georgerussia

I do it with those who do it themselves. So far I have seen several cases when your statements were proven untrue, and you never admitted anything - you typically just disappear from the thread completely. Even in the case I pointed directly you didn't admit anything. Do it yourself first, then ask others to do so. The situation is exactly the same for you, even if you - as usual - would not admit that. Again, I don't care what you think about me so you're wasting your time. And, by the way, sending me a "You are a sniveling little lying coward" private message, and then blocking the replies from me was indeed very brave act of you! Speaks a lot about integrity of one's character. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Watch yourself. Applying the same rule to you (no, you're not extempted), this means your credibility has been already lost earlier. You are even in a worse situation, because your claim has been proven false using the reliable source, and my claim has not been proven false yet (and by the nature of this claim it cannot be proven false as nobody is going to examine all your posts). I'm doing what you are doing, not what you are saying. Isn't that fair? So either put up or shut up, or shut up about putting up or shutting up. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

You're probably new to Speaker Corner or to gun threads, as most if not all recent gun threads ended up in a similar way :) It's hard to expect anything else though, as pro-gun look pretty much as Christians - they have their mantra they believe in, which others (like non-Christians) simply cannot understand how a grown up adult may believe in that despite all the facts shown. So basically every gun or religion thread is expected to end like that. Gun threads are more aggressive though. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

I have a link, but I will not post it until you claim you didn't say anything which can be considered like that. Indeed - someone who is debating honestly, wouldn't make stuff up like gun crime in UK which keeps skyrocketing, while Home Office statistics said exactly the opposite. Does that also mean that you already discredited yourself, and shall just go crawl back under your rock and shut up? Or you belong to the majority of Republicans whose motto is "do as I say, not as I do"? Well, forum already seen virtually anyone screwing up - and this included you too. Nevertheless, I don't really care what pro-gun types think about me - you already made your opinion, and nothing is going to change it. Same with me - I have made my opinion as well, and no pro-gun reply will change it (because most of your arguments are just silly). So, as I said before, you will vote your opinion, and I will vote mine, and we will see who will prevail. That simple. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Before I start searching through your 13K posts I'd like to make sure you won't back up by saying something like "one case does not count" or "I did not mean that", or just ignore it completely as you did with British crime rates. So unless you say something like "I have never said anything like that, or what can be considered like that by a reasonable person", there is no reason to even start that search. You must be kidding. If I were like you, I would just say that you cannot prove that you didn't say it either, so we're square. Using the same criteria you have already lost your credibility when you told us about gun crime rates going up in UK, while the Home Office records showed that the crime rate is actually going down. Correct? Nobody speaks the truth, except imaginable Jesus. Everyone speaks their opinion, and their agenda. Yes, this includes you too. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

And he is the only one who can ask me to prove it. You cannot. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

I want to hear his answer, and until I hear it, you won't get any. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Should I take it as that you never said such thing, and therefore gun owners do not arrest criminals committing crimes? * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

In your dreams. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

It has been answered above. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Should have said "This was an answer, but not the one I would like to see, so I pretended to ignore it by claiming it as evasion". * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

This is an answer. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Ask JohnRich, he mentioned criminals being arrested by gun carrying individuals. Therefore I assume it should be possible in some way, as other allegedly did that. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

One should have tried really hard to lose invested money during last year. Even I, having very little knowledge about investing (and incentive to), made a nice amount just by purchasing some index funds last Feb-Mar. Is it nice? Sure it is. But does it qualify for any kind of bonus? No way. Nope. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

You should have invested last year; some of us made really nice "bonuses" for themselves. And no, I do not work for Wall Street. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Well, we're paying _more_ in taxes because we're married (several thousands just for last year, to be specific), so taxing everyone at a single rate would be actually a tax break for us. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Sounds like an ad run by starter pistol manufacturers :) My guess is that thieves would have no issues as long as they do not steal the gun :) * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

You do see the difference between turning a criminal to police (and thus preventing further crime), and calling the police after the criminals already left (so no further crime is prevented)? * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Not even close. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

What for? And share the details of what she did? C'mon. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

After the "intruders" (rather peeping Toms) left? * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

I wonder how Hertfordshire Police officers learned about that incident? They monitor her house 24x7? The whole story sounds like a hoax. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Correct. That is why it is a different case out of four those provided by lawrocket. Nope. Everyone also paid for a bunch of other stuff, not related to their own care in any way. For example, we paid for 4M salaries for CEOs. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

It is very unlikely any of them would ever need or listen to your advice. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Funny thing that some time ago Mike admitted it himself, that indeed, Cho should not have been able to buy guns. * Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *