davjohns

Ah. I didn't know that was the case. No reason discussing it, then. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Interesting. In his Habeas Corpus appeal to the SCOTUS, Wilson's attorney only addresses the MR. He even uses the fact that Wilson admitted the crime as evidence of the MR. The Petition specifically states that Wilson was one of multiple perpetrators. I recommend you take the attorney's lead and go back to the MR argument. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

OK. It appears you've given up on the argument that he is retarded. I'll now research your new argument. The article I read said it was his wife and two others, but it might have just been the Ex like you say. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

http://www.ktxs.com/news/RV-Park-witness-shooter-Vic-Stacy-recounts-shoot-out-with-gunman/-/14769632/15933066/-/3v7gsnz/-/index.html I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Donnie Iris I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Try not to move before I get to Belgium next month. I need you to tell me where to jump. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I don't want anyone telling me how to have sex. So, I don't tell them. Very simple. When my son came out to the family, he complained that I wasn't supportive of him. I asked him how I was supposed to do that. I pointed out that he had the room above mine and I never heard him cheering me on when his mother and I were coupling. He seemed to think being gay gave him some special entitlement from others. I told him it made no difference to me one way or the other. I didn't try to raise him to be like me. I tried to raise him to enjoy his life, aid others where he could and not harm anyone else. I don't see why the way someone chooses to have sex or with who is anyone else's business. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Since that article was CNN, I did some more research. It appears the only test that showed him mentally deficient was later discounted based on multiple other tests that showed otherwise. The guy was married, convicted twice of burglary, had spent time in prison, was dealing drugs, and was convicted of beating, kidnapping and murdering the guy that set him up on his latest drug charges. Just a few irrelevant facts that CNN accidentally missed. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/texas-executes-marvin-wilson-claims-iq-article-1.1131326?pgno=1 The same defense attorney who is proclaiming the guy retarded also claims a white guy really committed the murder. The dead guy had a hair from a caucasian on him. Of course, the fact that the convicted guy confessed everything to his wife and two others is also ignored. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I've had bodyarmor since 1991 for various reasons. The guy's actions are clearly suspicious in the extreme and I applaud the cop at the theater. Not sure how they got a warrant to search his home, though. Not sure why he thought he needed the extra magazines or what the plethora of knives were for. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Looked up skydiving in Huntsville, AL. 800-615-9754. I got Adventure Outdoors. Related? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Ah, yes. More sexual tension between two of our forumites. The air is rife with it. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

TTIWWP I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

OK, sorry if I misidentified the poster. Since you two were the ones I saw bickering at the end, I thought it was always you two. I might have been looking at a series of quotes that didn't identify who they were from. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I looked back over the thread. It looks to me as if you have twisted things around. You indicated that someone was a homophobe filled with hate. He disagreed. You then turned that into him actively promoting inequality. He said he wasn't doing that. You then asked how doing so was not bigotted. You've been twisting his comments at every exchange. I'm not surprised he quit responding. Please go back and read the exchange again. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm concerned. Don't lots of farmers have more than one tractor? Why do you need more than one tractor for farm defense? Why do you need an assault tractor? Clearly this guy had mental problems. How do we keep tractors out of the hands of mentally disturbed people? I think a mule and a plow is enough for farm defense. These new automatic tractors are just not for civilian use. Anyone who wants a tractor around must be scared of something. Its purely an emotional response. If something needed plowed, the government can handle it. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Butters. DaVinci. Get a room. The sexual tension is stiffling. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I haven't really had an opinion in the whole issue of defining marriage to this point. I've thought about it, and here's what I've come up with. Marriage might very well be a religious institution. Let religions have it. Just understand that there are some religions and Christian denominations that have no problem marrying same-sex couples. So, everyone has an avenue to claim they are married. Now, government has no business in this sector. I think that the US, today, has eliminated the inequalities of gender that once justified government intervention in dissolution of marriages. So, if people want some form of civil union, they should put it in a contract. When they choose to end that contract, they can petition a civil court over any disputes resulting. That gives the government jurisdiction over the civil issues of an intended long-term relationship and gives churches jurisdiction over marriage. Churches can be petitioned for the religious divorce / annulment and government can decide the division of property, financial obligations and such in accorance with the civil contract entered into. Does that solve the problem? I think Catholics pretty much already see it this way. You can only be 'married' in Catholocism if both parties are Catholic and the church performs the wedding. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Kind of what I expect will be happening today. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm in the bible belt. The news reported the Chik Fil A's in the area had lines they couldn't service on the support day. If people are really occupying the business to protest, I expect there will be problems and people will go to jail. That should bring publicity, but not good for the homosexual rights people. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

A few simple rules: Congress, the Senate and the POTUS will receive no pay in any year in which they do not deliver a budget before 1 Oct or any year in which said budget is not balanced. Congress, the Senate and the POTUS shall receive no pay increases of any sort in any year in which there is a national debt. Every member of Congress and the Senate shall send their first born child or closest next-of-kin who is fit for military duty to serve in any military expedition authorized or funded by said bodies. The POTUS shall personally lead such military expeditions directed by him. In his absence, the Vice President shall assume duties as the POTUS. You get the idea. The people who create the problems should feel the pain. Passing laws that don't effect you just leads to all kinds of hooliganism. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

How the uninformed will decide the election Between the uninformed and the misinformed, the remaining percentage of voters has little chance of effecting an election. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I guess Libertarians aren't too concerned about whether people out there are having fun or not? I just want others to not muck up MY fun. I would certainly like it if they are having fun as well, I just don't want to make it mandatory one way or the other. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Oh, good. If you've got your foot in your mouth, I'm pretty sure I didn't do anything with you that I'll see on youtube later. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Oh I think both sides are guilty of that. Isn't the act of carrying a gun often driven by the emotion of feeling safer? I can't say for others. For me, it's another piece of emergency equipment. I have flashlights, fire extinguishers, knives, first aid kits, etc. at home, in cars, and office. My uniform always has a penlight, knife and pen in the sleeve. If someone is stopped on the side of the road, I stop to help. I can't be much help without the right equipment. A pistol is just another piece of equipment. When I go kayaking, it's a stainless .22 magnum on a caribiner for wild animals. When I skydive, I have a prepaid disposable cell in my bicep pocket in case I land out. When I'm mountain biking, it's a tube repair kit. I try to be prepared for what I might encounter. Most often, my emergency supplies are used in taking care of someone else. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I encountered marijuana for the first time when I found the baggie on the guy I was arresting. I can't recall ever encountering drugs when I wasn't arresting someone for them. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.