Butters
-
Content
4,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by Butters
-
Obesity may push U.S. health costs above Europe: study
Butters replied to masterblaster72's topic in Speakers Corner
In normal Democratic logic, the Fat-Tax is likely, but it would involve taxing thin and athletic people and giving the money to fat people - which they would use to buy cake. As the fat get fatter, Dems would increase the tax as the obvious solution. In normal Republican logic, the capital crime would be implemented, but never inforced. Except on Congressmen in their own party - for the purposes of PR. And Neo-Conservatives will call fat the new terror and will begin to secretly add fat to food causing more people to become fat which will lead to the war on fat which will allow the Neo-Conservatives to spy on us all! Edit: Sorry, I couldn't help myself. I think I'm having an out-of-brain day today. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
Fixed it for you. (I enjoyed the majority of episodes.) "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I don't want a motorcycle. I wanted a vespa. I understand but a Kawasaki Ninja 250R out performs a Vespa in every area (price, mpg, 0-60, etc...) and you are just as likely to get hurt or killed on a Vespa as you are a Kawasaki Ninja 250R.
-
Which Pants & Jacket color combination do you like? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Yes. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I don't want a motorcycle. I wanted a vespa. I understand but a Kawasaki Ninja 250R out performs a Vespa in every area (price, mpg, 0-60, etc...) and you are just as likely to get hurt or killed on a Vespa as you are a Kawasaki Ninja 250R. Don't forget to wear a helmet, gear, and smile (yes, a smile is important)!
-
You should have purchased a Kawasaki Ninja 250R. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
In a (near) perfect system ... Justice: If an individual can be rehabilitated then incarceration, if an individual can not be rehabilitated then capital punishment. Revenge: Never, an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Is posting in the Women's Forum while drinking Tequlia smart or not?
Butters replied to ZigZagMarquis's topic in The Bonfire
If you are like me when drinking Tequlia ... not smart. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
If you are a cop that doesn't give other cops tickets ... then don't expect me to respect you when you are giving me a ticket. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Japanese Slow Motion Food Fight "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Ultimate Revenge On Ex Video "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
... and I almost won the lottery. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I didn't think it was funny (probably because of my age) ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Besides that, the feng shui is all wrong More of the same ... military and (wasteful) spending. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Just copying and pasting. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
S. African bishop: Condoms tainted with AIDS More of the same ... religious and ignorance. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
What languages do you know? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
What about the people in the minority that are born in Iran and are unable to move out of Iran ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Irony score well off the scale Did you fail to read or comprehend the post? There is nothing ironic about it. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
You use one of the broadest brushes in Speakers Corner ... Why don't you actually attempt to read and comprehend what I (and others) write for once. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Care to explain? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I don't know, why? (From other posts you appear to be against everything the U.S. does to prevent avowed enemies from acquiring the means to murder millions of U.S. citizens.) "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Like I stated earlier ... I posed the statement and questions not because I believe the statement but because someone posed the statement and questions to me and I was looking for other opinions. Ok, let's assume the wealth that is donated, spent, etc... by the rich goes to the poor. Your argument for the rich not donating, spending, etc... their wealth to the poor is because the poor will not maintain it? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Uhm,..you do know that he was taking the piss out of Australians and not Americans in that clip,.. don't you? Several people just didn't get it. Maybe the thread title IS appropriate Ok, ok, I get it. The combination of your thread title (causing assumptions) and lack of attention lead to ... me being stupid. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch