the law. Is a license plate frame that damned important as to get a ticket for it? I don't know where you are from but, that's the way it is here in Texas! Chuck Don't bring legislation in as a defense. It was illegal in 16 states for people of different racs to marry up unil 1968. In many states open and notorious cohabitation is still against the law. W/o researchng it, you alluded to it. Hang on...... Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahhaahahhahahahhaahha..... ok, I'm better now. Uh, the exclusionary rule was designed to DISUADE POLICE MISCONDUCT. Meaning, if the dirty cop gets planted or illegallly seized evidence in and it's discovered, no conviction. If the dirty piece of garbage succeeds, congratulations, another innocent guy framed. Point is: the exclusionary rule was designed to DISUADE POLICE MISCONDUCT. No, the facade is that we have rights to privacy, which means not being summarily stopped w/o cause. The illegal stop then leads to the discovery of evidence, which is what the issue is. If we gave cops carte blanche to kick in doors, we would have less crime, but we would have zero security and privacy. The issue is where we think is prudent to draw the line. Understand that there comes a point to where the cops, the ones supposedly stopping crime are the ones creating it, and I think we passed that in the 80's. ___________________________________________ I think, you're making a mountain out of a mole-hill. What the hell co-habitation has to do with it is beyond me. It's a license plate frame. I've got bigger things to concern myself with. Besides, I've got nothing to hide and you have no idea how little I care about it. Chuck
  11. You'd fit in well in the UK. ____________________________________ Ya' think? I can see getting all worked-up about something important but... a license plate frame? Chuck
  12. I don't think it's dumb for a cop to be able to read what State a license plate is from, so they can trace it. However, if it's used as an excuse to abuse people for other reasons, then that will need to be slapped down in court. Simple solution: Remove the license plate frame, and remove the cop's excuse! ________________________________ Well said! Chuck Oh really? All things are fixed in court, huh? It takes decades sometimes to fix things and many things go unfixed. Appellate courts are wayyyyyy over spoken. Then the right complkans about liberal appellate courts, the one that fix these issues. This isn;t a case of license plate frame rights, it's a case of wrongful, unreasonable search. _________________________________________ What's wrong with it? The officer would be well within his rights to make the stop according to the law if, he cannot 'plainly read the license plate. Some frames I've seen partially hide letters and numbers. Also, who said anything about "all things are fixed in court"? Also, with everyone bitchin' and squawkin' about 'petty' stops, I don't think too many cops are going to flagrantly misuse the law. Is a license plate frame that damned important as to get a ticket for it? I don't know where you are from but, that's the way it is here in Texas! Chuck
  13. hey Chuck, when we can rent it for a buck, I'm in! If you and me and eigth other people watch it together, we'll have fun and only spend 10 cents apiece. Bet it's worth that much! Not only that, bet we can come up with a drinking game to it! ________________________________ I'm there, doodette! Chuck
  14. I don't think it's dumb for a cop to be able to read what State a license plate is from, so they can trace it. However, if it's used as an excuse to abuse people for other reasons, then that will need to be slapped down in court. Simple solution: Remove the license plate frame, and remove the cop's excuse! ________________________________ Well said! Chuck
  15. _____________________________________ Why, regret posting them? Those are great pictures! Thanks, for sharing. Chuck I'm sure he's weary of the "dude your daughters HOT" ooogling type of response... g __________________________________ You're probably right. There's a bunch of sick puppies around these parts! Chuck
  16. Look at it this way. This law, gives the police a way of stopping someone for possibly, other 'things'. Like the crack-pipe or baggie full of dope on the front seat in 'plain view'. The broken tail-light thing has been over done. The way I see it, you follow the rules... you've got nothing to worry about. Chuck
  17. _____________________________________ Why, regret posting them? Those are great pictures! Thanks, for sharing. Chuck
  18. I didn't read the book because, I thought, I'd wait for the movie. After the reviews here, I think, I'll just keep my money. Chuck
  19. Nope! Only saw it done in a strip club! Chuck
  20. He's soon to be the subject of an episode of 'South Park'! Chuck
  21. _____________________________ Hey, You! sonofabitch get over here? You come when I call! You'll eventually call him one of the above! Chuck
  22. I disagree. I feel about Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell the same way that I feel about Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Oh, they may have entered the ministry for altruistic reasons when they were young men; but each of them have devolved into shameless, unabashed self-promoters and self-aggrandizers. So no, I don't think -- at this stage of their lives or careers -- their main motivation is to make the world a better place. I think their main motivation is to promote and benefit themselves and advance their careers (to the extent any of them really has a "career"). I feel bad that good clergy might get painted with the same broad brush as these nitwits. ________________________________ Al Sharpton turned 'religous' to avoid a drug charge! I don't think, their objective is to make the world a better place but, to better their own personal agendas. I think... I'll make a sammich! All this talk of sammiches! Chuck
  23. We cashed in the cans at the end of the summer at the local recycling center, and immediately used the new funds to buy more beer. Zipp0 _____________________________________ Isn't that the idea behind 'Re-cycling? Chuck
  24. Bacon & eggs in the skillet and fresh coffee on an early morning! Chuck
  25. ___________________________________ The good stuff!