regulator

It's incredible to ponder what would be going through this kids head before he shot his teacher and then himself. and yes I mean before the bullet went through his head.

I'm simply saying if you are going to be ok with taking someone else's life dont run away like a little bitch.

For some odd reason, their seems to be a particular segment of our country that despises Obama, no matter what he does. I'm not really sure why that is, I just can't seem to put my finger on it. --------------------------------------------------------- Ohh I know the answer to your stupid question...because anytime anyone who doesn't agree with the president must be RACIST!!! Just man up and say it already.

The kid died anyway. If you are going to fire the first round then man the fuck up and fight to the death.

The issue is most certainly guns, and the lack of enough of them. Why weren't all the other kids armed? They could have shot the bad kid immediately. The solution is a simple one, arm children nationwide. That will check some egos. ---------------------------------------------------------- if this was the case already you would have already shot yourself in the face and there would be no bignugget...then who would I laugh at?

"The student was pointing a gun at the teacher after the teacher told him to put it down, and the student fired a shot at the teacher, and the teacher fell, and everybody ran away," interesting how these kids shoot someone and then run away like little bitches.

I feel another 'for the children' ploy coming soon.

Dude, your odds of having sex with either are exactly the same. If all your doing while watching news is fantasizing about sex, you're probably doing it wrong. -------------------------------------------------------- Who said anything about having sex with either of them? I just said I'd rather watch megyn kelly report biased journalism over some other chick with man-hair reporting equally but opposite { like significantly more} biased journalism.

Lets see...sexy Megyn Kelly or a lesbian with man-hair. Yeah I'll choose Megyn every day and twice on sunday too.

------------------------------------------- I read this was placed in the deal at the last minute or so. Can someone fill me in on why this is bad?

http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/63737924453/video-dave-ramsey-lays-out-the-facts-of-obamacare-for "You’re not exempt from math if you’re a Republican, and you’re not exempt from math if you’re a Democrat."

Here's to being the bigger man than I was. I will say I despise her elitist attitude where she thinks its ok for her to conceal carry but the rest of american including veterans can't be trusted. And no I don't want her to die because of her stance on fireams. But she isn't worthy of coming to the conclusion who does and who doesn't get to defend themselves and their families.

'Sen Dianne Feinstein (D. Cal.) has long been a fanatic gun control advocate. Yesterday, she upped the ante by declarating that all military vets, merely because they are vets, are mentally ill.' This is me still not giving a fuck.

This has gotten to be one of the coolest pieces of furniture I have ever seen. http://tooshocking.com/videos/11988/Hidden_Gun_Compartment

My wife and I keep our insurance providers too, and we are both privately employed. If you work for a scumbag employer, shame on you. I've had insurance through this job for the past 5 years I was employed here. So what constitutes a scumbag employer in your book? Any job that isn't academia?

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2013/10/01/reminder-every-senate-democrat-voted-in-favor-of-exempting-themselves-from-obamacare-n1714217 One of the most profoundly unfair provisions of Obamacare is that members of Congress and their staffers were unilaterally and illegally granted a special exemption from the law they themselves passed. Unlike many Americans, many of whom have been forcibly kicked off their current health care plans, the governing class and their staffers as of now could keep their insurance providers SAY WHAT?

Its absolutely absurd that dems want to be exempt from obamacare. They thought this shit up...they should have to use it just like everyone else.

Washington (CNN) -- Disarray in the Republican-led House wreaked havoc Tuesday on efforts to forge a compromise to end the partial government shutdown and avoid a possible U.S. default this week, with GOP leaders seemingly unable to come up with any plan acceptable to their members. On a day of political drama and confusion, House Republicans first proposed their own version of a Senate plan to temporarily end the political stalemate paralyzing Congress, then haggled among themselves over the details before finally agreeing to vote on it Tuesday night. But shortly after announcing the planned vote, the House committee that sets the rules for such procedures postponed its hearing, putting in doubt the possibility that the full chamber would consider the measure on Tuesday night. Failure by Congress to raise the nation's borrowing limit could trigger the first-ever U.S. default as soon as Thursday. President Barack Obama called for House Republicans to "do what's right" by reopening government and ensuring the United States can pay its bills, telling CNN affiliate WABC that "we don't have a lot of time" to avoid a possible default. If the House proposal eventually passes, it would then go to the Democratic-led Senate for consideration with pressure mounting for a final agreement before financial markets react to the possibility of a first-ever U.S. default. One Wall Street credit rating firm, Fitch, on Tuesday warned of a possible downgrade of gold-plated U.S. bonds, citing risk of default from "political brinkmanship." According to multiple sources, the House plan will call for funding the government through December 15 to end the partial shutdown that entered its third week. It also would increase the federal debt ceiling until February 7. In addition, the House GOP version will include a provision demanded by tea party conservatives that would prohibit federal subsidies for the President, officials in his administration, members of Congress and their respective staff in buying health insurance under Obama's signature health care reforms. Republicans dropped demands to include two other provisions related to Obamacare. One would have delayed a tax on medical devices proponents say is needed to help pay for the Affordable Care Act and the other would have tightened income verification of those seeking subsidies to purchase health insurance. The House proposal also would forbid the Treasury from taking what it calls extraordinary measures to prevent the government from defaulting as cash runs low, in effect requiring hard deadlines to extend the federal debt ceiling. Earlier, sources said House Speaker John Boehner was "struggling" to come up with enough votes to pass the GOP counter-proposal to the Senate plan. After a two-hour caucus meeting that lasted far longer than scheduled, Boehner told reporters there was no final decision on what the GOP-led House would do. In a possible signal that he would proceed on a plan opposed by the GOP tea party conservative wing, Boehner said "the idea of default is wrong and we shouldn't get anywhere close to it." Hours later, GOP sources confirmed that the revised Republican plan would be put to a vote. House Democrats criticized the plan as a reckless attempt to torpedo any chance at compromise. Dems standing firm Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, following a meeting between Obama and House Democratic leaders, signaled her caucus still wanted "clean" proposals to fund the government and raise the debt ceiling. "The bill that they're talking about right now is a bill to default. It's a decision to default. Once they get over that, then we'll see what they send to the floor," she said of Republicans, adding that she remained optimistic Congress would find a path to resolve the matter. Two senior House GOP sources told CNN's Deirdre Walsh that the House GOP counter-proposal would pass in a way that allows the Democratic-led Senate to strip provisions with a simple majority. Walsh and CNN Chief Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash explained that would make it harder for tea party conservatives such as GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas to delay or derail the agreement. The significance of having the House go first became clear later Tuesday when sources in both parties told CNN that senators working on the agreement put their work on hold temporarily as Reid and McConnell waited to see how the House proceeds. Senate leaders from both parties said they were closing in on a deal to temporarily fund the government through January 15 and raise the federal borrowing limit to February 7. Economists warn that failure to raise the debt limit by Thursday could spike interest rates with possible catastrophic impact at home and abroad. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other Democrats immediately slammed the House GOP leadership for what they called a reckless brinksmanship maneuver. "Extremist Republicans in the House of Representatives are attempting to torpedo the Senate's bipartisan progress with a bill that can't pass the Senate," Reid said on the Senate floor. He earlier said he was "confident we will be able to reach a comprehensive agreement this week," reiterating the optimism he expressed Monday night that raised hopes among investors, world leaders and regular Americans that the shutdown stalemate was nearing an end. The White House also rejected the Republican effort. If there's a deal, what next? The halting pace of negotiations began Monday, when the White House canceled a planned meeting with congressional leaders in what was perceived as a move to Reid and his Republican counterpart, Sen. Mitch McConnell, with room to negotiate. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tennessee, said it was time to get a deal done after lengthy delays he blamed on the unrealistic goal set by GOP conservatives of gutting Obamacare. "The fact is we've got to figure out a way to move ahead," he told CNN's "New Day" on Tuesday. "In fairness, on our side of the aisle, we've wasted two months, focused on something that was never going to happen." However, the House GOP decision to offer a counter-proposal promised further delay toward final congressional action on an agreement. Meanwhile, Cruz had a dinner meeting on Monday night with House conservatives to discuss the the emerging Senate deal and how to react, according to a source familiar with the gathering at a Capitol Hill restaurant. The congressional negotiations are being closely watched by other nations, which would also feel the impact should the United States run out of money to pay some of its bills. Jon Cunliffe, who will become the deputy governor of the Bank of England, told British lawmakers over the weekend that banks should begin planning for contingencies. The partial shutdown has proved costly. Hundreds of thousands of federal employees are either idle at home or not being paid while working. And officials warn that tough choices are ahead about which bills to pay and which to let slide, should the shutdown and debt ceiling debate drag on. Belcher: 'Elections actually do have consequences' Sen. Klobuchar: 'We're very, very close' Will Senate deal pass? So far, the standoff has cost the economy about $20 billion in gross domestic product, CNN's Christine Romans reported Tuesday on "New Day," citing Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics. GDP is a measure of the goods and services produced by an economy. http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/15/politics/shutdown-showdown/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Oh please...not another 'for the children' ploy. Get a new line.

------------------------------------------------------------ Do you need a tissue to wipe away your seepage?

http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/03/6011-feinstein-says-veterans-mentally-ill-cant-own-guns/ Sen Dianne Feinstein (D. Cal.) has long been a fanatic gun control advocate. Yesterday, she upped the ante by declarating that all military vets, merely because they are vets, are mentally ill. On that ground alone she insists that vets should be denied any exemption to her extremist gun control bill. Feinstein let slip her true opinion of America’s veterans during a Senate Judiciary committee hearing, when she was asked to discuss a proposed amendment to her pending gun control bill. This amendment would have allowed military veterans to obtain guns that would be banned for other Americans. Feinstein thought this was a terrible idea, because she presumes vets are suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome and are therefore too unstable to be trusted with weapons: …this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was effect… and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States… that included active military. The problem with expanding this is that you know with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this. So you know I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to — if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon. Not only is Feinstein wrong about vets, she’s wrong about PTSD, which she characterizes as a “new phenomenon.” In every war, some returning veterans have suffered delayed reactions. Whether it’s World War I’s “shell shock,” the Vietnam war’s “vet syndrome,” or today’s PTSD, it’s always been out there, and it’s never been a major societal problem. Only a Democrat would pretend that it’s something new and then use it to take away Second Amendment rights from those who have served this country in battle. ----------------------------------------------------- Isn't it interesting when the military is used for her parties political agenda its totally fine for them to be armed but once they are out...well that's a different subject matter altogether. This worthless woman is on a mission to strip the rights of american citizens at any cost. And yes I stand by my previous comment. Dianne Feinstein is a worthless cunt...just like nancy pelosi.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/83595139/

------------------------------------------------ Its pretty obvious liberals are only willing to use others in the military to do their bidding for them. Guys like billvon and andy serving the country? Thats laughable. I'm sure the first time you had a drill sergeant in your faces you would wet your underwear.

Really? Over gun nonsense? ----------------------------------------------------- This cunt over my right to defend myself and my family? You betcha. You can call me what the fuck ever you want. Not only that but she is so butt ass ugly her picture could be used to ward off scary ghosts in the dark.