SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    I sincerely doubt the answer is quite that simple. Meth and heroin have a bit of a different effect on the body and psychy of a person than alcohol. Just legalize it really is, in my opinion, a bit of a too simplistic answer. At what age should it be legal? Should it be like tobacco, or should it be like alcohol. Or should it just be legal for everybody, regardless of age? How about prostitution? Should it be legal for a 12 year old girl to sell her body for money? How about a 14 year old? What would be the age limit? Do you really think that solves a problem, or just shifts the problem to a different area?
  2. SkyDekker
    This premise is slightly flawed. Even beer is illegal to many in the US. There will always be a black market for these substances. The question would be how much violence would be attached to it. I am assuming that since you equated it to alcohol, you would restrict the sale of recreational drugs to anybody over 21? What do you think an 18 year old addicted to meth will do to get access to that drug?
  3. SkyDekker
    I wonder if spectre has jumped it yet....
  4. SkyDekker
    I am sure there are a few who don't like me. Mostly I know why too
  5. SkyDekker
    probably nothing, but it is exactly that attitude that makes america "unliked" these days. Ohh okay, the argument is now, we have done bad things in the past and killed thousands, but trust us, we wouldn't do it witha nuke...really strong argument from a country led by a government that willfully ignored evidence to make their case for war stronger....
  6. SkyDekker
    so because you haven't done it in the past, means we have to trust you in the future? Regardless of the latest actions of the American government? Speaking of intellectually valueless.....
  7. SkyDekker
    Nope, not in that scenario. Though with technological advances, once might run into questions like the one I posted above.
  8. SkyDekker
    That question raises some very difficult yet interesting questions. If the system can detect other friendlies could get hurt, it has a decision to make. Well, it needs to be programmed for that decision. So, do you allow one friendly to die to save 5? What if the one is a 4 star general and the 5 are privates? The list goes on and on.
  9. SkyDekker
    That's awesome!!!!
  10. SkyDekker
    he was a little hesitant at first, but more so with his mother than with his sister. He now loves her to death, loves to hold and kiss her and constantly asks for her, which is interesting since he is only 2 years old.
  11. SkyDekker
    depends on the situation....but I could see it go all the way up to murder. I am certainly not going to say that I won't do something...anything...cause it is illegal.
  12. SkyDekker
    Thanks, her older brother has them as well (though he is almost as blind as a bat ). Both their mother and I have brown eyes, plus our parents have brown eyes....so we're not quite sure where those bright blue eyes come from.... (pic of my son attached)
  13. SkyDekker
    whenever I see baby pics I have to post some of my own
  14. SkyDekker
    Not at all similar to the statement originally made, but nice attempt at a sidetrack. The original statement was that the gentleman would not own weed cause it was illegal. There were no other qualifiers. Which is exactly what kallend reacted to.
  15. SkyDekker
    probably not, but he made himself feel all warm and fuzzy inside when he typed it...that's got to be worth soemthing.
  16. SkyDekker
    Absolutely.... Max, heal fast!!!!!
  17. SkyDekker
    obviously you have never seen a poodle and have only seen toy poodles. (neither one are particularly manly dogs, which you seem to be mostly refering to) (come on, every counter thread has to have something serious in itas well )
  18. SkyDekker
    No, I am trying to say that implying that the US is like cops who only would do good things with weapons (in this case nukes) is a fucking joke. You have invaded a souvereign country, murdered thousands on the whim of an idiot without a true official declaration of war, without any planning for what to do after your chimpanzee in chief had his photo op on an aircraft carrier.... And your argument is: "we are the good guys, we can have them cause you can trust us"......that is a fucking joke.
  19. SkyDekker
    Just the Department of Homeland Security doing their job to protect all americans. Questioning them really is very unpatriotic.
  20. SkyDekker
    And he clearly states that he will take the opinion of those that served on his boat, to those that served with him more at arms length. Vinny clearly believes those that served with him at more fo an arms length and completely discounts the opinion of those that actually served on his boat (save one).
  21. SkyDekker
    yes he clearly states that he sees serving with as being defined differently than the way the two of you are defining it. But then, that would flow from some pretty simple reading comprehension.
  22. SkyDekker
    I am not disputing that. I am saying that funjumper clearly stated he was talking about those that were actually in his boat. You retorted with those in his boat unit, which I understand to be different. For some one who keeps harping about reading for comprehension and reading is fundamental, you seem to like to go with the assumption behind it as opposed to that which was actually written. Then when you lose the argument, you make a statement about how we need to read up about how amazing it is that those in his wardroom spoke out against him. Pretty weak....
  23. SkyDekker
    Obviously you haven't seen the video of the DEA agent. Or read the news about the two cops in NYC.
  24. SkyDekker
    I'll quote and bold it for you. You are right, reading is fundamental....
  25. SkyDekker
    I like beer boobies and really big trucks. (I gotta get my girlfriend to post on here how big my truck is....)