DanG

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    6,580

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. DanG
    Wait, so now it's not retaliation, it's finishing the job? Get your narrative straight. Or could it be that, like many if not most Americans, you can't tell the difference between Al Qaeda, Iraqis, Afghans, and other scary baddies? - Dan G
  2. DanG
    Retaliation against Iraq? For what? - Dan G
  3. DanG
    During Bush's Presidency, there were people here posting almost verbatim what you just wrote, except they changed the names to the above. I'm not saying I agree with you or posters of the past, but your dislike of Obama doesn't make him evil and more than other poster's dislike of GWB made him evil. - Dan G
  4. DanG
    Do you know what the term 'conservative' means? By definition, it is not conservatives who struggle to change the status quo. - Dan G
  5. DanG
    +1 (Actually, I can think of at least five or six off the top of my head) - Dan G
  6. DanG
    Did you? - Dan G
  7. DanG
    Right back at cha - Dan G
  8. DanG
    Or you can just troll all the time. - Dan G
  9. DanG
    Was it Obama who blocked bringing Gitmo detainees to US soil for trial? No, it was Congress. (BTW, I'm pretty disgusted to Gitmo is still open, but if you think the "liberals" are the driving force keeping it open, you are deluded) People get killed when we're at war. That's got nothing to do with civil rights. Huh? Congress repealed DADT, Obama signed the repeal. Obama stopped enforcing DOMA against the protestation of Congressional Republicans. Was it Obama calling for Tsarnaev to be sent to Gitmo and treated as an enemy combatant? No, it was Senate Republicans. - Dan G
  10. DanG
    Wow. So you truly believe that the NSA isn't really spying on Americans, but Obama has created a false leak that they are just to divert attention from Benghazi? You're getting pretty far out there, man. - Dan G
  11. DanG
    Regarding Ron's theory that the current NSA scandal was engineered to distract people from Benghazi? Yes. - Dan G
  12. DanG
    If they went through all the trouble to engineer a scandal, why would they engineer one that made them look bad? Why not engineer one that makes someone else look bad? Either your theory is completely stupid, or Obama is a genius beyond recognition. - Dan G
  13. DanG
    Huh, I thought the mantra was supposed to be, "I'm against the government picking winners and losers." I guess the mantra changes when it doesn't suit the current argument. - Dan G
  14. DanG
    I just traded in my Prius (with military related license plates that I used to drive to my job developing weapons) for a big fat gas guzzler. Will you be my friend now? - Dan G
  15. DanG
    So why don't you want people to discuss how viable replacements are being developed and fielded? Why don't you want people to discuss the fact that new technologies often take some time to become established in the marketplace? If you just want to post your thoughts on the Chevy Volt without any response, may I suggest you start a blog, and refrain from posted in a discussion forum. - Dan G
  16. DanG
    Seriously? OK, you're against government subsidies for development of electric vehicles, but you're for government fees on electric vehicles. Duh. - Dan G
  17. DanG
    So you're against government interference when it benefits something you don't like, but you celebrate government interference when it hurts something you don't like? I think you fell off your high horse and haven't even realized it yet. - Dan G
  18. DanG
    Do you have a point regarding the sales figures of the Chevy Volt, or do you just have a weird obsession with this particular model for no logical reason? - Dan G
  19. DanG
    Honestly, can you take a second before you hit post and reread what you've written? It is very hard to converse with someone when you have no idea what they're trying to say. - Dan G
  20. DanG
    Nope, but at least I'll own it. I get snarky. Not always, but probably more often than I should. And yeah, you play lip service to being non-partisan, but instead of criticizing the administration, it's always "the left" or "liberals" that you're down on. - Dan G
  21. DanG
    Concur completely. "Hate crimes" are just crimes to me. Anything more and you're getting into the thought police area. I agree. I was making a separate argument against the idea that labeling it terrorism will somehow hurt his cause. Just the opposite, I think it will help his cause. - Dan G
  22. DanG
    Both sides are the same, but I know it's not possible for you to make a post without a partisan dig. This scandal is not about the ability to give money to a cause. It's about the ability to do it tax free and without having to disclose your donors. That's what the organizations investigated by the IRS wanted, not just the ability to operate in the political arena, but to do so while enjoying special tax free status. - Dan G
  23. DanG
    Yes, that's what I'm saying. And I've said it before. The problem is that it will never happen since both sides (not just the left as rushmc seems to think) have pet organizations they will claim are "special". - Dan G
  24. DanG
    Impossible. Unless you get rid of all Federal taxes, they'll always be a need for someone to collect whatever taxes we have on the books. - Dan G
  25. DanG
    If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? - Dan G