SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
I agree with all that. There must have been a point in time where somebody made the decisions to change those guiding principles and gave a new guideline. When was that done?
-
I am not denying that. My question is: when did Bush reverse those principles? before or after 9/11? How long after he became president did he act on this?
-
Yup, you guys should have invaded Saudie Arabia a long time ago.
-
I think the issue might be that just because you are willing to wage war at the drop of a hat, other countries are developing weapons faster to protect themselves. I am willing to bet there is a fair percentage of the world population who thinks the US invaded Iraq for purposes other than the stated objectives at the time. That makes people sceptical and scared, thinking that maybe they could be next. When people get scared they star thinking about ways to defend themselves. We all know you an bomb the heel out of Iran, that doesn't seem to help this situation though. There is a difference between not having the balls and thinking it is not the best course of action.
-
I don't blame 9/11 on Bush at all. I think he has made mistakes prior to, and after 9/11, just like every other human being though. It is a shame he sees himself as infallible though. On top of that, if the intelligence industry wa sin such shambles and the intelligence industry is that important. Should he not have done more in the 8 months to try and rectify it?
-
I believe it would be this:
-
I do have a son now yes. If I would have had only daughters, then nature would have ended the tradition and I would have been ok with that.
-
Not keeping your name seems to be very hard for you. Hence it is hard to believe that it is illogical to think that keeping your name is hard on anyone.
-
True it is only one perspective. To me a 400 year tradition within a family with a name of which there is no second family in the world is important to me. Thankfully my wife shared that perspective.
-
Why, you seem to have a very hard time with it.
-
Actually I copied directly from his post to Google to read up on it. Google came back with that suggestion, hence I am asking him. I love it when people start making false assumption because they don't always agree with their point of view.
-
I am assuming you mean the "Torricelli's principal"?
-
I had two conditions with my marriage. One, my wife will take my last name Two, my first born son will have the initials JAD. Luckily my lovely wife agreed to it, or we would not have been married today.
-
I said question, not suggestion.
-
and in that role she seems to have always taken the view of her President to defend.
-
It won't. It will probably make it easier to trace it back to you though.
-
With the age of sexual activity falling that may not be a bad idea. Or one could off course just ignore the problem and stick one's head in the sand pretending it is not a problem.
-
Or you call them collateral damage, whichever definition suits you best. You in general.
-
Everybody knows that anybody appointed by, or with any affiliation to Clinton is absolutely fucking stupid. well, everybody except Bush himself......what does that make him then
-
So that would then fit perfectly. The statement says almost exclusively male-dominated. One woman would indeed make it almost exclusively male-dominated.
-
Ahh yes, every mistake by Bush's administration is really Clinton's fault.
-
Or you could discuss it as an act between adults who really love eachother. Discussing sex does not equal going out and doing it.
-
Now there is the million dollar question.
-
Viagra shouldn't be that hard to explain to a child. I have never seen a viagra add that mentiones erection or durations of erections. since I doubt a 4 or 5 year old knows what an erection is, they would not even get any hint at that.
-
That's why in Holland, on top of the heavily taxed gasoline, you pay an annual road tax based on the weight of your vehicle.
