jclalor

I'd think it might make a kid a bit scared of needles. My experience is that the more shots a child receives, the more comfortable they are getting them. Look at diabetic kids. Kids fear the unknown.

In the 8 years under Bush, the stock market lost 19% Under Obama it's up over 30% Corporate profits last year were the highest ever and yet we are told they are not making enough money to create jobs with out a tax cut. What planet are you from. You do realize their have been revolutions over a lot less in wealth transfers through out the ages. You have a very convincing argument until it comes to the facts. What was it that Bush said 'full me twice shame on me, full me once...

I'm more than happy to reply, Lets say 10 people were awarded damages for harm done by a vaccine, So what, nothing is perfect. Are you capable of weighing the risk versus the rewards? Look at how many millions of lives have been saved by vaccines, and yet people like you cling to the tiniest of percentage points where something went wrong. I guess you undergo zero medical procedures, some people drop dead just from getting their blood drawn. If you want to live in fear and not get vaccinated as an adult, you go knock yourself out. When you force your beliefs on children that have no choice, that should be a crime. you should really study about herd immunity, when you don't vaccinate your children, you put my children's life in danger of a hiddious death.

The good thing about Alzheimer's is your constantly meeting new people.

I took his reply to someone who was stating that it is a disease of the old and that he disagreed. Ron then replied that it was an early onset disease that started at the age of 40-60.

Completely false. 95% occurs after the age of 65, less that 1% before the age of 50. http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.asp

Comparing the two isn't really worth while. They're both bad presidents. I agree, but contrasting Obama and Bush doesn't make Obama look as bad. You still fail to grasp my basic premise, Cutting taxes on the wealthy did not and does not create jobs. It did not work under Bush, it's not working for Obama. We are now told that of course there are no jobs, you have to cut federal regulations.

What kind of economy did bush come into office with? Now what about Obama? Obama still has another possible six years to turn it around. Compare Bush with any other President besides someone who is still in office. So what your saying in a round about way is, thank god for Obama, now bush is not the worse in history.

You are really struggling on this one. Obama has not yet completed his first term. Even if he finishes with crappy numbers, he is using the same tax rate as bush (In reality even lower taxes than Bush) So I ask again, where are all the jobs with this low tax rate. Just for shits and giggles, go see how many Jobs Clinton and Reagan created with a much higher tax rate.

Dude, your tiring me out. I tell you that despite providing large tax breaks for the wealthy, under the pretense that lots of jobs will be created by all these wealthy people flush with cash, few were created. You show me that Bush did create jobs, I agree. the part you seem to be missing is that number of jobs he created are the lowest of any modern day President. I say that the tax cuts did not create the number of promised jobs. If Bush would have said "approve my tax cut bill and I will create the least amount of jobs in modern history" What do you think the response would be? You can stick your head in the sand all you like, But the WSJ had it right. Google "jobs created by President" and then go stick your head in the sand some more. When I say that Bush created the least amount of jobs of any President, you just showing me the figures of what Bush did are worthless. you need to compare him to the others.

Your dodging the question. Where are the jobs that should have been created (your theory) with the hundreds of billions of dollars that were saved by the wealthy over the last ten years? Did you forget when Bush took office? why are you only showing the numbers from half way through June 2001? I never said that he did not create any jobs, just the least of any modern day President. My link from Wiki worked fine to the Department of Labor, they even have ALL of the numbers on Bush. Why would the WSJ lie about Bush? Here are the CPS figures. June 2001: 136,873,000 people employed January 2008: 146,407,000 people employed Increase over about six and a half years: 9,534,000 people. Here's bonus information to your question: January 2008: 146,407,000 people employed February 2010: 138,698,000 people employed Decrease over about two years: 7,709,000 people Here's reality, Bush created the fewest jobs of any modern President. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms Here's some bonus material, from that infamous left wing rag, the Wall street journal http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

Your dodging the question. Where are the jobs that should have been created (your theory) with the hundreds of billions of dollars that were saved by the wealthy over the last ten years? Here are the CPS figures. June 2001: 136,873,000 people employed January 2008: 146,407,000 people employed Increase over about six and a half years: 9,534,000 people. Here's bonus information to your question: January 2008: 146,407,000 people employed February 2010: 138,698,000 people employed Decrease over about two years: 7,709,000 people Here's reality, Bush created the fewest jobs of any modern President. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms Here's some bonus material, from that infamous left wing rag, the Wall street journal http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/ Even more. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/14/more-jobs-might-be-create_n_576310.html

If your a fan of Apocalypse now, this doc is a must see. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD1jkBL6NwA

So who's the idol you're curious about? That was pretty bone head, but I have been up for about 30 hours.

Nothing worse than a deadbeat teabagger Congressman that can fuck and make babies but can't support them. What a low life, he can't even be bothered to show up to court. He claimed his vote in congress was too important to show up for the child support hearing. How did he vote? present. http://www.suntimes.com/news/7656284-417/judge-scolds-rep-joe-walsh-in-child-support-case-with-ex-wife.html

Your dodging the question. Where are the jobs that should have been created (your theory) with the hundreds of billions of dollars that were saved by the wealthy over the last ten years?

Where are all the jobs that should have been created by the Bush tax cuts? In over ten years since the tax cuts, you would thing if that theory held water, we would have all types of jobs. The only thing that happened was the gap widened between the wealthy and the working class.

Aside from one fradulent study where the doctor was profiting from the finding, no one else can find a link between autism and immunizations. They can't all be in the pocket of big pharma. You can't rely solely on the observations of emotional parents. The CDC disagrees with you. (I take it that neither you nor Bill read this previous link). Perhaps you should look at the CDC's own site. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm Funny how they removed the mercury from vaccines and what was the result? autism rates soared. (well at least what constituted a diagnostic of autism did) Just in California last year, several babies died of whooping cough. These babies had been vaccinated, but because others did not vaccinate, their babies died. Have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8yUSV4oqoU&feature=related All the anti-vaccine nuts can go fuck themselves.

Dubya don't seem to be travelling overseas much these days. http://www.alternet.org/world/149855/george_bush_can't_travel_overseas_for_fear_of_arrest_and_prosecution

Funny and yet so true. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIpLd0WQKCY

An old friend of mine wrote a screenplay that was based on his Grandmother. (His mother is Congresswoman Barbara Lee of California) If you have ever been involved with a family member suffering from Alzheimers, it's a pretty good flick. http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800253730/info

Noah lived to be 900 years old.

I would think the child of a Bachmann supporter, having some type of retarded mental growth is completely plausible.

Such a caring Christian. Since this is a kind of death does that mean euthanasia is okay for alzheimer's patients? I was tempted to ask; "What would Jesus do?" then I realized that 2000 years ago, an Alzheimers sufferer would probably be stoned to death for being filled with evil spirits. The right always has the most peculiar "In defense of marry" philosophy. "How is your Wife's battle with alzheimers going Pastor Jones ?" "I have no idea, the divorice was final 6 months ago." I hope Robertson never retires.

Just out of idol curiosity, do you care to share what you do like?