Lucky...

That's news to me! What is Oprah's salary? What does Oprah's makeup artist make? What is Sean Penn's salary? What does his camera man make? So a business owner/manager will recalculate his payroll based on his political affiliation. That's awesome and it's new to me. Listen, you need to trade your vag for a set and head down to the Zimbabwe library. I want to work in fast food.. I need to find out if McDonalds or Wendy's is republican or democrat... you need an education. I'll repeat what I just wrote in teh above thread: WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO WARE THE LEGISLATORS. Simple enough? I don't care what individual residents do regardless of your political affiliation. In a Representative Democracy all we do is elect the boobs who make the real distribution decisions; to me it is just bizzare to think individual citizens really vote party politics with their consumer dollar. We vote best purchase value with our dollar, not usually or at all partisan with our dollar. You might find one obscure example, but we just have little say with our political system as our electors can do what they want, then factor inteh very electoral college and our vote gets even more meaningless. Did you know that the state electors can have given all EV's to the losing president? Back to the point, show me multiple MAJOR examples where consumers vote party politics with their money.

So, if I need to get my oil changed and I can choose between a service center owned by a democrat or a service center owned by a republican, who should I pick? Wrong end, you are the consumer, I was quite obviously talking about legislators and their distribution protocol.

Bill, look, I'm not complaining, I'm not questioning your authority, I'm just asking in an informational aspect as to what I said so whatever I did won't be duplicated. I would appreciate a public response. Please quote what I wrote in this thread that was against the rules.

Not at all, we've shared reasonable discourse, when it gets shitty, I play along; sometimes I start it - sometimes I follow suit. You tend to have more substantive response than most RWers, so that's what ya get back. You must admit most RWers don't have a lot to say, I mean, what can they say? As for stats and polls, yes they can be skewed, which is why methodology is so imprtant.

No sarcasm meant, but pls, what did I write that was not inline with the rules?

Yet, unlike his taxcuts, which you despise, you embrace flooding with work market with several million workers, who's agenda is not the $150,000 cookie cutter house and the suv....You do know that they can come here, for ten years, send their money south, and live like kings, for a long time, right? So, you do think FR did something right. Show me where I've ever advocated an open gate approach. You can't, I'll save you the time. In fact, I've advocated the border wall, so you missed by a mile.

Sorry you're having such comprehension problems - I was saying that your hero has racked up 41% of Bush's total increase in 14% of the time. Put another way, Obama's increase in 419 days took Bush 4 years to do. Can't WAIT to see what the next three years are going to do. Sadly, for you, it is you who has comprehension probs. I fullly understand what you're saying, I agree, the debt has increased 2T under Obama, 41% give-or-take as much as GWB; where was the miscomprehension? I established where the 2T went, who inherited what and so forth, It is those facts that you do not want to touch. Here they are again: The debt has increased 2T under Obama. -- over 1/3 of that is the stimulus which has yeilded great things so far. -- A chunk of that is for your wars -- and the rest is basically greatly, greatly reduced receipts that were well in place as Obama took office; do you need me to reference the pathetic receipts due to GWB's tax cuts coupled with his economic mess in the way of data? Reciepts were down to nothing as GWB left office, that is responsible for most of the debt increase and need to pass stimulus. How was the reciepts picture and budget when your hero took office? Oh yea, there were surplusses everywhere and huge receipts. I broke it down for you, can you argue anything?

Luck's profile name is Dick Johnson I've been found out again.

Spare me, Obama is not an econmoist and neither was Bush. This summer when oil shoots through the flipping roof, your boy is gonna be up there shaking his fist and spewing about how we need to "reign in these greedy oil companies" and "make a gallon of gas affordable for the working family" It;s as if the world is one big game of monopoly and if you're up, Obama wants to punish you, if your down you get bailed out. ugh No, it's about distribution of wealth, you call it punishment, but that's slang. R's distribute it to t eh top, let the corps hand it out as they see fit, the Dems distribute it more evenly. Economically American Capitalism as endeared by the Republicans is most like Communism as far as its distribution; Socialism is more off to the side.

ok. I see your position. I'm just not into blanket generalizations. Then show me examples where teh RW hasn't been lock-stepped. no. because that's not my point. spin that response how you will. But that's not my point. You're apparently into blanket generalizations, and I'm not. You probably also quote polls and statistics. (even though I'm sure you know how easy it is to skew poll and statistics) Right, the RW IS lockstepped which isn't all bad, at least they get more mileage from their representatives than do the Dems. Stats are relevant if viewed objectively, or, better yet, each element is tested seperately as an independent variable.

I'm not saying you, your family or all of Tennessee are insig, I'm saying that if possible data must be: 1) Random 2) Large sample size

Ok - I believe about half of what you wrote here. Or maybe it's one third. I don't care, if you had an argument to make, you would. It must suck to post and never make a point.

Well sure, matching the world dollar for dollar, more with the wars, is the real problem here, not HC funding. We need reform so that doctors making 200k out of med school and RN's making 100k is reduced, this causes the massive costs. I mean, let the hospitals pay docs and RN's that much, but not at the cost of over-inflated HC which causes millions to be out of coverage.

That speaks volumes. Gee, my stock market prediction seems to be exactly right on the money. 6 months ago you called for a market crash, it's only gone stronger and you claim you are a pro stock trader. Maybe I, "cannot believe nothing you have ever said," or typed in this case.

What the fuck I'm talking about is your heroin placing targets on the locations referring to legislators. Then the rally call. Sure, you'll denounce the targets as purely political locations, but all it takes to stir up tea bagging trash is shit like that, that's what the fuck I'm talking about. What a waste of oxygen.... Hardly. Yesterday some tea baggers posted the address of one of our Congressman on their website(actually they got it wrong and posted his brother's address). Someone came by and cut gas lines at his house. Is this the new face of "conservatism"? Apparently it is. The GOP has become the party of "NO", mean spirit, bigotry and no class. Become? As in just yesterday? Try since Harding Coolidge.

Awe, spelling over substance, sounds like it's Ron. Nevermind the issue

What the fuck I'm talking about is your heroin placing targets on the locations referring to legislators. Then the rally call. Sure, you'll denounce the targets as purely political locations, but all it takes to stir up tea bagging trash is shit like that, that's what the fuck I'm talking about. What a waste of oxygen.... They're keystrokes, I didn't say a thing. I wasn't referring to what you were saying. LOL You owe me a cup of coffee and a keyboard!!! Easily amused and distracted http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/909/4215513318bw2.jpg

Please, don't tell him that...I need my daily headshake-face-in-hands dose. Where else does he have to go? Wiki? The Onion? The VA? You're like that comedian doing 10-yer old jokes, perhaps Bob Hope; it shows your empty bag of nothing. BTW, let's talk CNNBC, or do you onlhy work one way - lockstepped? We knew that. No one is lock-stepped with me. I'm simply here to help you maintain the sound foundation of your demeanor upon which you built, all by yourself...because, after all, not everyone appreciates the depth of those sources of information you use... 1) Right, about me not the issues 2) What sources, the BLS, BEA, NBER, etc? The ones you run from?

What the fuck I'm talking about is your heroin placing targets on the locations referring to legislators. Then the rally call. Sure, you'll denounce the targets as purely political locations, but all it takes to stir up tea bagging trash is shit like that, that's what the fuck I'm talking about. What a waste of oxygen.... They're keystrokes, I didn't say a thing. I wasn't referring to what you were saying. Quit being coy, what were you referring to?

Please, don't tell him that...I need my daily headshake-face-in-hands dose. Where else does he have to go? Wiki? The Onion? The VA? You're like that comedian doing 10-yer old jokes, perhaps Bob Hope; it shows your empty bag of nothing. BTW, let's talk CNNBC, or do you onlhy work one way - lockstepped? We knew that.

What the fuck I'm talking about is your heroin placing targets on the locations referring to legislators. Then the rally call. Sure, you'll denounce the targets as purely political locations, but all it takes to stir up tea bagging trash is shit like that, that's what the fuck I'm talking about. What a waste of oxygen.... They're keystrokes, I didn't say a thing.

What the fuck I'm talking about is your heroin placing targets on the locations referring to legislators. Then the rally call. Sure, you'll denounce the targets as purely political locations, but all it takes to stir up tea bagging trash is shit like that, that's what the fuck I'm talking about.

http://www.facebook.com/friends/?id=100000885306386#!/photo.php?pid=3655178&op=1&view=all&subj=373854973434&aid=-1&auser=0&oid=373854973434&id=24718773587 Nice job, Palin, advocating violence has paid off. Nice targets on these legislator's backs.

(more lock-stepped Republicanism) Or hwt's: CNNBC. But you won't bring that in.

Well, if Repubs were in control they would do just that, cut the workforce and tell those who are starving that they're just being whiners. The Dems would create some monstrosity of a gov system that wasn't needed but created jobs and economic stability. The Repubs would scream that their liberty was being torn down, the Dems would just plug along and ensure all were ok. Doesn't this sound like the Great Depression? And the political outcome then was 5 consec terms of Dems, then a great Republican named Eisenhower, then mostly garbage since: Nixon, Reagan. GWB. I think the people forgot about the GD and went with their hearts. But to answer your question, the political structure would remove the garbage, hence no Republicans and put inplace Dems as a compensator.